Author Topic: MY 3 WISHES  (Read 1136 times)

Offline detch01

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1788
Re: MY 3 WISHES
« Reply #15 on: March 19, 2009, 03:47:21 PM »
Wingnutt do you really WANT a bomber capable of quickly cruising to 20k, and flying fast enough up there that most fighters couldn't catch it? Is that REALLY what you want for the main? B29 would be unbalancing for gameplay. And thats why we don't have it.
Well, that would give Krusty's posts some basis in reality though, wouldn't it? :lol

asw
asw
Latrine Attendant, 1st class
semper in excretio, solum profundum variat

Offline Ciaphas

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1955
      • DethKlokDave
Re: MY 3 WISHES
« Reply #16 on: March 19, 2009, 04:06:35 PM »
To be realistic the there should be only on thing on their mind and that is the constant improvement of the service that they offer. Since these forums are a cesspool and are moderated on a so-so basis they should have plenty of time to update aspects that are being asked for. If they need to expand to do this then they should. there are many knowledgeable people in this community that do model, texture animate, build maps and a few who are probably pretty adept with programming. They should look with in the community to give the community what it wants..
10.(Jabo)/JG 26 Nuisance Raids Scenario


Offline Wingnutt

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1665
Re: MY 3 WISHES
« Reply #17 on: March 19, 2009, 05:44:21 PM »
Wingnutt do you really WANT a bomber capable of quickly cruising to 20k, and flying fast enough up there that most fighters couldn't catch it? Is that REALLY what you want for the main? B29 would be unbalancing for gameplay. And thats why we don't have it.

Main area's are only one part of the AH experience, and have been quite well catered to up to this point.
High time that Special events, and early war got some love.




quickly cruising to 20K? 

its climbe rate is only a slight bit better than  a lancaster, and worse than a B17...  it would be the second slowest climbing bomber in the game.

and at 358MPH max at 25K there are more than a few fighters that could catch it at altitude.

its rear turret is 20MM OH NOESS!!!!  but ... it only carried 100 rounds of ammo in the tail *GASP!*  furthermore in later variants the rear turret was dropped all together.



seems like you (and many others) get your perception of the B29 from TV. it wasn't the super bomber it is billed as by the history channel..

granted it should still be perked due to its huge bomb load.. and decent speed..  but it would be far from the untouchable super bomber people keep billing it as..   It wouldent turn the MA on its head any more than the 262, 163, or 234 do,  it would just be another (good) option spend perkies on, and a fun target to shoot at.  nothing more.




Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: MY 3 WISHES
« Reply #18 on: March 19, 2009, 05:47:04 PM »
...#3   new maps, new maps are needed, this game is getting stale. use some of the cool scenario maps, anything different would be better than more of the same

You can do that...

(Updated download link at the bottom of the thread/page.)
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,196120.0.html

Have fun!
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline seano

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 212
Re: MY 3 WISHES
« Reply #19 on: March 19, 2009, 08:09:26 PM »
pby at a spwn point a little further out would be cool also

Offline Cajunn

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 723
Re: MY 3 WISHES
« Reply #20 on: March 20, 2009, 12:47:40 AM »
This is a Wish list so anything goes, and as for as the B-29, I think it would be a good add, if they would be worried about a bomber unbalancing the game they would of never added the me262 or the 163. And maybe it will take the fights to higher altitudes, and it would put another dimension in the game.   
“The important thing [in tactics] is to suppress the enemy's useful actions but allow his useless actions. However, doing this alone is defensive.”

Miyamoto Musashi (1584-1645)
Japanese Samurai & Philosopher

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: MY 3 WISHES
« Reply #21 on: March 20, 2009, 10:29:54 AM »
Wingnutt do you really WANT a bomber capable of quickly cruising to 20k, and flying fast enough up there that most fighters couldn't catch it? Is that REALLY what you want for the main? B29 would be unbalancing for gameplay. And thats why we don't have it.

No has ever presented a good explanation of what "unbalancing" actually means; most can only point to examples.  But the perk system is supposed to make a non-issue of "unbalancing" aircraft, so I don't think that's why we don't have it.
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline Wingnutt

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1665
Re: MY 3 WISHES
« Reply #22 on: March 20, 2009, 11:16:27 AM »
I think it should only be enabled at large airflields or zone bases..  or something along those lines..

given that it would be perked, not available at every field, and does not have the performance many people seem to think it does,  it would be no threat to game play..

also consider.. it was BIG.. very big.. but also not as tough as say a B17 or even a Lanc..  so you have a larger target, that takes less damaged to down..

Offline USRanger

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10325
      • BoP Home
Re: MY 3 WISHES
« Reply #23 on: March 21, 2009, 11:43:00 PM »
My gift to the community for all future B-29 threads :devil

Axis vs Allies Staff Member
☩ JG11 Sonderstaffel ☩
Flying 'Black[Death] 10' ☩JG11☩

Only the Proud, Only the Strong Ne Desit Virtus

Offline Boxboy

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 740
Re: MY 3 WISHES
« Reply #24 on: March 22, 2009, 10:15:44 AM »
And an arena for it to fight in the "gasp" PTO no german Iron allowed  :rock
Sub Lt BigJim
801 Sqn FAA
Pilot