I think there should be about double the manned guns at all the bases, AND have a few at each strat target.
The abuses of "milk runnin" and airfield vulching get a bit old when their is no manner of able defense.
I think that's a terrific, wonderful, stupendous, excellent, magnificent, superb, breathtaking, amazing, astonishing, fantastic, marvelous idea.
What makes you think a manned gun is any harder to kill than an auto gun?
Are the additional manned guns going to replace auto guns or add to them? If you replace auto guns with manned guns and there is no one to man them then you are effectively making a base
more vulnerable.
The only advantage to manned guns is they stay dead for a much shorter period. However, in a situation where "there is no manner of able defense" it probably will not help.
Actually, the VH does not stay down any longer than manned guns do. Wirbles, Ostis, and M-16s would be just as available.
But really, it's a terrific, wonderful, stupendous, excellent, magnificent, superb, breathtaking, amazing, astonishing, fantastic, marvelous idea.
wrongway