« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

Author Topic: gun damage ratio  (Read 2236 times)

Offline dirt911

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 435
gun damage ratio
« on: February 02, 2009, 02:51:53 PM »
i dont know if this is been posted before..........but we need the gun damage ratio upped its too low and guns are bad using like 50 bullets on one enemy,...............


not worth it i give this idea a :aok
Logged

Offline Steve

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6728
Re: gun damage ratio
« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2009, 03:02:21 PM »
huh?
Logged
Member: Hot Soup Mafia - Cream of Myshroom
Army of Muppets  Yes, my ingame name is Steve

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: gun damage ratio
« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2009, 03:05:00 PM »
Improve your aim and tactics to match the weapons of your chosen fighter.  Guns hit plenty hard.  Nothing takes 50 well aimed .50 cal rounds.
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline SectorNine50

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1331
Re: gun damage ratio
« Reply #3 on: February 02, 2009, 03:11:14 PM »
If you read combat logs, you'll notice that most pilots will go through hundreds of rounds on a single contact.  The guns are just fine. :aok
Logged
I'm Sector95 in-game! :-D

Offline VonMessa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11922
Re: gun damage ratio
« Reply #4 on: February 02, 2009, 03:20:50 PM »
Quote from: SectorNine50 on February 02, 2009, 03:11:14 PM
If you read combat logs, you'll notice that most pilots will go through hundreds of rounds on a single contact.  The guns are just fine. :aok

Unless it's a K-4, then there is only 85 Taters to go through.

 :lol
Logged
Braümeister und Schmutziger Hund von JG11


We are all here because we are not all there.

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: gun damage ratio
« Reply #5 on: February 02, 2009, 03:22:07 PM »
...65...
Logged

Offline VonMessa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11922
Re: gun damage ratio
« Reply #6 on: February 02, 2009, 03:23:17 PM »
fixed    :aok

(damn  luftweenies)  :furious

 :noid
Logged
Braümeister und Schmutziger Hund von JG11


We are all here because we are not all there.

Offline Serenity

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7313
Re: gun damage ratio
« Reply #7 on: February 03, 2009, 12:31:39 AM »
Quote from: VonMessa on February 02, 2009, 03:23:17 PM
(damn  luftweenies)  :furious

Says the JG-11 pilot...

I think you're just used to the doggy-style fighting in your fluffy-wulf 190.
Logged

Offline BnZs

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4207
Re: gun damage ratio
« Reply #8 on: February 03, 2009, 01:20:45 AM »
Odd, most people complain the guns are TOO lethal for some reason.
Logged
"Crikey, sir. I'm looking forward to today. Up diddly up, down diddly down, whoops, poop, twiddly dee - decent scrap with the fiendish Red Baron - bit of a jolly old crash landing behind enemy lines - capture, torture, escape, and then back home in time for tea and medals."

Offline dirt911

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 435
Re: gun damage ratio
« Reply #9 on: February 03, 2009, 01:25:18 AM »
i dont fly the stupid 190 i like the p47 but all day today i shat probably all my rounds int one set of lancs not even any smoke goes out
Logged

Offline BnZs

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4207
Re: gun damage ratio
« Reply #10 on: February 03, 2009, 01:27:17 AM »
From 1K no doubt...

The minimum number of .50 caliber bullets to destroy a Lanc is 1 I believe. Right in the pilot's forehead.



Quote from: dirt911 on February 03, 2009, 01:25:18 AM
i shat .....

 :lol
« Last Edit: February 03, 2009, 01:33:03 AM by BnZs »
Logged
"Crikey, sir. I'm looking forward to today. Up diddly up, down diddly down, whoops, poop, twiddly dee - decent scrap with the fiendish Red Baron - bit of a jolly old crash landing behind enemy lines - capture, torture, escape, and then back home in time for tea and medals."

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Re: gun damage ratio
« Reply #11 on: February 03, 2009, 04:54:34 AM »
Guns are lethal enough.

A 30mm to the brain wont do any good if it misses by 100 feet... much like a clue that doesnt hit the same area.
Logged

Offline Tec

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
Re: gun damage ratio
« Reply #12 on: February 03, 2009, 05:10:13 AM »
I think he meant he shat all his bullets AT a set of Lancs.  I fly the Jug quite a bit and it absolutely destroys bombers, even from long range.
Logged
To each their pwn.
K$22L7AoH

Offline VonMessa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11922
Re: gun damage ratio
« Reply #13 on: February 03, 2009, 06:54:46 AM »
Quote from: dirt911 on February 03, 2009, 01:25:18 AM
i dont fly the stupid 190 i like the p47 but all day today i shat probably all my rounds int one set of lancs not even any smoke goes out

You must not be good enough, yet      :D

I think I got your point.  I'm just not sure if I totally got it from your gross lack of grammar and punctuation.
Logged
Braümeister und Schmutziger Hund von JG11


We are all here because we are not all there.

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: gun damage ratio
« Reply #14 on: February 03, 2009, 07:29:31 AM »
Where did you shoot him? I can take down three B-24s with the six .50cal in my F4U-1A and still have plenty left for a couple or four fighter kills. If you blew all your load on one Lancaster (which isn't nearly as tough as the Liberator) with nothing to show for it you're doing something wrong.
Logged
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
« previous next »