1. What is the furthest range you have been shot down by B-17s Defensive Guns?
2. What is the most number of attacking passes you have made on a lone B-17?
3. Have you ever been attacked by a bomber?
4. Discounting six attacks on B-17 what is your standard attack?
5. Have you ever been shot down in one good pass against a Bomber (High Angle head on or 10 o'clock attack?)
6. Would you prefer if buffs could survive multiple passes by fighters?
7. Do you feel bombers are too manuverable?
8. What change would you make so that people would still fly bombers, yet historical attacks against bombers met with more success.
9. Do you feel that fighters are disadvantage against bombers above 25k?
10. What do you feel is the best tactic in attacking a bomber?
11. Have you ever been shot down by a bomber when you felt that you had the bomber at an extreme disavantage? (I.E. Were above and well off to the side and been brought down at 1400 yards or greater)
12. Be fair, what compromise would be acceptable to Buff Pilots and Fighter Pilots?
==-==================================
I personally would prefer the ability to make 3 or 4 passes at a bomber, than to kill it in one pass. Right now I feel that you can't make that many passes.
Right now I feel that fighters whose historic roll was to attack bombers at altitude are at an extreme disadvantage because they cannot manuver at 25, 30, or 35K with a bomber. If you are fortunate enough to get above a bomber and make a high speed diving attack you have difficulty climbing back up and turning for a 2nd pass. I know that the P-47 is supposed to have improved performance at 25K and above, yet I have been trounced by B-17s and B-26s at that altitude and above. I can't catch them, and If I get above and ahead and I get lucky enough to turn at them, I will only get one pass.
Right now I feel that the increased range of the bombers guns, the manuverablity that seems unhampered at any altitude, and the poor performance of the fighters that high altitudes tilts the scale too far in favor of the buff. I would like to see a decrease in either the range of the bombers guns or their manuverability brought more inline. I would agree to an increase in bomber hardness also.
Maybe you have more comments, or questions, but I believe that bombers have too great an advantage. We need to allow some advantage so that people will fly bombers, but not to the fact that bomber pilots attack fighters and return with multiple kills. If a bomber is engaged with a fighter I want the bomber to have a reasonable chance to survive. I want fighters to be able to manuver to make an attack.
------------------

"Downtown" Lincoln Brown.
lkbrown1@tir.com http://www.tir.com/~lkbrown1 Wrecking Crews "Drag and Die Guy"
Hals und beinbruch!