Author Topic: Next FSO: Bougainville Privateers: Solomons 1943  (Read 3049 times)

Offline nikomon

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 127
Re: Next FSO: Bougainville Privateers: Solomons 1943
« Reply #30 on: January 08, 2009, 02:21:05 PM »
TAC Drivers, registered and ready for our first FSO.  :aok
Hey WELCOME !!  :salute


FSO the true secrete of HTC
"INTEGRITY is doing the right thing when no one else is watching."
Flying Since:Tour 87 4/2007
RT KOTH CHAMPION 2009-2010

Offline Becinhu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2633
Re: Next FSO: Bougainville Privateers: Solomons 1943
« Reply #31 on: January 08, 2009, 07:33:13 PM »
CLAIM JUMPERS updated
412th Braunco Mustangs OG
412th FNVG FSO
80th FS "Headhunters" MA

Offline ELD66

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1588
Re: Next FSO: Bougainville Privateers: Solomons 1943
« Reply #32 on: January 08, 2009, 09:50:17 PM »
TAC Drivers, registered and ready for our first FSO.  :aok
Welcome!
E1Diablo in game

Member of JG11 Sonderstaffel


Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: Next FSO: Bougainville Privateers: Solomons 1943
« Reply #33 on: January 09, 2009, 08:51:27 AM »
ORDERS?  Anyone?  Anywhere?   :)
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline gusman

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 599
Re: Next FSO: Bougainville Privateers: Solomons 1943
« Reply #34 on: January 09, 2009, 11:25:34 AM »
Next Week Jan 16th  :aok

Cheers,
gusman44

Lt Cdr gus
801 Squadron FAA
Squadron XO

Offline Hamltnblue

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 428
Re: Next FSO: Bougainville Privateers: Solomons 1943
« Reply #35 on: January 09, 2009, 02:52:20 PM »
ORDERS?  Anyone?  Anywhere?   :)
Orders will be drawn up after the objectives go out. Expect them after Tuesday

Offline Odee

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2718
      • 49th Fighter Group
Re: Next FSO: Bougainville Privateers: Solomons 1943
« Reply #36 on: January 09, 2009, 05:47:13 PM »
Is it the 16th yet?   :pray

 :noid
~Nobodee~   Get Poached!
Elite: Dangerous ~ Cmd Odeed

http://www.luxlibertas.com/

Offline 1pLUs44

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3332
Re: Next FSO: Bougainville Privateers: Solomons 1943
« Reply #37 on: January 09, 2009, 08:25:53 PM »
Just curious, wouldn't there have been P-47s at this stage during the war?
No one knows what the future may bring.

Offline splitatom

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 765
Re: Next FSO: Bougainville Privateers: Solomons 1943
« Reply #38 on: January 09, 2009, 09:41:43 PM »
p-47 were need in europe more because of there long range and they could escort further then anything they had
snowey flying since tour 78

Offline Squire

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7683
Re: Next FSO: Bougainville Privateers: Solomons 1943
« Reply #39 on: January 10, 2009, 01:56:38 AM »
There were P-47s, but they were based in New Guinea (348th FG), not the Solomons. That being said, because an a/c may have been present, does not guarantee its inclusion in any particular design, there are a # of factors that have to be met. Im sure P-47s will be making an appearance again in a Pacific FSO at some point.
Warloc
Friday Squad Ops CM Team
1841 Squadron Fleet Air Arm
Aces High since Tour 24

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Next FSO: Bougainville Privateers: Solomons 1943
« Reply #40 on: January 10, 2009, 12:55:19 PM »
So, I didn't see this anywhere, but are you still using the Ki67 or was that switched out with something that the US planeset can actually catch?

P-38G (max 48, no rockets)
P-40E (max 48)
P-39D
F4U-1A (max 32)
F4U-1 (max 32)
SBD-5 
B-25C
B-24J (max 18 with no formations)

Of those probably only the F4us have a decent chance at catching them.

On the same note, none of the axis planeset can currently catch a B-24:

Axis (IJAAF/IJN):
A6M5 (max 120) 
A6M2
Ki-61 (max 64)
Ki-67 (min 24 *players*)
D3A (may reup with 2nd lives at T+60 min in A6M5s)

Except maybe the Ki67s lol!!

Offline ELD66

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1588
Re: Next FSO: Bougainville Privateers: Solomons 1943
« Reply #41 on: January 12, 2009, 03:14:29 PM »
So, I didn't see this anywhere, but are you still using the Ki67 or was that switched out with something that the US planeset can actually catch?

P-38G (max 48, no rockets)
P-40E (max 48)
P-39D
F4U-1A (max 32)
F4U-1 (max 32)
SBD-5 
B-25C
B-24J (max 18 with no formations)

Of those probably only the F4us have a decent chance at catching them.

On the same note, none of the axis planeset can currently catch a B-24:

Axis (IJAAF/IJN):
A6M5 (max 120) 
A6M2
Ki-61 (max 64)
Ki-67 (min 24 *players*)
D3A (may reup with 2nd lives at T+60 min in A6M5s)

Except maybe the Ki67s lol!!

F4U and P38G will be able to catch them. Also P40E can outdive the KI67.
E1Diablo in game

Member of JG11 Sonderstaffel


Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Next FSO: Bougainville Privateers: Solomons 1943
« Reply #42 on: January 12, 2009, 04:34:17 PM »
P-40E can barely catch a B-25C, which is 30mph slower than the Ki. I know this because I tried chasing some down in the MWA a while back. It can dive, sure, but it takes it half an hour to get to 20k  :D

So you're talking only 1-2 dives per frame, assuming they're not driven off by any zekes. In that case they can't re-engage the bombers again.

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Next FSO: Bougainville Privateers: Solomons 1943
« Reply #43 on: January 12, 2009, 05:00:27 PM »
I keep saying there needs to be a tighter leash to stop the max-power buff formations (never mind when those buff formations start diving to evade from enemy fighters without losing their drones).
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Next FSO: Bougainville Privateers: Solomons 1943
« Reply #44 on: January 13, 2009, 02:05:35 PM »
I keep saying there needs to be a tighter leash to stop the max-power buff formations (never mind when those buff formations start diving to evade from enemy fighters without losing their drones).

Amen to that. And the ones that porpoise up and down wildly, erratically, and the ones that perform immelmans and turn 180 without losing their drones (they warp like hell to keep up, but they stay with the lead).