Author Topic: Why not .....................................Ho  (Read 2424 times)

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
Re: Why not .....................................Ho
« Reply #45 on: May 18, 2009, 03:23:30 PM »
Only for the dull witted.  You are dismissed. I've no inclination to try to cure your stupidity. 

the door out of here is in front of you, I suggest you use it before you hurt yourself.  silly little childish banter will get you nowhere with me.
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline DamnedRen

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2164
Re: Why not .....................................Ho
« Reply #46 on: May 18, 2009, 03:26:42 PM »
Hmmmm...took a HO thinking I had avoided snailman but he stood so hard on his rudder spraying and preying that he got a 20 in and plaster me I couldn't roll and stand on the pedal fast enough to avoid his HO.  :rofl. I was actually surprised it would have been him. Go figure. :)

Ren

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
Re: Why not .....................................Ho
« Reply #47 on: May 18, 2009, 03:31:06 PM »
IIRC, Air Warrior on AOL actually disabled bullet damage from a certain range of front-angles. 
did AW have a collision model?
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline frosty

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 129
Re: Why not .....................................Ho
« Reply #48 on: May 18, 2009, 03:32:47 PM »
did AW have a collision model?

You mean in terms of airframe collisions?  Good question...that I don't recall.  I do remember flying H2H straight into newer players' gunfire and letting them waste their ammunition (on AOL...I think Kesmai online had HO shots enabled). 
« Last Edit: May 18, 2009, 03:38:06 PM by frosty »

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23930
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: Why not .....................................Ho
« Reply #49 on: May 18, 2009, 03:36:20 PM »
Hmmmm...took a HO thinking I had avoided snailman but he stood so hard on his rudder spraying and preying that he got a 20 in and plaster me I couldn't roll and stand on the pedal fast enough to avoid his HO.  :rofl. I was actually surprised it would have been him. Go figure. :)

Ren


Hmmm... You talking about last night?

If yes, that's how that HO looked like on my FE :





 :)
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline Steve

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6728
Re: Why not .....................................Ho
« Reply #50 on: May 18, 2009, 03:38:25 PM »

Hmmm... You talking about last night?

If yes, that's how that HO looked like on my FE :

[

Oh noes!  Taters!
Member: Hot Soup Mafia - Cream of Myshroom
Army of Muppets  Yes, my ingame name is Steve

Offline frosty

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 129
Re: Why not .....................................Ho
« Reply #51 on: May 18, 2009, 03:39:31 PM »

Hmmm... You talking about last night?

If yes, that's how that HO looked like on my FE :

(Image removed from quote.)

(Image removed from quote.)

 :)

That first pic.... :rofl

Were you jumped by an airshow team?

Offline Shuffler

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27301
Re: Why not .....................................Ho
« Reply #52 on: May 18, 2009, 03:40:20 PM »
Enough of this silly obtuse stuff.  Just define it.

Why don't you get off your lazy duff and reread the definition. People can't be holding your hand all the time. The only thing silly in this thread is your ignorance of what has been posted many times on these threads. If your actually that ignorant..... well I feel sorry for you. If your just playing ignorant... well your really good at it.
80th FS "Headhunters"

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23930
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: Why not .....................................Ho
« Reply #53 on: May 18, 2009, 03:41:01 PM »
That first pic.... :rofl

Were you jumped by an airshow team?

Neg, the two spits and 190 were on poor Spartin2 in his low & slow P-47. I tried to save him, but to no avail. I did a good job at shooting empty air most of the time that night ;)
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline frosty

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 129
Re: Why not .....................................Ho
« Reply #54 on: May 18, 2009, 03:43:42 PM »
Why don't you get off your lazy duff and reread the definition. People can't be holding your hand all the time. The only thing silly in this thread is your ignorance of what has been posted many times on these threads. If your actually that ignorant..... well I feel sorry for you. If your just playing ignorant... well your really good at it.

Uh huh.  Go follow Steve.

Offline Shuffler

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27301
Re: Why not .....................................Ho
« Reply #55 on: May 18, 2009, 03:44:52 PM »
I prefer to watch you kids make a fool of yourselves in front of others
80th FS "Headhunters"

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

Offline frosty

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 129
Re: Why not .....................................Ho
« Reply #56 on: May 18, 2009, 03:54:00 PM »
I prefer to watch you kids make a fool of yourselves in front of others

Who started the name calling and hostilities?  Lordy, some of you guys get so off-base.  It's not healthy.  Relax.  It's a game.  You certainly should holster your invocation of the "kids" label after such a tirade.

I ask a guy a simple question: tell me what he thinks an HO is, plain and simple.  Instead he resorts to child-like posing and arrogance, rather than answering said simple question.  It's ok though, as someone already answered for him.

Offline Crash Orange

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 911
Re: Why not .....................................Ho
« Reply #57 on: May 18, 2009, 04:01:57 PM »
Enough of this silly obtuse stuff.  Just define it.

The fact that the other guy swerves before the moment of impact doesn't change the fact that you were playing chicken.

HOing is playing chicken in cartoon airplanes, with the addition of automatic weapons. More or less. HTH.

  :salute

Offline frosty

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 129
Re: Why not .....................................Ho
« Reply #58 on: May 18, 2009, 04:22:43 PM »
The fact that the other guy swerves before the moment of impact doesn't change the fact that you were playing chicken.

HOing is playing chicken in cartoon airplanes, with the addition of automatic weapons. More or less. HTH.

  :salute

Right, so here's my question.

Everyone can agree that it takes two to play chicken, correct?  That was the point that I was trying to get Steve to acknowledge.  My thinking was that one could avoid that HO shot by simply refusing to play chicken in the first place. 

Or is ANY frontal-angle shot on the initial pass considered cheap?  Honest question.  I feel like there is a lot of disagreement there.  I'd like to avoid being a cheapshot (unless it's warranted  :)). 
« Last Edit: May 18, 2009, 04:26:03 PM by frosty »

Offline Crash Orange

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 911
Re: Why not .....................................Ho
« Reply #59 on: May 18, 2009, 04:44:47 PM »
Right, so here's my question.

Everyone can agree that it takes two to play chicken, correct? 

I would say no, because whether you're playing chicken depends on your intent. To extend the car analogy, I'm thinking of the scene in "A Clockwork Orange" (hope you've seen it) where Alex & his droogs are playing "Hogs of the Road" - they were playing chicken, the other cars weren't, because the other drivers' intent was for the cars to pass each other in adjacent lanes.

Or is ANY frontal-angle shot on the initial pass considered cheap? 

I can't speak for Steve or say there are *no* exceptions, but generally, I'd say yes. (But of course not everyone agrees as to how lame or not it is to take a cheap shot.)