this is just how difficult it is for anyone with a semiautomatic AK-47 to get a full auto.
http://www.hackcanada.com/ice3/misc/ak47mod.txtso as you see getting the weapon is the most difficult part of the process. you can find this type of modification information on virtually any semiautomatic firearm. its all right here on the web if your willing to take the time to look.
just because the one the guy had was full auto at the time doesn't mean he bought it that way.
unfortunately its not the guns that are to easy to get, its the information. you can look up and download the chemical composition of almost every explosive in use in the world today. this includes most military grades.
if one person figures out how to convert his weapon to full auto, but doesn't have the intardnet to brag it to the world, then how many people can he actually tell how to do it? the number of illegally converted weapons would be far less if the information wasn't so easily gotten by the masses.
hell you can actually go to your neighborhood library to get almost any information on weapons manufacture that may peak your interest.
there was a saying that i heard as a child that rings true in every aspect of civilization and laws
"locks only keep honest people honest"
make as many laws as you want, a person with criminal or evil intent in his heart doesn't care if he is breaking one or one hundred of them. how many criminals have you ever heard of that actually took the time to pre-read the laws in advance of committing a crime. at what point down the list of laws he intends to violate does he finally say, oh wow well number 377 is just one to many, i better go get a day job.
the worse the consequences he is risking at breaking any given law just translates into the higher the chances are that he will kill his victim in order to leave no witnesses. if he is gonna get 20 years for having the gun whats the big deal if he gets 25 for shooting someone with it?
coming to this conversation with what i shall describe as a colorful back ground i can tell you this for a fact. if a person is known to be armed that person is less likely to be a victim. criminals are generally looking for the EASY score, not the one that shoots back.
now yes people who have weapons do get victimized from time to time, but it is much less often compared to those who are unarmed. yes guns do get stolen, but if you look into those types of cases the homes were broken into when the person was not home. the criminal wanted the weapons but doesn't want the risk of taking on the gun owner.
how many guns store have you heard of being held up? now how many corner stores. why do you think that is?
having rational gun control boils down to properly storing them so stealing them becomes much harder, and properly educating those who will own them to prevent accidents.
taking them away from people who will obey the laws only creates a situation that helps guarantee that only the criminal will be armed.
FLOTSOM