You've already demonstrated a complete ignorance in other threads for the combat aspect of this game and will argue against advocates of it regardless of the argument or the large quantities of logic contained. You've 'picked your side' and even if you have no counter argument (like this one in particular) you will just respond with 'no, no, you are wrong'. Pathetic.
I haven't picked a side.
Their can be no "counter" argument to people that refuse to beleive that there are aspects of the game that other people like.
I like all aspects of the game. A great fight though rare is one of the best.
Though most potential good fights are ruined by guys looking for a kill, not a fight. ( system: major ace has landed 6 kills in a tempest)
Guys that fly like that are more of a problem in the game than Noe missions are.
Detecting and upping against an Noe mission is another great thrill for me and others.
Though you can't catch them all, when you do its alot of fun, win or lose.
The way the same ol guys keep talking on these BBs, you would think that Noe is the only culprit in avoiding precious air combat.
If someone is picked, or someone else "egresses" etc. etc. etc. it is called "flying smart" and thats fine with me.
They have acheived their objective.
The same can be said for Noe missions.
To me, its not that big of a problem in the game.
If I see an Noe happening that I can't get to, and its successful in taking a base, I really couldn't care less, I will continue what I was doing and move on.
I can't convince you that its not that big a deal, and you can't convince me that it is, no matter how many times you keep repeating yourselves over and over and over again.
Just because you keep beating people over the head with the same old thing doesn't make it true. Tower generals? Please.
You're entitled to your opinion on the subject and so is everyone else.
I'm just not gonna force my opinion on you over and over and over again, hoping you'll finally see it my way.
