Author Topic: Do you ever wonder why we got the Osty instead of the Wilberwind?  (Read 557 times)

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
  ????

   

   I know the osty has better range but can u imagine those 4 20mm canons firing!, heck i can't hit a thing over about 1.5k in the osty anyway, maybe it would be cool to have one of these in addation to our 2 AA vehicles  


                  Brady


------------------
 

[This message has been edited by brady (edited 12-30-2000).]

Offline Fishu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3789
Do you ever wonder why we got the Osty instead of the Wilberwind?
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2000, 12:54:00 PM »
That vehicle could have even more deflection kills at closer ranges than ostwind can..

TheWobble

  • Guest
Do you ever wonder why we got the Osty instead of the Wilberwind?
« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2000, 02:54:00 PM »
WILLLBBBUUURRR!!!!!!!

Offline Tony Williams

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 725
      • http://www.quarry.nildram.co.uk
Do you ever wonder why we got the Osty instead of the Wilberwind?
« Reply #3 on: December 31, 2000, 02:17:00 AM »
The 20mm Flakvierling quad mount was the best short-range AAA until the Soviet 23mm Shilka many years later.

Tony Williams
New book: Rapid Fire - The Development of Automatic Cannon, Heavy Machine Guns and their Ammunition for Armies, Navies and Air Forces.
Details on my military gun and ammunition website: http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~autogun/