Why would you stuka 200 perk B-29s when you can endlessly stuka Lancs for nothing?
The bomber crowd deserves a bone tosssed in the form of a perked bomber. I'd rather see A-26s, 111s, and TU-2s, come first but I hope the 29 eventually makes its way into the game.
Well it hasnt been added to the game as of yet. so to say it woud have a 200 point perk is strictly speculative.
Based onteh reduction of perks required to take perk rides now.
I doubt it would ever see a 200 point perk value
But regardless of its perk value.
People WILL dive bomb it so long as that ability is modeled into the game.
I personally dont think Lancs and 17's should modeled in a way that they be allowed to drop at more then a 10-15 percent angle.
This tactic was used probably less then 1% of all the missions flown in the entire war.
Yet you can see it happen on a daily basis here.
there are some aircraft we will never have because of how few of them that were ever in service during the war.
the same mentality should be applied to the use of dive bombing by the heavy bombers.
So long as that aspect remains modeled into the game. I'll be against the 29 ever being added
on your alternate selections
I'd also much rather see before the 29
Ju 88H-2 Long range fighter version of Ju 88H-1 reconnaissance aircraft. Based on stretched Ju 88D-1 fuselage with Ju 88G-1 wings and engines. Two 20 mm MG 151 cannon in solid nose and four more in belly pack
Or one of the JU88 P series with the 75 mm PaK 40 anti-tank cannon,
