Author Topic: New GV  (Read 832 times)

Offline ebfd11

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4151
      • [b]POTW[/b]
New GV
« on: February 15, 2009, 11:44:30 PM »
I really dont know if this has been posted but here is a request for a new gv. Everyone says we have too many American and German gv's how about a Japanese for a change.. last I knew weren't they also in the war.. sorry bout that sarcasm. It is just a thought.


Type 4 Chi-To
Place of origin    Empire of Japan
Specifications
Weight   30 tons
Length   6.73 meters
Width   2.87 meters
Height   2.87 meters
Crew   5
Armor   12-75 mm
Primary
armament   Type 4 75mm gun
Secondary
armament   2x Type 97 Light Machine Guns
Engine   Air-cooled Type 4 V12 Diesel engine with supercharger
400 HP
Suspension   Bell crank
Operational
range   250 kilometers
Speed   45 km/h
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7d/Chi-To.JPG
PIGS ON THE WING 3RD WING

InGame id: LawnDart
RIP Skullman Potzie and BentNail

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: New GV
« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2009, 11:46:33 PM »
Didn't see combat I believe. That disqualifies it.
See Rule #4

Offline ebfd11

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4151
      • [b]POTW[/b]
Re: New GV
« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2009, 08:34:46 AM »
yess sir u were right ..did some investigation and it didnt get in..but still would be nice to get some japanese armor in game
PIGS ON THE WING 3RD WING

InGame id: LawnDart
RIP Skullman Potzie and BentNail

Offline shreck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
Re: New GV
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2009, 11:39:59 AM »
-----------------> P A N T H E R <---------------  :aok

Offline USCH

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1713
Re: New GV
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2009, 04:05:13 PM »
we only play with cartoons that were in WWII so it will not even make it to the list of things to be picked... let alone picked

Offline Belial

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1589
Re: New GV
« Reply #5 on: February 17, 2009, 02:23:34 AM »
Hellcat or the PANTHER :aok

Offline chris3

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 690
      • http://www.ludwigs-hobby-seite.de/
Re: New GV
« Reply #6 on: February 17, 2009, 09:44:10 AM »
moin

or this baby


cu chris3

Offline BigPlay

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
Re: New GV
« Reply #7 on: February 17, 2009, 01:43:10 PM »
yess sir u were right ..did some investigation and it didnt get in..but still would be nice to get some japanese armor in game


 Why, so M8's can maul it?

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: New GV
« Reply #8 on: February 17, 2009, 02:27:24 PM »
It would be nice to see Japanese tanks in the game. Unfortunately the Japanese didn't cooperate back in WW-ll and their armor was bloody awful.

They had some sound armor tacticians in the IJA, a few that studied with the Germans. But unfortunately a lot of this expertise didn't didn't dribble down to company level. So the actual use of what lousy armor they had was mostly unimaginative and poorly executed. The mind set of many IJA officers was that the tank was un-manly and not in tune with the warrior ethos.

They were really in no position to start a war against an alliance of nations like Australia, Britain, and America. The lack of effective armor and doctrine was a big reason why.

In The Battle of Khalkhyn Gol they got a birds eye seat to modern armor tactics/combined arms as executed by one of the greatest tank Generals in history, G. Zhukov. Unfortunately for them I dont think they actually came away from that battle with anything other then a defeat. For the most part modern tank design and manufacture took a back seat in Japanese manufacture and IJA doctrine.

Its a good thing for us they didnt have type-4s in '42, or even '43. :salute
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: New GV
« Reply #9 on: February 17, 2009, 02:43:20 PM »

 Why, so M8's can maul it?

The Chi-To was the IJA's most advanced tank and unlike the previous medium tanks, was not based off the Chi-Ha design.  The Chi-To was influenced by other tank designs, most notably the T-34 and PzKpfw V.  As for operational performance, it was said to compare favorably with the Panzer IV and Sherman.  Supposedly, the Type 4 75mm AA Gun and can penetrate the front armor of M4 Sherman from 1,000m distance.






ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline BigPlay

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
Re: New GV
« Reply #10 on: February 17, 2009, 04:36:14 PM »
The Chi-To was the IJA's most advanced tank and unlike the previous medium tanks, was not based off the Chi-Ha design.  The Chi-To was influenced by other tank designs, most notably the T-34 and PzKpfw V.  As for operational performance, it was said to compare favorably with the Panzer IV and Sherman.  Supposedly, the Type 4 75mm AA Gun and can penetrate the front armor of M4 Sherman from 1,000m distance.

(Image removed from quote.)

(Image removed from quote.)


ack-ack


Did it ever see service?

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: New GV
« Reply #11 on: February 17, 2009, 06:14:08 PM »
Nope.  The Chi-To was reserved for homeland defense in case of an Allied invasion of the Japanese homelands.  But that wasn't the point I was making, just making the point that a Greyhound wouldn't 'maul' it like you claimed.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Unit791

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 315
Re: New GV
« Reply #12 on: February 17, 2009, 06:58:28 PM »
After deep consideration, i don't think Japanese tanks (that saw service mind you) should be added.  From what I've read, interestingly, machine guns could stop some like this



or this



I don't know about you but i wouldn't wanna be killed by a jeep in a tank :P
« Last Edit: February 17, 2009, 07:00:29 PM by Unit791 »
"Ideas are far more powerful than guns, we do not allow our enemies to have guns, why should be allow them to have ideas?"-
Josef Stalin


Mauser

Offline BigPlay

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
Re: New GV
« Reply #13 on: February 18, 2009, 10:52:31 AM »
Nope.  The Chi-To was reserved for homeland defense in case of an Allied invasion of the Japanese homelands.  But that wasn't the point I was making, just making the point that a Greyhound wouldn't 'maul' it like you claimed.


ack-ack

I was referring to the Japanese tanks that did see service, as everyone constantly refers to planes and tanks that saw service. In AH I can kill Panzer's with 2 shots with the M-8

Offline Babalonian

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5817
      • Pigs on the Wing
Re: New GV
« Reply #14 on: February 18, 2009, 06:13:20 PM »
After deep consideration, i don't think Japanese tanks (that saw service mind you) should be added.  From what I've read, interestingly, machine guns could stop some like this

(Image removed from quote.)

or this

(Image removed from quote.)

I don't know about you but i wouldn't wanna be killed by a jeep in a tank :P

I agree that they will be hanger queens in the MAs.  As for getting killed by a jeep in one... if it was even half as fast as a jeep maybe... but they weren't from what I understand.

But I also agree with the OP in that we need more GVs in this game for more variety.  Probably not some Japanese armor, but anyhting would help add more variety at this point.
-Babalon
"Let's light 'em up and see how they smoke."
POTW IIw Oink! - http://www.PigsOnTheWing.org

Wow, you guys need help.