Author Topic: B-17 Variants  (Read 1956 times)

Offline Baggy

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 193
Re: B-17 Variants
« Reply #15 on: May 15, 2009, 03:47:47 PM »
They're mingers without that tail fillet!

Offline morfiend

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10470
Re: B-17 Variants
« Reply #16 on: May 15, 2009, 03:57:00 PM »
Nice pix as usual Dan. :aok

 Dan,when did the horizontal stab get it's extention fillet?
 Looks like after "C"  but I thought it was after "D" can you clear that up for me?

  Thx.    :salute


 Meant verticle stab..... had a brain fart!

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: B-17 Variants
« Reply #17 on: May 15, 2009, 03:58:44 PM »

 Meant verticle stab..... had a brain fart!
Notice that it isn't just an extension fillet.  They enlarged the fuselage in order to put in the tail gun and tail gun access.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Re: B-17 Variants
« Reply #18 on: May 15, 2009, 05:21:40 PM »
The B17D was the last of the 'shark tails'.  The Swoose at the USAFM is the last surviving D model. E introduced the tail position, new vertical tail and tail guns.
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline TOMCAT21

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1648
Re: B-17 Variants
« Reply #19 on: May 15, 2009, 08:45:14 PM »
bring in other variants of the 17 and slight perk to the G.. say 3-10 range...
RETIRED US Army/ Flying and dying since Tour 80/"We're paratroopers, Lieutenant, we're supposed to be surrounded." - Capt. Richard Winters.  FSO 412th FNVG/MA- REGULATORS

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: B-17 Variants
« Reply #20 on: May 15, 2009, 09:33:36 PM »
bring in other variants of the 17 and slight perk to the G.. say 3-10 range...

Why perk it?


wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline TOMCAT21

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1648
Re: B-17 Variants
« Reply #21 on: May 15, 2009, 09:48:51 PM »
dunno...only got 1 perked bomber i guess.. they perked the t34/85 slightly...
RETIRED US Army/ Flying and dying since Tour 80/"We're paratroopers, Lieutenant, we're supposed to be surrounded." - Capt. Richard Winters.  FSO 412th FNVG/MA- REGULATORS

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Re: B-17 Variants
« Reply #22 on: May 16, 2009, 02:05:56 AM »
That would make little sense other then to put the G in the hanger as the F would be a bit faster, and the nose guns on the G just aren't that vital in the MA.  You'd still have lazer 50s in the nose of an E or F anyway.

Adding those variants would be purely for historical purposes in scenarios, snapshots or for skinning different birds. 
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline TOMCAT21

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1648
Re: B-17 Variants
« Reply #23 on: May 16, 2009, 10:01:06 AM »
i can understand what you are saying Guppy..I guess for me personally , as a whole, I dont understand why we have certain versions of some aircraft while we have multiple versions of others...if that makes any sense..I do apologize if I shifted away from the main topic.. :salute
RETIRED US Army/ Flying and dying since Tour 80/"We're paratroopers, Lieutenant, we're supposed to be surrounded." - Capt. Richard Winters.  FSO 412th FNVG/MA- REGULATORS

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Re: B-17 Variants
« Reply #24 on: May 16, 2009, 03:44:54 PM »
i can understand what you are saying Guppy..I guess for me personally , as a whole, I dont understand why we have certain versions of some aircraft while we have multiple versions of others...if that makes any sense..I do apologize if I shifted away from the main topic.. :salute

I'm all for more versions, just not perking the 17G.  HIstorically in the Pacific you'd have seen E's mixed with F's for a time in 42.  In the ETO and MTO you'd have seen mixed formations of F's and G's in late 43-early 44.  The skins possible would go up and the scenario historical accuracy would go up as well, which for us immersion fans is the only way to go. 
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Castle51

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 179
Re: B-17 Variants
« Reply #25 on: May 23, 2009, 11:57:56 PM »
Here is something I've been wondering about the B-17 in AH recently.  If you look up its specs (at least in wiki) it says its payload was 4000lbs long range and 8000lbs short range (Just about the same as the B-24).  Now pretty much anything in the MA could be considered short range so how does the B-24 get 8k while the B-17 only gets 6?

Offline oneway

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1385
Re: B-17 Variants
« Reply #26 on: May 26, 2009, 05:46:28 PM »
That would make little sense other then to put the G in the hanger as the F would be a bit faster, and the nose guns on the G just aren't that vital in the MA.  You'd still have lazer 50s in the nose of an E or F anyway.

Adding those variants would be purely for historical purposes in scenarios, snapshots or for skinning different birds. 

I completely disagree that the chin guns are not important or vital.

When I have some guy closing on my 6 at about 1200, I chop throttle completely...I can't count the number of times I have killed bad guys over shooting who think along the lines that the chin guns are basically irrelevant.

85% of the folks in MA have neither the patience or knowledge to properly take down bombers...nearly 100% of these guys will pull up slowly right in front of you on the over shoot exposing the entire top half of the aircraft to the nose guns...

I would enjoy trying the other variants for historical purpose, but I would choose the G every time in MA

1Way


Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Re: B-17 Variants
« Reply #27 on: May 26, 2009, 11:22:51 PM »
I completely disagree that the chin guns are not important or vital.

When I have some guy closing on my 6 at about 1200, I chop throttle completely...I can't count the number of times I have killed bad guys over shooting who think along the lines that the chin guns are basically irrelevant.

85% of the folks in MA have neither the patience or knowledge to properly take down bombers...nearly 100% of these guys will pull up slowly right in front of you on the over shoot exposing the entire top half of the aircraft to the nose guns...

I would enjoy trying the other variants for historical purpose, but I would choose the G every time in MA

1Way



Don't speak too soon.  A faster B17F with twin nose guns, as many had, might tempt you away from the G :)

Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Swatch

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 203
      • http://groups.yahoo.com/groups/rtcircus
Re: B-17 Variants
« Reply #28 on: May 27, 2009, 12:20:24 PM »
The F is a better looking bird.  I'd fly her ALL the time for her speed and looks.
OFFICIALLY AN AEROSPACE ENGINEER AS OF 1PM JUNE 13th!  Goodbye UC, you've been hell.

Proud member of the 364th CHawks, 383rd BG, formerly the RTC.

Offline Castle51

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 179
Re: B-17 Variants
« Reply #29 on: May 27, 2009, 10:49:47 PM »
Here is something I've been wondering about the B-17 in AH recently.  If you look up its specs (at least in wiki) it says its payload was 4000lbs long range and 8000lbs short range (Just about the same as the B-24).  Now pretty much anything in the MA could be considered short range so how does the B-24 get 8k while the B-17 only gets 6?

Uhh.... anybody?