Author Topic: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD  (Read 7521 times)

Offline thndregg

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4032
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #15 on: May 12, 2009, 07:48:37 PM »
Guess I'm screwed when this is implimented. My 5 year old ATI 9800 runs at a 12 framerate on that test program. My comp won't accept a new video card as AGP slots are outmoded. I simply won't have $$$$ to shell out on building a new machine until next year. :(
Former C.O. 91st Bombardment Group (Heavy)
"The Ragged Irregulars"

Offline texastc316

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1774
      • Mighty 316th
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #16 on: May 12, 2009, 07:56:32 PM »
get you one for $300 on ebay. they are there, just got to get creative when searching.
TexsTC-CO/Court Jester-Mighty 316th FS "CREEPING DEATH"  in MA/FSO

The eager pilots are not experienced. And the experienced not eager.

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

Offline Easyscor

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10899
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #17 on: May 12, 2009, 08:02:23 PM »
White water. Might be my driver?

This was taken from where A1 would be in-game.

Easy in-game again.
Since Tour 19 - 2001

Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #18 on: May 12, 2009, 08:45:08 PM »
Anyone notice the absence of the 15K haze/mist/cloud layer?

I think it’s a good idea to leave it out, just  like in scenarios. It creates a sort of visible barrier that many people don’t like to cross. I’m sure we will see a lot more medium to high altitude fights with it removed.



"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline Greebo

  • Skinner Team
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7008
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #19 on: May 12, 2009, 09:02:29 PM »
I like that the rock looks like rock now, the old terrain was green everywhere. The water reflections look very nice too.

Perhaps a future version of the tester could have some way of forcing it to use the low detail terrain for those who have lousy framerate or other problems with the good looking stuff. Just for reassurance they will still be able to play the game when the new version comes out.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2009, 09:05:08 PM by Greebo »

Offline Hajo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6034
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #20 on: May 12, 2009, 09:30:28 PM »
Terrain was gorgeous!

Unfortunately I have a PC that is only 4 months old with dual 4850s running Crossfire and my FR was 17.15

in my monitors native resolution of 1920X1200 32 bit.
- The Flying Circus -

Offline Hajo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6034
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #21 on: May 12, 2009, 09:33:04 PM »
oopps
- The Flying Circus -

Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #22 on: May 12, 2009, 09:48:40 PM »
Terrain was gorgeous!

Unfortunately I have a PC that is only 4 months old with dual 4850s running Crossfire and my FR was 17.15

in my monitors native resolution of 1920X1200 32 bit.

The FPS takes about 10-30 seconds to load the correct numbers.

You should be getting crazy FPS, not 17.15!



"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline StokesAk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3665
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #23 on: May 12, 2009, 10:04:42 PM »
It was gray before, this is much better.

Have you guys taken a look at the airfileds are they different?

Strokes

Offline Hajo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6034
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #24 on: May 12, 2009, 10:05:55 PM »
Kazaa:

I had ATI control center started at Boot.

Used msconfig and omitted it from Boot list.

FR went from 17.15 to 163.8  1900X1200 native resolution and game resolution I use.

<phew>

tip!  Don''t have ATI Control center running!  Make sure it is not started on Boot!
« Last Edit: May 12, 2009, 10:07:36 PM by Hajo »
- The Flying Circus -

Offline Banshee7

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6593
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #25 on: May 12, 2009, 10:55:23 PM »
Guess I'm screwed when this is implimented. My 5 year old ATI 9800 runs at a 12 framerate on that test program. My comp won't accept a new video card as AGP slots are outmoded. I simply won't have $$$$ to shell out on building a new machine until next year. :(


Don't worry.  I'm in the process of even finding out if I can upgrade....7 yr old computer, 5 FR :)
Tours 86 - 296

Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #26 on: May 12, 2009, 11:54:56 PM »
If HTC have new clouds next on the list then I'm going to be really, really happy. :pray :O



"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline eh

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 314
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #27 on: May 13, 2009, 12:50:25 AM »
FR 65.60
Res 1024x768

Win XP 64 bit
AMD 64 4000+ 2GB RAM
NVIDIA GeForce 6800, 256 Mb

Used original test file. Everything looks as it should. Not bad for an old machine.

Offline JimmyC

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5196
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #28 on: May 13, 2009, 05:00:24 AM »
for Stokes

CO 71 "Eagle" Squadron RAF
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy."

Offline Ruah

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1083
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #29 on: May 13, 2009, 06:24:53 AM »
so my 512 mb graphics card will be able to take this?

Kommando Nowotny
I/JG 77, 2nd Staffel
Mediterranean Maelstrom
HORRIDO