Author Topic: Me-262 Nacelle Cone  (Read 2013 times)

Offline Larry

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6123
Me-262 Nacelle Cone
« on: February 06, 2009, 07:21:19 AM »
I was wondering if anyone knew if the engine nacelle cones on the Me-262 had the spiral effects like some of the 109s, 190/152s did?


Another queston I have is do you think they'll let me skin a Me262A-2a on our 262?
Once known as ''TrueKill''.
JG 54 "Grünherz"
July '18 KOTH Winner


Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10585
Re: Me-262 Nacelle Cone
« Reply #1 on: February 06, 2009, 08:47:03 AM »
I was wondering if anyone knew if the engine nacelle cones on the Me-262 had the spiral effects like some of the 109s, 190/152s did?


Another queston I have is do you think they'll let me skin a Me262A-2a on our 262?
No Spirals on any of the books I have. I don't see why not out side of the bomb mounts I think it is the same plane.

Offline Shifty

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9377
      • 307th FS
Re: Me-262 Nacelle Cone
« Reply #2 on: February 06, 2009, 08:47:54 AM »
Larry,

I've never seen the spirals on 262 nacelle cones. That doesn't mean they didn't do it.
They're recessed so they may not be visible enough to make it worth the effort.

JG-11"Black Hearts"...nur die Stolzen, nur die Starken

"Haji may have blown my legs off but I'm still a stud"~ SPC Thomas Vandeventer Delta1/5 1st CAV

Offline Larry

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6123
Re: Me-262 Nacelle Cone
« Reply #3 on: February 06, 2009, 09:09:06 AM »
I have them done already I was just wondering if I should keep them or not.


Once known as ''TrueKill''.
JG 54 "Grünherz"
July '18 KOTH Winner


Offline Wmaker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5743
      • Lentolaivue 34 website
Re: Me-262 Nacelle Cone
« Reply #4 on: February 06, 2009, 09:53:49 AM »
I haven't seen a single photo of 262 that would have spirals in the nacelles. I'm pretty sure there weren't 262 that had them. It has probably a lot to do with the fact that the unlike spinners in prop fighters, those nacelles didnt turn with the turbine blades but housed the starter motors.
Wmaker
Lentolaivue 34

Thank you for the Brewster HTC!

Offline Lord ReDhAwK

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 481
      • http://www.revivecomputing.com/aggressors
Re: Me-262 Nacelle Cone
« Reply #5 on: February 06, 2009, 11:28:24 AM »
1. I haven't seen a single instance of the spiral on any 262 during my study of it.  This was a housing that was forward of the turbofan that rotated.  None of the 262 manufacturing plants would have painted them in the scheme you're describing.  Possibly in the field but I seriously doubt it.

2. Quoting Squadron Signal Walk Around #42...Page 3

"The Me262 A-2a "Blitzbomber" (fast fighter bomber) had the upper pair of MK-108 30mm cannons deleted, and two ET 503 or Wikingerschiff (Viking ship) bomb racks mounted on the lower nose undersurface.  It could carry either two SC-250 blast bombs or two SD-250 fragmentation bombs.  The empty upper gun ports were faired over on some Me 262A-2a, but were left open on others, making them externally indistinguishable from the fighter varient.
 
ReDhAwK
C.O.
The Aggressors

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: Me-262 Nacelle Cone
« Reply #6 on: February 06, 2009, 02:30:55 PM »
The spirals were a recognition device used by the Luftwaffe.  Day Fighters only.  So, if you couldn't actually see them there would be no reason for them to be there.



wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Me-262 Nacelle Cone
« Reply #7 on: February 06, 2009, 04:30:40 PM »
Agreed, leave them off.

Also, the bomber 262s were slight modifications, as some have mentioned, but their roles and perhaps their camo was different as well. By this I mean the night fighter and the day fighters were "pretty" close as well, but they carried different markings.

I'd avoid the bomb-carrying camo jobs because it's sort of like putting Jabo markings from a 190F onto a fighter-only 190D. Similar planes, but the plane you're skinning just simply didn't play the roles you're skinning it for.

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Me-262 Nacelle Cone
« Reply #8 on: February 06, 2009, 04:31:48 PM »
I'd avoid the bomb-carrying camo jobs because it's sort of like putting Jabo markings from a 190F onto a fighter-only 190D. Similar planes, but the plane you're skinning just simply didn't play the roles you're skinning it for.
What about your Jabo 109F?

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Me-262 Nacelle Cone
« Reply #9 on: February 06, 2009, 04:38:36 PM »
Because the 109F skin happened to be the JABO gruppe with interesting rudder marks, but otherwise the camo was used for fighters.

I would guess the reason he's trying to skin a bomb-toting 262 is because he wants to do an interesting or unique skin (otherwise he'd have picked a similar fighter camo style).

Other than that, the centerline bomb option is more likely to be reinstated on the 109F than adding 2 bombs, removing 2 guns, on the 262 flight models. In-game, the 262s are a 1-trick pony.


EDIT: Maybe it would help to know what he was attempting to skin? It might not even be an issue, but seemed at first glance like he was trying to hide the skin he was working on (possibly a surprise?)
« Last Edit: February 06, 2009, 04:40:12 PM by Krusty »

Offline Larry

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6123
Re: Me-262 Nacelle Cone
« Reply #10 on: February 06, 2009, 04:50:04 PM »
The skin I want to do don't have the spirals on the cone I was just trying it out and wondering if it was comman or not like the other LW planes. If it was I would have included them. Iv been working on this skin for a total of twelve hours and I'm still on the panel lines since I'm doing them from scratch because the default ones IMO are wrong.



Here is a picture of the one I was looking at.


Once known as ''TrueKill''.
JG 54 "Grünherz"
July '18 KOTH Winner


Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Me-262 Nacelle Cone
« Reply #11 on: February 06, 2009, 05:03:51 PM »
In this case, the white "squiggles" were common of LW bombers and/or night fighters, but not really suitable for the fighter-only version we have in-game.

Offline Larry

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6123
Re: Me-262 Nacelle Cone
« Reply #12 on: February 07, 2009, 01:19:46 AM »
Does anyone have any pictues of how the rivets were layed out on the 262?
Once known as ''TrueKill''.
JG 54 "Grünherz"
July '18 KOTH Winner


Offline Lord ReDhAwK

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 481
      • http://www.revivecomputing.com/aggressors
Re: Me-262 Nacelle Cone
« Reply #13 on: February 07, 2009, 03:12:00 AM »
I adjusted the saturation on these scans so the rivets pop out a bit more for ya.

4 Pics (Top, Belly, Port, Starboard.)  The Starboard does not show the rivets.  However, it does show the medical access hatch, 2 access cover plates on the Starboard Rear Stabilizer.  Also, no flare ports are on the Starboard fuselage.  Only the Port.

ReDhAwK
« Last Edit: February 07, 2009, 03:19:45 AM by Lord ReDhAwK »
C.O.
The Aggressors

Offline Larry

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6123
Re: Me-262 Nacelle Cone
« Reply #14 on: February 08, 2009, 01:26:15 AM »
Thanks redhawk.
Once known as ''TrueKill''.
JG 54 "Grünherz"
July '18 KOTH Winner