Author Topic: heinkel he 177  (Read 1398 times)

Offline slimmer

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 272
heinkel he 177
« on: June 02, 2009, 07:57:26 AM »
how about heinkel he 177
Crew: 5
Length: 22 m (72 ft 2 in)
Wingspan: 31.44 m (103 ft 1 in)
Height: 6.7 m (21 ft)
Wing area: 101.5 m² (1,092 ft²)
Empty weight: 16,800 kg (37,000 lb)
Loaded weight: 31,000 kg (68,340 lb)
Powerplant: 2× Daimler-Benz DB 610 (twin DB 605) 24-cylinder liquid-cooled inline engines, 2,950 hp (2,170 kW) each
Performance

Maximum speed: 565 km/h (350 mph) at 6,100 m (21,000 ft)
Combat radius: 1,540 km (960 mi)
Ferry range: 5,600 km (3,200 mi)
Service ceiling: 9,400 m (30,800 ft)
Wing loading: 319.9 kg/m² (65.6 lb/ft²)
Power/mass: 110 W/kg (0.067 hp/lb)
Armament


Guns:

2 × 20 mm MG 151 cannons  :O
3 × 13 mm (.51 in) MG 131 machine guns
3 × 7.92 mm (.312 in) MG 81 machine guns
Bombs: up to 7,200 kg (15,873 lb) of bombs or 3 × guided missiles (Henschel Hs 293 or Fritz X)
Usual configuration:

48 × 70 kg bombs (3,360 kg/7,405 lb total)
10 × 500 kg bombs (5,000 kg/11,020 lb total)
6 × 1,000 kg bombs (6,000 kg/11,224 lb total)
2 × 2,500 kg bombs (5,000 kg/ 11,020 lb total)
Member: Hot Soup Mafia -chokin chickin noodle
 Army of Muppets

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10165
Re: heinkel he 177
« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2009, 08:08:43 AM »
+1

CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!

Offline BnZs

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4207
Re: heinkel he 177
« Reply #2 on: June 02, 2009, 08:14:52 AM »
Huh...the two ~5000 lbs bombs would ensure a lot of use right there.

That said, hopefully if we got this we'd get the He-111 at the same time so BoB scenarios would have a bomber that can be caught. :)
"Crikey, sir. I'm looking forward to today. Up diddly up, down diddly down, whoops, poop, twiddly dee - decent scrap with the fiendish Red Baron - bit of a jolly old crash landing behind enemy lines - capture, torture, escape, and then back home in time for tea and medals."

Offline 1Boner

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
Re: heinkel he 177
« Reply #3 on: June 02, 2009, 08:21:09 AM »
Sorry, its too fast and too good looking!!  ;)

(just how I like my women)
"Life is just as deadly as it looks"  Richard Thompson

"So umm.... just to make sure I have this right.  What you are asking is for the bombers carrying bombs, to stop dropping bombs on the bombs, so the bombers can carry bombs to bomb things with?"  AKP

Offline Baumer

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
      • 332nd Flying Mongrels
Re: heinkel he 177
« Reply #4 on: June 02, 2009, 10:23:28 AM »
It definitely needs to be added, however I think there are a few planes (such as BnZ pointed out) that should have a higher priority on the list.

HTC Please show the blue planes some love!
F4F-4, FM2, SBD-5, TBM-3

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: heinkel he 177
« Reply #5 on: June 02, 2009, 12:01:32 PM »
I'd prefer the He-111 before we get the He-177.
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline Silent6

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 316
Re: heinkel he 177
« Reply #6 on: June 02, 2009, 01:06:04 PM »
Id love to see this one make it into the game it so fast they may have to perk it though..

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: heinkel he 177
« Reply #7 on: June 02, 2009, 02:23:15 PM »
To be honest I'd rather the He 111, Ju 188 and Do 217 before the He 177. Maybe even the Do 17.
Partly because it's so smurfy.
« Last Edit: June 02, 2009, 02:25:19 PM by Motherland »

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: heinkel he 177
« Reply #8 on: June 02, 2009, 07:41:42 PM »
Huh...the two ~5000 lbs bombs would ensure a lot of use right there.

That said, hopefully if we got this we'd get the He-111 at the same time so BoB scenarios would have a bomber that can be caught. :)

Not in AH..4K limit imposed by HTC.
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: heinkel he 177
« Reply #9 on: June 02, 2009, 11:22:28 PM »
I'd rather see the Ju188A-2 added.  The Ju188 is such a pretty bomber and capable too.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
Re: heinkel he 177
« Reply #10 on: June 03, 2009, 05:57:24 AM »
Without engine fires or other failures, the He-177 would be pretty capable too!

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: heinkel he 177
« Reply #11 on: June 03, 2009, 06:12:38 AM »
Mossie meat, therefore +1

 :aok
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
Re: heinkel he 177
« Reply #12 on: June 03, 2009, 06:15:10 AM »
Mossie meat, therefore +1

 :aok

Think again!

2 × 20 mm MG 151 cannons 
3 × 13 mm (.51 in) MG 131 machine guns
3 × 7.92 mm (.312 in) MG 81 machine guns

!

Offline 1Boner

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
Re: heinkel he 177
« Reply #13 on: June 03, 2009, 06:44:41 AM »
It definitely needs to be added, however I think there are a few planes (such as BnZ pointed out) that should have a higher priority on the list.




I,m really sick of reading this quote everytime someone suggests a plane.
"Life is just as deadly as it looks"  Richard Thompson

"So umm.... just to make sure I have this right.  What you are asking is for the bombers carrying bombs, to stop dropping bombs on the bombs, so the bombers can carry bombs to bomb things with?"  AKP

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: heinkel he 177
« Reply #14 on: June 03, 2009, 06:57:16 AM »
Think again!

2 × 20 mm MG 151 cannons 
3 × 13 mm (.51 in) MG 131 machine guns
3 × 7.92 mm (.312 in) MG 81 machine guns

!

I'm aware of defensive armament, however unless you're aware of claims which have escaped my attention, the historical equation is heavily in the Mossie's favour.

Not saying it wouldn't be different in the unfriendly skies of AH though.
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB