Author Topic: Flight model abuse / grievance  (Read 7390 times)

Offline colmbo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2246
      • Photos
Re: Flight model abuse / grievance
« Reply #150 on: March 17, 2009, 08:48:22 AM »
:)  I was waiting for someone to make this observation.  I had imagined an incredulous "but you can't pull 52" of manifold pressure in a B-17!"

Well you can pull that much power...but it's probably best to have a spare jug or two in the hangar. <G>
Columbo

"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return."

Fate whispers to the warrior "You cannot withstand the storm" and the warrior whispers back "I AM THE STORM"

Offline Die Hard

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2205
Re: Flight model abuse / grievance
« Reply #151 on: March 17, 2009, 09:48:24 AM »
It would seem he wasn't terribly concerned about the engines since 49 inches/2500RPM is the Max allowable on the 1820 in the B-17.

He was more concerned with keeping up with his group. Falling out of formation and flying alone was nearly a death sentence over Germany.
It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence.

-Gandhi

Offline 2Slow

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 720
Re: Flight model abuse / grievance
« Reply #152 on: March 17, 2009, 10:26:58 AM »
He was more concerned with keeping up with his group. Falling out of formation and flying alone was nearly a death sentence over Germany.

I think you are correct.  Stragglers were on their own.

I recall one scenario where I was one of the very few to RTB to the UK from a raid over Germany.  I encouraged and implored the other mission members to keep up in formation.  Their reply was that they were not leaving anyone behind.  They dropped altitude and speed to form up on stragglers.

They were correct, they did not leave anyone behind.  They joined them in the fields of France or the POW camps.
2Slow
Secundum mihi , urbanus resurrectio
TANSTAAFL

Offline 100hooch

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 145
Re: Flight model abuse / grievance
« Reply #153 on: March 17, 2009, 02:37:32 PM »
See Rule #4
« Last Edit: March 18, 2009, 03:56:12 PM by Skuzzy »
"It's not our job to die for our country.  It's our job to make the other poor dumb sonofasqueak die for his!" -- Gen. George S. Patton

Offline 100hooch

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 145
Re: Flight model abuse / grievance
« Reply #154 on: March 17, 2009, 03:35:46 PM »
See Rule #4
« Last Edit: March 18, 2009, 03:56:40 PM by Skuzzy »
"It's not our job to die for our country.  It's our job to make the other poor dumb sonofasqueak die for his!" -- Gen. George S. Patton

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Flight model abuse / grievance
« Reply #155 on: March 17, 2009, 04:14:19 PM »
Karnak, the comment was made in the late '30s and carried well into the 40s. The entire US mentality of self-defended bombers was so erronous that they almost shut down all daytime bombing because of bomber losses. If the long range US fighters hadn't shown up when they did, our bomber losses would not have been sustainable.

Stoney: Quit trolling. You know the issue at hand and yet bring up examples that don't fit, and waiting for responses that cry "foul!" (basically, you're trolling). A bomber blows an engine so throttles the rest up. Yeah... RIGHT... that really proves your point (insert oldrolleyes here). I've explained why your comments are not realistic or logical and you come back with a troll?

As for the 100BG pilots. Heeeeere we go. I did not bring this up until they started swearing and taunting at me. They're crying foul at me because one of their pilots stick stirred and warped his way out of certain death. It was 100Bull. He was flying level in a p-47 and bouncing left and right, up and down without any change in pitch or orientation, flat spinning while zoom climbing UP. I and several others witnessed his BS. I told him he was as close to cheating as possible and if I had been rolling film he'd have been reported to HTC. I asked the others that saw it and they did not roll film either, but did see it.

***HE*** then proceeded to brag that he truly knew how to fly this plane, and that he was some sort of master (of what I won't say) and he went on repeatedly bragging about how he could take me to the TA and show me how to do the exact same thing with some practice. He was literally climbing while spinning out like a gyro, and recovered higher than he entered, also bouncing up and down and left/right so hard that I (200d behind him, steady, lined up, not closing, kill-shot-ready) couldn't even ping his arse. So far he was bouncing from outside one side of my gunsight to the outside of the opposite side of it. I *REALLY* wish I'd got that on film. It was 100% intentional.

Well, I used PMs but apparently they've been gabbing about it on their forums because whattayaknow here come all the 100s swearing and cussing at me in his defense. I didn't even bring this up, they did otherwise it wouldn't have intruded into a serious issue with AH2's gameplay (bomber performance). I did not whine for an hour about your tactics, as you say. Both of Hooch's posts are antagonistic, hostile, and quite defensive, and quite outside the point of this thread. Bull's post is just plain insulting and defensive, and also has nothing regarding this thread/topic. They ought to be removed from the thread so it may stay on track.


Diehard, you didn't read my previous posts: Unless you happen to be randomly above and in front of any bomber stream in this game, they can more often than not do their deeds and get home before you can kill them. We're not talking DGS (a scenario for other folks, FYI) where you knew what they were, where they were coming, how many they would be, and were already planning to intercept them 20 minutes before you knew they were over your territory. Even in DGS the 190a8s have major issues you don't mention. At 32k they are barely 20mph faster than B17s. They gain maybe 10mph by dropping some more. Making diving attacks on bombers this high just isn't possible in this game. The very act of climbing up to get ABOVE them lets them move so far outside of icon range they are effectively scott-free and have gotten away. Once a bomber is so far away from you he's outside icon range he can change course, rtb, whatever he wants, and thus you've lost him. Letting him get so far away is effectively letting him go.

Offline chewie86

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 445
Re: Flight model abuse / grievance
« Reply #156 on: March 17, 2009, 05:38:20 PM »
I sent an e-mail to HTC just now, after witnessing one of the worst abuses of the bomber flight model in this game, and sent in the following grievance. I'm posting it here as well.

The 100BG have been pulling some deliberate abuse of the flight models lately. I won't go into some of the other cases, but this one regards the bomber flight model so I will use them, as they are on the film in question.

Are you accusing a squad about flying heavies too high ?
Did u read my previous posts, and the majority of community's replies ?

Dont blame hooch and bull about their replies, as they've got strong feelings toward our squad they just (and so I did) felt insulted. I'm sure anybody would had too if in our place.

[jk]Anyways IF that was an abuse. It was the BEST abuse of the "bomber flight model". not the worst. LOL  [/jk]
Lube & Shame "peneduro"
My AH2 videos
SDL SEASON 1 Champions:
Loose Deuce
, ~Black Leather & Pink Slippers~

Offline o08880o

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Flight model abuse / grievance
« Reply #157 on: March 17, 2009, 05:40:59 PM »
If i have an extra life, I ll loan it to you KRUSTY.. GET A LIFE oh hell.. you should at least GET A CLUE from the responses. It's a freaking game.. You arent a real pilot.. accept it... Go to a drug rehab or AA meeting for the heck of it. I am sure they'll teach you how to accept your suckiness.  :rock :rock

Whew... back to reality.

Offline o08880o

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Flight model abuse / grievance
« Reply #158 on: March 17, 2009, 05:46:21 PM »
Regradless of Krusty's success or lack of success in attacking those bombers, he is very correct in stating that there are problems with the flight.  Between the flight model, the high speed bombing runs, %25 or %50 fuel loadouts, and the precision bombing from 25k+, there are lots of issues.  They all tie in together to create the fiasco of "simulation" bombing.  Bombers are far more capable in this sim/game than they were in the real deal. 

He isnt whining.  He made a good point.  Disagree with him all you want, but some of you need show yourself some dignity and stop acting like 5 year olds.  If you dont like what his point, then back up what you say and simply adding your opinion doesnt cut it. 

Bomber didnt drop ord at 280mph.  They didnt take a %25 or %50 fuel loadout.  Lancs and B17's didnt do dive bombing runs from 1200ft vs a single gv.  Shall I go on?

$15/month, and you want a full 100% accurate simulation? Have fun deal with it.  :devil

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Flight model abuse / grievance
« Reply #159 on: March 17, 2009, 06:19:12 PM »
Hmm I give this 90 Krusties on the BS scale.



 :aok
See Rule #4

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: Flight model abuse / grievance
« Reply #160 on: March 17, 2009, 06:30:04 PM »
Popcorn, I tell ye, popcorn.
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline 100hooch

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 145
Re: Flight model abuse / grievance
« Reply #161 on: March 17, 2009, 07:31:12 PM »
See Rule #4
« Last Edit: March 18, 2009, 03:41:10 PM by Skuzzy »
"It's not our job to die for our country.  It's our job to make the other poor dumb sonofasqueak die for his!" -- Gen. George S. Patton

Offline Golfer

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6314
Re: Flight model abuse / grievance
« Reply #162 on: March 17, 2009, 07:41:22 PM »
Hooch you went from a respectable position to this silly mudslinging.  If you keep your responses somewhat professional you might receive a better reception.

Offline caldera

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6437
Re: Flight model abuse / grievance
« Reply #163 on: March 17, 2009, 07:49:58 PM »
ravings of a lunatic

100hooch, you ought to follow 100maru's lead and handle this with some civility instead of coming off like 100sweetheart.
I don't have a dog in this fight but your posts are not helping your squad one bit.
"Then out spake brave Horatius, the Captain of the gate:
 To every man upon this earth, death cometh soon or late.
 And how can man die better, than facing fearful odds.
 For the ashes of his fathers and the temples of his Gods."

Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: Flight model abuse / grievance
« Reply #164 on: March 17, 2009, 08:43:38 PM »
Stoney: Quit trolling. You know the issue at hand and yet bring up examples that don't fit, and waiting for responses that cry "foul!" (basically, you're trolling). A bomber blows an engine so throttles the rest up. Yeah... RIGHT... that really proves your point (insert oldrolleyes here). I've explained why your comments are not realistic or logical and you come back with a troll?

Ok, although I wasn't trolling, I'll give you the first quote since it was the result of mechnical failure.  The second quote was not--it was a legitimate operational use of military power during a bomb run.  I guess it takes too long to actually read some of the resources I quote from or else you would know that.

I'm done.
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech