<snip>
With all due respect
Skuzzy is stuck in the past with Windows 98 (he's tweeking of XP give you the 98 look and feel). 9X, ME, 2000 all all dead and waiting for the wake and grieving to get over with the demise of XP.
Evolve or die, with Windows.
Ultimately embrace freedom choose Linux.
ROFL!
Yes, I trim the fat where I can, so shoot me. I detest operating systems that pretend to be more than just operating systems. I detest my computer being bogged down for no reason at all. You like bloatware, then Vista is for you. Ever heard the phrase that sometimes going forward is a step backward? Remind me why someone should pay for an operating system that has more documented compatibility problems than any OS Microsoft has released since Windows 95?
Then remind me again, why a Vista owner has to pay to upgrade to Windows 7, which is nothing more than some bug fixes you used to get in a service pack for free?
Now, tell me why this operating system is oh, so much better than its predecessors? Did you also think Windows ME was moving forward?
The only place I found myself stuck in, is wondering why anyone would actually pay for Vista or Windows 7. They do not bring anything to the table that you cannot do in XP, and they have the added benefit of not being able to run a bunch of software XP will.
Then again, I am an engineer, and like most engineers, I am content to stay with what works better than what is available to replace it. Now, other that what the Microsoft marketing machine has spewed forth, what did you offer as fact that Vista/Windows 7 is really a better alternative to XP? Please, tell me what Earth shattering thing I am missing. I have Vista on a test machine at the office and it is an abomination. It does not do anything better than XP, but it does do many things worse.