Author Topic: Changes that I would like to see to existing AH aircraft  (Read 1166 times)

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Changes that I would like to see to existing AH aircraft
« on: November 07, 2001, 09:41:00 PM »
Fw190A-8:
1: Have the option to carry 4 MG 151/20s in underwing pods

Fw190D-9:
1: Have the R4M rockets as an option

Fw190F-8:
1: Have the option to carry 1 160kg bomb under each wing
2: Have the option to carry Panzershrek rockets under each wing
3: Have the option to carry Panzerblitz I rockets under each wing
4: Have the option to carry 3 55mm AP rockets under each wing

Il2-M:
1: Have the option for the 2 37mm cannon
2: Have the option to carry cluster bombs

Ju88A-4:
1: Have the option for 2 1000kg bombs
2: Have the option for 2 1000kg bombs and 2 500kg bombs

Ki61-I-KAIc:
1: Have the Attack option enabled

Me262A:
1: Have the R4M rockets as an option

Mosquito Mk VI:
1: Have the 2 500lb bombs in the bomb bay as an option
2: Have the tailwheel deploy and retract

P-38L:
1: Have the 2 2,000lb bomb option

[ 11-07-2001: Message edited by: Karnak ]
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline pdog_109

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 232
Changes that I would like to see to existing AH aircraft
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2001, 09:59:00 PM »
Uhh doesn't the IL-2 already gots 2 x 37mm?
I'd like some bombs on the 205 please, at least a 250lber as it had provisions for it.

Offline Tac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4085
Changes that I would like to see to existing AH aircraft
« Reply #2 on: November 08, 2001, 12:40:00 AM »
P-38L:

2k bomb loadout
FIX the dive flaps (I guess pyro didnt get my 5 meg e-mail on it *sigh*)
DISABLE the auto-flap retract (or put it as a toggable feature, like combat trim). There is nothing more annoying than the flaps pulling you into a spin in the middle of a fight because they retracted on their own (a spin which should not happen in the 1st place anyway!). I'd rather have my flaps RIPPED OFF than have them get me killed...at least I can still fight with my flaps ripped out.

Global (affects all planes) : Improve damage model. Right now things either are untouched or blown out. How about an in-between?

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Changes that I would like to see to existing AH aircraft
« Reply #3 on: November 08, 2001, 12:53:00 AM »
I am prety shure that no P 38 saw action that was capable of carying a 2x 2000 lb bomb load out. I looked through several of my book's 2 p 38 book's and America's 100,000 and others and they said that they all could cary 2 1,600lb bomb's but I found no evenence of a 1,600lb bomb in the US inventory(any proof other wise would help). Aparentaly the model that could cary the 2x 2,000lb bombs never saw combat.

  Cluster munitions for everybody would be nice though :)

 And the rest of your list as well.

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Changes that I would like to see to existing AH aircraft
« Reply #4 on: November 08, 2001, 12:55:00 AM »
Karnak the 190F8 carried at least twice the  3 55mm rockets you ask for under the wing. They had racks of 6 or 8 under each wing.

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
Changes that I would like to see to existing AH aircraft
« Reply #5 on: November 08, 2001, 01:57:00 AM »
I'm all for "DISABLE AUTOMATIC FLAP RETRACTION"..

 Flap management is also an important issue included in the big picture of managing the plane itself..

 Please.. disable the autoamtic flap retraction..

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Changes that I would like to see to existing AH aircraft
« Reply #6 on: November 08, 2001, 02:54:00 AM »
pdog_109,

No, the Il-2 has 2 23mm cannon.

brady,

I assumed because it is so often requested that it was true.  At least one of my books states that as well, but its not a very good book.

GRUNHERZ,

That was based on one of Wotan's posts in an earlier thread about the F-8.  His post stated that it could carry 6.  I'm all for giving it however many it could carry.

All,

Yes, removing the auto flap retraction seems like a good idea.  We don't have auto gear retraction after all.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Naudet

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 729
Changes that I would like to see to existing AH aircraft
« Reply #7 on: November 08, 2001, 03:32:00 AM »
Karnak, all nice ideas.

But there is a little fault with the F8.

I bought a book this week, and there a east front FW190 Jabo pilot stated:

"We could either take 24 R4M Rockets or 14 55mm Panzerschreck Rockets with us."

Both use a wooden Zero lenght starting rail under each wing.

Btw notice he also speaks of the 55mm Rockets (that ur AP 55mm rocket Karnak) as Panzerschreck. From what the picks show it seem to me like a modified R4M.

And to all that state this was just a rarely used option.

This pilot was out of a So called Panzerjagdgruppe. The had a (Pz) after the roman I, II or III. to indicate that they were specialized in "PanzerKnacken" (Tankbusting) and used rocket for it.

Offline LLv34_Snefens

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 728
      • Lentolaivue 34
Changes that I would like to see to existing AH aircraft
« Reply #8 on: November 08, 2001, 09:55:00 AM »
Bombs for the Macchi's!

------------------
Ltn. Snefens
RO, Lentolaivue 34
My AH homepage
 
Snefens, Lentolaivue 34.
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

"Luck beats skill anytime"

Offline AcId

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1090
Changes that I would like to see to existing AH aircraft
« Reply #9 on: November 08, 2001, 10:26:00 AM »
I myself wondered about the "Auto-flap-retraction", to be honest, I figured since it was modelled it was a real feature on WWII aircraft that HT was sticking to. I based that on the level of realism that seems to be present. Don't laugh, I don't claim to know a lot about AC of that era, and I'm not a pilot. It did seem real to me atleast. I would think if they didn't have "Auto-flap" we shouldn't either, seems to me an insignificant game consession. just my 2cents though.

Offline BenDover

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5803
Changes that I would like to see to existing AH aircraft
« Reply #10 on: November 08, 2001, 12:48:00 PM »
incendiary bombs,nuff said

Offline -ammo-

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5124
Changes that I would like to see to existing AH aircraft
« Reply #11 on: November 08, 2001, 04:14:00 PM »
wow Karnak, you didnt ask for the spit9 to be fixed? I figured that would be at the top of your list :) Would be at mine. Personally, I would like to see a LF, or a Spit XIII. In the current one, delete the .50 cal option altogether.
Commanding Officer, 56 Fighter Group
Retired USAF - 1988 - 2011

Offline Tilt

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
      • FullTilt
Changes that I would like to see to existing AH aircraft
« Reply #12 on: November 08, 2001, 04:26:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak:
Fw190A-8:
 Message edited by: Karnak ]

La7
1)Add slat graphics
2)Lower the full flap level stall speed by 20 mph
3)Increase the rate of departure at the lower speed
4)Correct the rear armoured glass frame

La 5FN
1)Add slat graphics
2)Lower the full flap level stall speed by 20 mph
3)Increase the rate of departure at the lower speed
4)Correct the rear armoured glass frame

Tilt

PTAB 2.5-1.5

The 192 mini bombs used regularlyon the IL2M3 would be very neat and may bring it back to greater arena use. they were dropped from a 100 metres and could cover an area som 70 m x 15 metres.

1st used at Kursk the Pilots of 291 SHAP destroyed 15 enemy tanks with 6 aircraft in one mission. Within 5 days the 291st had (claims for) destroyed or damaged 422 enemy tanks.
Ludere Vincere

Offline Tac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4085
Changes that I would like to see to existing AH aircraft
« Reply #13 on: November 08, 2001, 09:48:00 PM »
P-38s did carry 2X2k bombs into combat. Usually taking the low MG+Cannon ammo load. I'll try and get you a pic of a 38 with 2k bombs before a mission.

Offline F4UDOA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1731
      • http://mywebpages.comcast.net/markw4/index.html
Changes that I would like to see to existing AH aircraft
« Reply #14 on: November 09, 2001, 09:32:00 AM »
Err,

The F4U and F6F had "blow up flaps" so don't fix those. I'll check and see if the P-38 had the same.