« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Planes that AH doesn't have  (Read 1639 times)

Offline caldera

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6585
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #15 on: March 02, 2009, 01:36:45 PM »
Beaufighter
Mossy bomber
Russian bombers
A-26
G55
Betty
Judy
Oscar



Minelayers (note: these are not planes  :)).  Would be nice to keep cv groups from parking offshore and vulching you with auto-ack.
Logged
Snuggie - voted "Sexiest Man Alive" for the entire Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere!

Offline iTunes

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 472
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #16 on: March 02, 2009, 03:15:50 PM »
What I'd like to see:
G.55
Beaufighter

What I think we might end up with:
P47-C
P47-M
P51-A
P38-F
PBY Catalina
Logged
The Class Acts.
JG54 Grunherz
iTunes- UK's finest killer of ack huggers and runners, mixing business with girls and thrills.
JG54/ Manchester United- Nobody likes us-we don't care... Goes by the name of Wayne rooney http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EW-47c_8J4c

Offline Urchin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #17 on: March 02, 2009, 04:41:17 PM »
I don't think we will ever see the 4x20mm P-51, no matter how bad people want it. 

As far as the title of "hangar queen" goes, its just a subjective assessment of what sort of use I would expect to see. 

I wouldn't expect any of the planes I listed to be top 10.  Not even the P-63. 
Logged

Offline morfiend

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10471
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #18 on: March 02, 2009, 05:00:08 PM »
Quote from: Kweassa on March 02, 2009, 12:10:15 PM
My ol' list, fighters only.


VVS: The most unrespected national planeset in AH. The VVS rightfully deserves as many planes as LW or US or RAF planesets
* I-16: Nifty fun plane, an icon by itself symbolizing the early troubles of the VVS impacted by Barbarossa.
* Yak-7A: Started out as quikky substitute for the Yak-1  in shortage, then turned out to be the most common Yak variant of 1941
* Yak-1B: The evolutionary middle-phase of the 'light Yak' line which ultimately leads to the Yak-3. Great 1942 fighter
* Yak-3: The final stage of the 'light Yak', what the Yak-9U is to the 'heavy Yak' line
* Yak-9: The evolutionary middle-phase of the 'heavy Yak' line which ultimately leads to the Yak-9U. Great 1943 fighter
* LaGG-3: A noodlesplane which can't be left out in any real Eastern Front scenario/event
* La-5: The beginning of the 'Lala' legend, a much lacking predecessor of the La-5FN

IJN/IJAAF: So many pieces missing from the great Pacific War
* A6M-3: The big, missing, Zero between the 1941 A6M2 and the 1944 A6M5
* Ki-43: The most representative IJAAF fighter of the early war period
* Ki-44: A mid-war IJAAF fighter
* Ki-45: A Japanese twin-engine, heavy fighter, sorta like what the Bf110 is to the LW

LW: A most complete set, although perhaps one or two missing loops
* Fw190A-3: Not a crucial necessity, but a good, representative early war Fw190 suitable for post-BoB English Channel scenarios/events
* Bf109G-10: The high-alt, gap-closer between the Bf109G-14 and the Bf109K-4

RAF: Can't think of anything

USN/USAAF: Don't fediddlein' need any more

RA/other: Hey, they fought in the War, too. They should deserve it
* Re.2005: Comparable to the C.205, but substantially better high-alt performance. Excellent mid-war addition for the Regia Aeronautica.
* IAR.81C: The Romanian fighter, meeting 'their finest hour' at Ploesti
* D.520: A nifty French fighter almost being a match against the LW planes during the BoF
* M.S.406: The most numerous French noodlesplane during the BoF, good for BoF scenarios/events
* F2A: Have to satisfy the Finns, or else the world will come to Armageddon





 Great assement,the only thing I'd add would be to the LW,they are sorely lacking in highalt versions.
 So to this I'd add G6, G14 asm"s,simple to do just rework power curves to represent the high alt performance of these existing A/C.
Logged

Offline TUXC

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 257
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #19 on: March 02, 2009, 05:03:23 PM »
A few I don't think have been mentioned yet in this thread:

P-51A
P-38H
TBD
Spitfire XII
Fw 190A-6
Fw 190A-9
Ju 87G
Hs 129
Ju 188
He 177
Ju 52
Ju 88S
« Last Edit: March 02, 2009, 05:30:19 PM by TUXC »
Logged
Tuxc123

JG11

Offline Vulcan

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9920
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #20 on: March 02, 2009, 08:32:43 PM »
P-36.
Logged

Offline Helm

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 600
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #21 on: March 02, 2009, 10:01:09 PM »
There is no such thing as a "hanger queen".  The planes are perfectly willing to fly.  It's the pilots, who have to pass the "stones" check to fly them!     


Helm ...out
Logged
XO of ^"^Nazgul^"^
Proudly serving since campaign #13
"No Rain?" ...."No Rainbow, baby!" ....Bootsey Collins 2009

Offline fudgums

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4132
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #22 on: March 02, 2009, 10:07:33 PM »
ME 410 4 LIFE
Logged
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27

Offline Yarbles

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6320
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #23 on: March 03, 2009, 07:44:02 AM »
Meteor :aok
Logged
DFC/GFC/OAP



"Don't get into arguments with idiots, they drag you down to their level and then win from experience"
"He who can laugh at himself has mastered himself"

Offline Slade

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1884
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #24 on: March 03, 2009, 09:01:57 AM »
Many defend the fact that adding more planes is not the best investment for HT development dollars.  Some prefer pretty water etc..  Fair enough.  :salute

If HT added 75% of all these planes mentioned in this thread I'd just go right ahead and pre-pay the next three years right now.  Bam!

Enough said.

Slade
« Last Edit: March 03, 2009, 09:03:59 AM by Slade »
Logged
-- Flying as X15 --

Offline Cthulhu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2463
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #25 on: March 03, 2009, 10:09:18 AM »
Quote from: Slade on March 03, 2009, 09:01:57 AM
Many defend the fact that adding more planes is not the best investment for HT development dollars.  Some prefer pretty water etc..  Fair enough.  :salute

If HT added 75% of all these planes mentioned in this thread I'd just go right ahead and pre-pay the next three years right now.  Bam!

Enough said.

Slade
It's not the attractiveness of the water, it's the ability to better judge your altitude over it. If you tend to fight in the vertical, doing so at low altitude over the current water is a real pain.
Logged
"Think of Tetris as a metaphor for life:  You spend all your time trying to find a place for your long thin piece, then when you finally do, everything you've built disappears"

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #26 on: March 03, 2009, 11:43:45 AM »
http://www.naval-history.net/WW2RN25-BritishShipsAircraftCarriers.htm

Considering the size and scope of operations worldwide I'm kinda surprised there isn't more support for another British carrier born aircraft. An attacker would do fine. The Fairy Firefly would do even finer.http://www.warbirdalley.com/firefly.htm

One fighter plane is not a good enough representation for Great Britain. A huge naval power at the time.
Logged
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline Puck

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2980
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #27 on: March 03, 2009, 02:02:50 PM »
Isn't the wish list elsewhere?

*cough* F4U-4C *cough*
Logged
//c coad  c coad run  run coad run
main (){char _[]={"S~||(iuv{nkx%K9Y$hzhhd\x0c"},__
,___=1;for(__=___>>___;__<((___<<___<<___<<___<<___
)+(___<<___<<___<<___)-___);__+=___)putchar((_[__
])+(__/((___<<___)+___))-((___&
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »