Author Topic: Field Artillary  (Read 2664 times)

Offline aerosaber

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 93
      • http://www.tampapi.com
Field Artillary
« on: January 03, 2009, 04:40:25 PM »
Could be aimed same way we aim naval guns. Self propelled 155s to hammer spawn points or flatten a town.

Offline JunkyII

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8428
Re: Field Artillary
« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2009, 04:45:49 PM »
155s werent used till modern wars like desert storm i think and also Im pretty sure there was already a post about this, I think it was mine.....
DFC Member
Proud Member of Pigs on the Wing
"Yikes"

Offline splitatom

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 765
Re: Field Artillary
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2009, 10:44:27 PM »
they had i think a working model and was used in like late wwII and korea but 105 howitsers were mounted hummel and priest
snowey flying since tour 78

Offline vonKrimm

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 949
Re: Field Artillary
« Reply #3 on: January 04, 2009, 01:04:49 AM »
155s weren't used till modern wars like desert storm i think and also I'm pretty sure there was already a post about this, I think it was mine.....

Inaccurate.  The M12 GMC was a self-propelled 155mm artillery piece fielded by the U.S. Army in WWII.  the gun was a m1917 or m1918, both derived from the French 155mm GPF of WWI mounted on an M3 (Grant/Lee) hull with M4 suspension.  There was also the towed 155mm M1/M2 gun, the famed "Long Tom".  Later the m1/m2 was mounted on a M4 chassis & designated the M40 GMC, aka "King Kong" and saw service beginning in Korea, except for one single M40 that made it to Europe before the end of WWII.

But anyhow, IMHO, artillery would not be a good idea for AH at this juncture.


Fight Like a Girl

Offline 71313

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 126
Re: Field Artillary
« Reply #4 on: January 04, 2009, 02:20:54 PM »
88 where also used during this peirod
handle the business,before the business handles you

Offline E25280

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3475
      • http://125thspartanforums.com
Re: Field Artillary
« Reply #5 on: January 04, 2009, 02:39:35 PM »
Inaccurate.  The M12 GMC was a self-propelled 155mm artillery piece fielded by the U.S. Army in WWII.  the gun was a m1917 or m1918, both derived from the French 155mm GPF of WWI mounted on an M3 (Grant/Lee) hull with M4 suspension.  There was also the towed 155mm M1/M2 gun, the famed "Long Tom".  Later the m1/m2 was mounted on a M4 chassis & designated the M40 GMC, aka "King Kong" and saw service beginning in Korea, except for one single M40 that made it to Europe before the end of WWII.
Just to add to this, splitatom, the German Hummel sported a 150mm gun.  The Russians had their SU-122s and SU-152s.  Guns of a caliber larger than 105mm mounted on armored chassis were certainly available.
Brauno in a past life, followed by LTARget
SWtarget in current incarnation
Captain and Communications Officer~125th Spartans

"Proudly drawing fire so that my brothers may pass unharmed."

Offline CAVPFCDD

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 535
Re: Field Artillary
« Reply #6 on: January 04, 2009, 03:23:05 PM »
refer to this thread

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,251405.0.html

and no not because its mine  :devil
"There ain't no revolution, only evolution, but every time I'm in Georgia I eat a peach for peace." - Duane Allman

"Constantly choosing the lesser of two evils is still choosing evil." Jerry Garcia

Offline 100goon

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 253
Re: Field Artillary
« Reply #7 on: January 04, 2009, 06:21:27 PM »
ill end this now NO!!!!!!!!  :mad: :o :devil :furious :noid :t
Claim Jumpers


Offline Banshee7

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6661
Re: Field Artillary
« Reply #8 on: January 04, 2009, 06:28:36 PM »
Tours 86 - 296

Offline Martyn

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 536
Re: Field Artillary
« Reply #9 on: January 05, 2009, 05:21:59 PM »
I vote yes.
Towed artillery can help flatten a town, but it needs aiming and if you make it require a FOO then it won't be too easy either. Also the artillery is pretty open to air attacks (a new target for mud thumpers).
Here we are, living on top of a molten ball of rock, spinning around at a 1,000mph, orbiting a nuclear fireball and whizzing through space at half-a-million miles per hour. Most of us believe in super-beings which for some reason need to be praised for setting this up. This, apparently, is normal.

Offline SectorNine50

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1331
Re: Field Artillary
« Reply #10 on: January 05, 2009, 05:26:34 PM »
I agree, this could be very useful.  I have a feeling it would also keep carriers from getting too close to airbases as well... I've personally never heard of an aircraft carrier beach landing and releasing LVT's... :P
I'm Sector95 in-game! :-D

Offline LTARadio

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 48
      • Lead To Air Ratio
Re: Field Artillary
« Reply #11 on: January 07, 2009, 06:26:54 AM »
I think the German Hummel will be best suited for self propelled artillery. We need field artillery.





<S>

LTARecon
Swift....Silent....Deadly

Online Tmac7

  • ID641
  • *
  • Posts: 345
Re: Field Artillary
« Reply #12 on: January 07, 2009, 06:49:57 AM »
and if any fighters try and get it you can get your squady to up a trusty Wirbelwind
Member of ****ALCHEMIST****

"E Tan Epi Tan"
Proud United States Marine

Offline Martyn

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 536
Re: Field Artillary
« Reply #13 on: January 08, 2009, 04:01:05 PM »
The allies had motorised guns too - Priest, Archer, etc. And the Russians had some serious kit too. Plenty to model.
Here we are, living on top of a molten ball of rock, spinning around at a 1,000mph, orbiting a nuclear fireball and whizzing through space at half-a-million miles per hour. Most of us believe in super-beings which for some reason need to be praised for setting this up. This, apparently, is normal.

Offline aerosaber

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 93
      • http://www.tampapi.com
Re: Field Artillary
« Reply #14 on: January 10, 2009, 06:42:45 PM »
Goon100 says no....lol.  To quote El Guapo, "Who to hell are you?". And about this obsession with Gladiators...Hmmmmm.