« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Why not Gliders?  (Read 2251 times)

Offline phatzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3734
      • No Crying
Re: Why not Gliders?
« Reply #15 on: April 15, 2009, 10:40:46 PM »
Logged
No thank you Turkish, I'm sweet enough.

Offline zuii

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 235
Re: Why not Gliders?
« Reply #16 on: April 15, 2009, 11:07:07 PM »
KI-84ib
KI-84ic
Logged
39th FS "Cobra in the Clouds"

Empress Zhang: "I love cannons"
(it was not all fun and games inside the forbidden city)

Offline Twincam

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: Why not Gliders?
« Reply #17 on: April 15, 2009, 11:16:38 PM »
Take the TA -152H to 20K,turn off the motor, now got your self a glider  :aok
Logged
Jeszcze Polska Nie Zgineła

Offline Larry

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6123
Re: Why not Gliders?
« Reply #18 on: April 16, 2009, 12:24:38 AM »
Quote from: TEShaw on April 15, 2009, 03:53:23 PM
Furthermore, it appears he's urinating upon the glider.


I'm betting its a drunken hobo that wondered into the factory.
Logged
Once known as ''TrueKill''.
JG 54 "Grünherz"
July '18 KOTH Winner

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
Re: Why not Gliders?
« Reply #19 on: April 16, 2009, 12:31:43 AM »
Quote from: Slate on April 15, 2009, 11:47:26 AM
  Shhhhhhhhhhh I thought I heard something. :uhoh

So much for my infiltration behind the NOE missions, being a spi.    :noid
Logged
-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline BaDkaRmA158Th

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2542
Re: Why not Gliders?
« Reply #20 on: April 16, 2009, 12:46:02 AM »
Well, we have tank spawns & PT spawns, why not have glider spawns a mile or two off a base 5-10k at speed, if say all the field guns are down, and the troop barracks are all down, or more. Could also have the ability to land light tanks or jeeps.



Would be fun as heck.
Logged
~383Rd RTC/CH BW/AG~
BaDfaRmA

My signature says "Our commitment to diplomacy will never inhibit our willingness to kick a$s."

Offline TEShaw

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 817
Re: Why not Gliders?
« Reply #21 on: April 16, 2009, 01:00:01 AM »
Stephen Ambrose describes the June 6, 1944 glider landings at the Orne River bridge and Caen Cannal as the best flying in World War II.  (His book, Pegasus Bridge.)

There are now markers established on that river-bank, indicating where the gliders landed that night in the dark.

Truely impressive.

Precision glider landing with troops in AH2 could be interesting. Precision and possible rough terrain being operative point and success modifiers.
Logged

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
Re: Why not Gliders?
« Reply #22 on: April 16, 2009, 05:16:44 AM »
I think the gliders would be hard to implement, since they would have to be towed.

An idea that might work is having a glider-drone follow your C-47 (just like in a bomber formation, but just 1 drone). If you bail out of your C-47, you'll spawn inside the Glider and do your thing :)

Not sure if the C-47 should also be able to drop troops though.
If added, the glider would need to be perked (who'd fly a 'lone' C-47 after that?)
Logged

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23889
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: Why not Gliders?
« Reply #23 on: April 16, 2009, 07:11:06 AM »
Quote from: phatzo on April 15, 2009, 10:40:46 PM
whats it called snailman

Blohm & Voss BV 40
Logged
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline Whitey33

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1020
Re: Why not Gliders?
« Reply #24 on: April 16, 2009, 07:21:55 AM »
Give us JU-52.
Logged
www.ilmavoimat.fi/index_en.php  Finnish Air Force

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10179
Re: Why not Gliders?
« Reply #25 on: April 16, 2009, 09:03:03 AM »
I think it would be a great add. Another exciting way for me to be shot down! :rock
Logged
CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
Re: Why not Gliders?
« Reply #26 on: April 16, 2009, 10:56:18 AM »
Quote from: Whitey33 on April 16, 2009, 07:21:55 AM
Give us JU-52.

That's not a glider.
And if you knew, you're off topic.
Come to think of it, I don't think it ever towed a glider.
Logged

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23889
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: Why not Gliders?
« Reply #27 on: April 16, 2009, 11:07:41 AM »
Quote from: frank3 on April 16, 2009, 10:56:18 AM
Come to think of it, I don't think it ever towed a glider.

Ju 52's were used very frequently for towing gliders.
Was the standard plane to tow the DFS 230.

« Last Edit: April 16, 2009, 11:47:07 AM by Lusche »
Logged
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Re: Why not Gliders?
« Reply #28 on: April 16, 2009, 11:46:41 AM »
Logged

Offline Reaper90

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Why not Gliders?
« Reply #29 on: April 16, 2009, 12:29:12 PM »
Quote from: waystin2 on April 16, 2009, 09:03:03 AM
Another exciting way for me to be shot down! :rock

w3rd.

TheReaperGlider, NEW and IMPROVED!! Now with more bullet attractant smell!
Logged
Floyd
'Murican dude in a Brit Squad flying Russian birds, drinking Canadian whiskey
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »