Author Topic: P A N T H E R  (Read 1064 times)

Offline shreck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
P A N T H E R
« on: January 28, 2009, 06:26:10 PM »
I'm thinkin it would be cool  :aok

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: P A N T H E R
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2009, 06:37:19 PM »
Think maybe you could start 2 or 3 more threads wishing the same? :rolleyes:
See Rule #4

Offline WWhiskey

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3122
Re: P A N T H E R
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2009, 07:24:30 PM »
probably the longest single gv request that i know of ,
 possible exeption would be wirble, and poooof there it was
Flying since tour 71.

Offline Latrobe

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5975
Re: P A N T H E R
« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2009, 08:22:26 PM »
we also need the f86 saber becuz it wuz kewl 2!!


In all seriousness, I'd like to see the Panther added, just not anytime soon. There are plenty more gvs to be added first.

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: P A N T H E R
« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2009, 09:50:46 PM »
For many many reasons...

No.

at least not yet.   ;)
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline skullman

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 432
Re: P A N T H E R
« Reply #5 on: January 29, 2009, 09:15:11 AM »
panther would be a great addition :aok :rock
been there destroyed that

Offline Puck

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2980
Re: P A N T H E R
« Reply #6 on: January 29, 2009, 05:06:09 PM »
...and now, for some sublimely subtle thread hijacking, we bring you...the P A N T H E R!  It could have seen service in WWII if the war had lasted 13 years longer...

General characteristics

    * Crew: 1
    * Length: 37 ft 5 in (11.3 m)
    * Wingspan: 38 ft 0 in (11.6 m)
    * Height: 11 ft 4 in (3.8 m)
    * Wing area: 250 ft² (23 m²)
    * Empty weight: 9,303 lb (4,220 kg)
    * Loaded weight: 14,235 lb (6,456 kg)
    * Max takeoff weight: 16,450 lb (7,462 kg)
    * Powerplant: 1× Pratt & Whitney J42-P-6/P-8 turbojet, 5,950 lbf (26.5 kN) with water injection

Performance

    * Maximum speed: 500 knots (575 mph, 925 km/h)
    * Range: 1,300 mi (1,100 nm, 2,100 km)
    * Service ceiling 44,600 ft (13,600 m)
    * Rate of climb: 5,140 ft/min (26.1 m/s)
    * Wing loading: 71 lb/ft² (350 kg/m²)
    * Thrust/weight: 0.42

Armament

    * Guns: 4× 20 mm (0.787 in) M2 cannon, 190 rounds/gun
    * Hardpoints: Underwing hardpoints with provisions to carry combinations of:
          o Rockets: 6× 5 in (127 mm) rockets on underwing hardpoints
          o Bombs: 2,000 lb (910 kg) of bombs
//c coad  c coad run  run coad run
main (){char _[]={"S~||(iuv{nkx%K9Y$hzhhd\x0c"},__
,___=1;for(__=___>>___;__<((___<<___<<___<<___<<___
)+(___<<___<<___<<___)-___);__+=___)putchar((_[__
])+(__/((___<<___)+___))-((___&

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: P A N T H E R
« Reply #7 on: January 29, 2009, 05:37:18 PM »
I'm thinkin it would be cool  :aok
Yet another request where the reasoning is based on its, "cool" factor. :rolleyes:
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline shreck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
Re: P A N T H E R
« Reply #8 on: January 30, 2009, 11:41:03 AM »
Yet another request where the reasoning is based on its, "cool" factor. :rolleyes:

And maybe cause there were over  6500 of them built, Hmm makes it a viable choice me thinks  :aok   :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Offline JB11

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 248
Re: P A N T H E R
« Reply #9 on: January 30, 2009, 12:29:31 PM »
...and now, for some sublimely subtle thread hijacking, we bring you...the P A N T H E R!  It could have seen service in WWII if the war had lasted 13 years longer...

General characteristics

    * Crew: 1
    * Length: 37 ft 5 in (11.3 m)
    * Wingspan: 38 ft 0 in (11.6 m)
    * Height: 11 ft 4 in (3.8 m)
    * Wing area: 250 ft² (23 m²)
    * Empty weight: 9,303 lb (4,220 kg)
    * Loaded weight: 14,235 lb (6,456 kg)
    * Max takeoff weight: 16,450 lb (7,462 kg)
    * Powerplant: 1× Pratt & Whitney J42-P-6/P-8 turbojet, 5,950 lbf (26.5 kN) with water injection

Performance

    * Maximum speed: 500 knots (575 mph, 925 km/h)
    * Range: 1,300 mi (1,100 nm, 2,100 km)
    * Service ceiling 44,600 ft (13,600 m)
    * Rate of climb: 5,140 ft/min (26.1 m/s)
    * Wing loading: 71 lb/ft² (350 kg/m²)
    * Thrust/weight: 0.42

Armament

    * Guns: 4× 20 mm (0.787 in) M2 cannon, 190 rounds/gun
    * Hardpoints: Underwing hardpoints with provisions to carry combinations of:
          o Rockets: 6× 5 in (127 mm) rockets on underwing hardpoints
          o Bombs: 2,000 lb (910 kg) of bombs

Ummmm, I think he's talking about the tank.   :confused:

 :salute 11
Never abandon the possibility of attack. Attack even from a position of inferiority, to disrupt the enemy's plans. This often results in improving one's own position. - General Adolf Galland, Luftwaffe
Proverbs 3:5,6

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: P A N T H E R
« Reply #10 on: January 30, 2009, 12:39:58 PM »
...and now, for some sublimely subtle thread hijacking...
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline JB11

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 248
Re: P A N T H E R
« Reply #11 on: January 30, 2009, 12:49:02 PM »
Maybe we should try sticking to the subject.  But that's just me.  I get his point.  But thanks for the correction.

I'm sure he's a big boy and can answer for hims........let's just stop right there.

 :salute 11
Never abandon the possibility of attack. Attack even from a position of inferiority, to disrupt the enemy's plans. This often results in improving one's own position. - General Adolf Galland, Luftwaffe
Proverbs 3:5,6

Offline SuperDud

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4587
Re: P A N T H E R
« Reply #12 on: January 30, 2009, 03:02:29 PM »
WOOOWOOOOOOOOO
SuperDud
++Blue Knights++

Offline Iron_Cross

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 431
Re: P A N T H E R
« Reply #13 on: January 30, 2009, 08:18:25 PM »
OK, lets do this!

Leroy Jenkins

Offline Puck

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2980
Re: P A N T H E R
« Reply #14 on: January 30, 2009, 09:45:10 PM »
Maybe we should try sticking to the subject.  But that's just me.  I get his point.  But thanks for the correction.

I'm sure he's a big boy and can answer for hims........let's just stop right there.

 :salute 11

The title said "Panther" and my mind said "F9F".  I know (almost) nothing about tanks.  My nephew used to drive M1A2s if that counts.

The Panther would fit between the Panzer and the Tiger, wouldn't it?
//c coad  c coad run  run coad run
main (){char _[]={"S~||(iuv{nkx%K9Y$hzhhd\x0c"},__
,___=1;for(__=___>>___;__<((___<<___<<___<<___<<___
)+(___<<___<<___<<___)-___);__+=___)putchar((_[__
])+(__/((___<<___)+___))-((___&