Author Topic: Planes that AH doesn't have  (Read 1297 times)

Offline Urchin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5517
Planes that AH doesn't have
« on: March 01, 2009, 05:28:43 PM »
I think it is time for one of these. 

What planes are not yet in the game but could be added and see significant use? 

I'm going to go with the P-63.  Maybe the Me-410.

Other than that I really don't think there is anything that hasn't been added that wouldn't just be a hangar queen.

As far as hangar queens go...

Japan:

Ki-43
Ki-44
Ki-45
Ki-100
J2M
G4M

Germany:

Do 17
He 111
He 219 (I'd definitely play a BC scenario)
Night Fighter version of Ju 88 (C or G)

Italy:

C.200
CR.43
G.55
Re.2005

USSR:

I-16
Mig-3
Yak-3

UK:

Beaufighter
Gladiator
Beaufort
Defiant (lol)

US:

P-36
Buffalo


The game has actually come a long way.  Pretty much all the 1945 hot-rods made it in, and since that is all people want to fly anyway I guess that is pretty good.



Offline fudgums

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4045
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2009, 05:45:45 PM »
Disregard
« Last Edit: March 01, 2009, 07:30:59 PM by fudgums »
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2009, 06:33:05 PM »
A big gun version of the Ki-102 might not be a hangar queen.

UK:
Wellington B.Mk III
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline humble

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6434
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2009, 07:02:51 PM »
G.55 would not be a hanger queen...

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."-Pres. Thomas Jefferson

Offline Boozeman

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 482
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #4 on: March 01, 2009, 07:10:17 PM »

As far as hangar queens go...

 


Ki-44
J2M
G.55
Re.2005
Yak-3


 :huh

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #5 on: March 01, 2009, 07:27:06 PM »
I.A.R. 81c
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Cthulhu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2463
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #6 on: March 01, 2009, 07:54:14 PM »
I think it is time for one of these. 

What planes are not yet in the game but could be added and see significant use? 

I'm going to go with the P-63.  Maybe the Me-410.

Other than that I really don't think there is anything that hasn't been added that wouldn't just be a hangar queen.

As far as hangar queens go...

Japan:

Ki-43
Ki-44
Ki-45
Ki-100
J2M
G4M

Germany:

Do 17
He 111
He 219 (I'd definitely play a BC scenario)
Night Fighter version of Ju 88 (C or G)

Italy:

C.200
CR.43
G.55
Re.2005

USSR:

I-16
Mig-3
Yak-3

UK:

Beaufighter
Gladiator
Beaufort
Defiant (lol)

US:

P-36
Buffalo


The game has actually come a long way.  Pretty much all the 1945 hot-rods made it in, and since that is all people want to fly anyway I guess that is pretty good.



Insightful assessment. However...

Ki-45  :huh
Ki-100  :huh :huh

He 219 (I'd definitely play a BC scenario)  :huh

Yak-3  :huh :huh :huh :huh :huh :huh :huh -> Infinity. Or simply W :huh W!!

Beaufighter  :huh :huh
"Think of Tetris as a metaphor for life:  You spend all your time trying to find a place for your long thin piece, then when you finally do, everything you've built disappears"

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #7 on: March 01, 2009, 09:01:35 PM »
Yeah...Beaufighter! :aok
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #8 on: March 01, 2009, 09:54:18 PM »
Second that. A 300 mph torp runner with rockets and Hizookas  :devil
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline 715

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1835
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #9 on: March 02, 2009, 12:51:13 AM »
Yak-3 definitely would not be a hanger queen.  It's a better, and later, fighter than the Yak-9 and I see those often (model numbers are not in historical order, 3 came after 9).

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #10 on: March 02, 2009, 06:22:07 AM »
Sorry... lost me after p-63. :D
See Rule #4

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #11 on: March 02, 2009, 10:33:11 AM »
I dont think the G.55, MiG-3 or Yak-3 would end up as hanger queens.

All would probably get G2-ish use, by the numbers.

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #12 on: March 02, 2009, 10:40:02 AM »
109E-7
109F-2
109G-6/AS
109G-14/AS
109G-10
 :D
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline Blooz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3845
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #13 on: March 02, 2009, 11:58:08 AM »
Soviet Pe-2
White 9
JG11 Sonderstaffel

"The 'F' in 'communism' stands for food."

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
Re: Planes that AH doesn't have
« Reply #14 on: March 02, 2009, 12:10:15 PM »
My ol' list, fighters only.


VVS: The most unrespected national planeset in AH. The VVS rightfully deserves as many planes as LW or US or RAF planesets
* I-16: Nifty fun plane, an icon by itself symbolizing the early troubles of the VVS impacted by Barbarossa.
* Yak-7A: Started out as quikky substitute for the Yak-1  in shortage, then turned out to be the most common Yak variant of 1941
* Yak-1B: The evolutionary middle-phase of the 'light Yak' line which ultimately leads to the Yak-3. Great 1942 fighter
* Yak-3: The final stage of the 'light Yak', what the Yak-9U is to the 'heavy Yak' line
* Yak-9: The evolutionary middle-phase of the 'heavy Yak' line which ultimately leads to the Yak-9U. Great 1943 fighter
* LaGG-3: A noodlesplane which can't be left out in any real Eastern Front scenario/event
* La-5: The beginning of the 'Lala' legend, a much lacking predecessor of the La-5FN

IJN/IJAAF: So many pieces missing from the great Pacific War
* A6M-3: The big, missing, Zero between the 1941 A6M2 and the 1944 A6M5
* Ki-43: The most representative IJAAF fighter of the early war period
* Ki-44: A mid-war IJAAF fighter
* Ki-45: A Japanese twin-engine, heavy fighter, sorta like what the Bf110 is to the LW

LW: A most complete set, although perhaps one or two missing loops
* Fw190A-3: Not a crucial necessity, but a good, representative early war Fw190 suitable for post-BoB English Channel scenarios/events
* Bf109G-10: The high-alt, gap-closer between the Bf109G-14 and the Bf109K-4

RAF: Can't think of anything

USN/USAAF: Don't fediddlein' need any more

RA/other: Hey, they fought in the War, too. They should deserve it
* Re.2005: Comparable to the C.205, but substantially better high-alt performance. Excellent mid-war addition for the Regia Aeronautica.
* IAR.81C: The Romanian fighter, meeting 'their finest hour' at Ploesti
* D.520: A nifty French fighter almost being a match against the LW planes during the BoF
* M.S.406: The most numerous French noodlesplane during the BoF, good for BoF scenarios/events
* F2A: Have to satisfy the Finns, or else the world will come to Armageddon
« Last Edit: March 02, 2009, 12:17:20 PM by Kweassa »