Simple not refutable facts.
1. Before arena split AH was not longer growing.
2. After arena split AH started growing fast than it ever had.
Now there really is only 1 reason for this, more people are having fun, and thus subscribe.
1st of all it's CM#1, I figure Steve isn't clueless...
Have a nice weekend? I been without power on and off since I got home on Sunday. Come to find out a Tornado hit our town.
The only questions that has never been answered are these. There are different arena's. People go to different arenas which please them.
I understand that is not refutable.
Before split AH was not growing. After arena split it's growing? Not refutable...
Don't the same people still go into the arena of their choice? With the exception of the LW arenas? You get the same small group in EW and MW. You have roughly the same numbers in the DA? There is FSO and scenarios. Even a TA for new folks to learn.
IF and I say IF Blue ends up being overflow for most folks trying to get into Orange except for a small group that prefer a small fight with a very limited number of people but still want to use LW planes, isn't HTC already giving them that? If they don't want to fly in Orange no one is asking them to fly there. They can go Blue as they wish. You say yourself both are identical. The only difference is the number of people.
Why would it be so farfetched to believe that if the number of Orange participants grew because they wanted to fly in a large arena yet the Blue remained available for those people who want to have fun fighting a smaller group and still have the other arenas for their use?
Finally, why, those who would leave because of no split have no reason to leave because there is a split arena and they have a choice of which one they wish to fly in?
It would make sense if everyone is happy then no one leaves unless RL hits them between the eye. It also makes sense that people will continue to come to the game begin to learn, eventually chose what suits them in game play and do it.
It's a WIN-WIN situation and no where did I personally either thru deception or otherwise say ONE ARENA ONLY. Two are fine, just why the CAP?
Your response is also irrefutable...Because if there was an unlimited CAP on one of the arenas everyone would go there!!! That's not my statement for 1 arena. It's yours. If everyone wants to be there then people leave. That's also your statement. WHAT!!!!
That is WHY I'M confused! If everyone is happy why would there be a loss of people to the game???
To put it Johnny Cochrans immortal words, "it just don't make sense".
[qoute]Does it make any real difference why? Game play issues I will discuss, but do I really need to discuss all HTC's financial's ?[/quote]
I would hope no one is interested in HTC from a personal finance point of view as its no ones biz, other than it continues to operate. IF it requires additional capitol to grow the game to make for uncapped arenas everywhere it would MAKE SENSE to delay the expenditures giving the Countries monetary troubles. IF that was the case it, too, is no ones business...
To say capping promotes growth is kind of like dealing in opposites. Cap indicates putting a limit on something. Grow indicates expansion. The two would appear to be mutually exclusive....
CM#1