Author Topic: Fuel Capacity -1C versus -1D  (Read 618 times)

Offline Vermillion

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4012
Fuel Capacity -1C versus -1D
« on: February 09, 2000, 07:44:00 AM »
Was reading my AHT last night on the F4U-4 Corsair and came across some interesting information.

On page 508, it lists the different Corsair models, and their internal and external fuel capacities. (table snipped for brevity)

F4U-1      361 Internal     175 External
F4U-1C     361 Internal     175 External
F4U-1D     237 Internal     300 External
F4U-4      234 Internal     300 External

This would seem to indicate that the -1C still had the wing tanks that were removed from the -1D. And the -1C still had the single centerline attachement point, in contrast to the pair of wingmounted attachment points of the -1D.

The information does confuse me since, the -1C was reportedly a -1D model equipped with a different armament.

Currently, in AH, the two variants have the same fuel systems, and twin external attachement points.

It could be a typo, but does anyone else have anymore information?

Normally I wouldnt' care but since fuel is such a big deal in AH, and Pyro had asked the other day in another thread for anymore information on the -1C external stores arrangment, I thought I would post this.

------------------
Vermillion
**MOL**, Men of Leisure,
Dicta Verm: "Never give the suckers an even break!" or translated "Never engage without an advantage"

Offline Lephturn

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1200
      • http://lephturn.webhop.net
Fuel Capacity -1C versus -1D
« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2000, 07:53:00 AM »
VERY interesting stuff Verm.

Just a BIT more internal fuel and I'd never use a DT on the Hawg.  A 1C with more gas... drool.  Bring it on.

Unfortunately, I would have liked to see the increased internal fuel on the D model.  That would have given me reason to fly the .50 cal version. :/  Oh well.

------------------
Lephturn
The Flying Pigs

Offline Rocket

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 403
Fuel Capacity -1C versus -1D
« Reply #2 on: February 09, 2000, 07:58:00 AM »
In surfing the net for info on Big Blue I found that it varies from source to source.  Some say a 1C is a modified 1A there for wing tanks and single DT and others say 1D platform.  Production dates point towards it being built on a 1D platform but you never know 200 1A could have been modified that were sitting around waiting to be shipped.  I would be really interested to find out which it was and will continue to search for hard data.  
Thought to chew on.  Where are the wing tanks in the -1A?  What is the wieght difference between the 4 20mm and the 6 .50s with ammo?  What is the actual mounting location of the cannon versus outer wing for the .50s?  Answer these and it may shed a clue  

Rocket

------------------
The Red Dragons
Fierce and Bold
With Honour and Courage
_______________________
www.reddragons.de

Offline ra

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3569
Fuel Capacity -1C versus -1D
« Reply #3 on: February 11, 2000, 04:11:00 PM »
Pyro was already aware of the AHT info when he asked for other sources.

One thing that is missing in the -1D for sure is the auxiliary fuel tank.  The main tank held 237 gallons, 50 of which were in a separate internal auxiliary tank which had to be selected by the pilot.  See AHT page 546 lower left corner for a drawing of the -1D fuel selector.  Without the ability to select this 50-gal tank separately we will have no reserve if our main tank springs a leak.

Incidentally, the leading edge fuel tanks on the -1A were not self sealing, so properly modeled they may make the Hog a bit more prone to burning when hit.

--ra--

Offline pzvg

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Fuel Capacity -1C versus -1D
« Reply #4 on: February 11, 2000, 11:21:00 PM »
Every source I've hit so far, Smithsonian,Paxriver,Pima all give me little in the way of figures, but as far as I can tell, no difference in fuel cap at all.
Chance-Vought says that too, and hell if ya can't trust the manufacturer  

------------------
pzvg- "5 years and I still can't shoot"

Offline Vermillion

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4012
Fuel Capacity -1C versus -1D
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2000, 07:46:00 AM »
I guess the real issue is whether the -1C is a derivative of the -1D or the -1A. I have seen both statements and data that supports either position.

The differences in the FM would overall be small, but it is interesting for me in a historical way.

------------------
Vermillion
**MOL**, Men of Leisure,
Dicta Verm: "Never give the suckers an even break!" or translated "Never engage without an advantage"

Offline pzvg

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Fuel Capacity -1C versus -1D
« Reply #6 on: February 14, 2000, 08:14:00 AM »
-1A, the C predates the D by almost 8 months
according to Chance-Vought's historical timeline

------------------
pzvg- "5 years and I still can't shoot"

Offline indian

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 237
Fuel Capacity -1C versus -1D
« Reply #7 on: February 14, 2000, 09:05:00 AM »
I have also seen that the -1c is a -1a with cannons but laso that it was early -1d I dont think it had rocket mounts on the wings. The pics in AHT show no mounts but could be a wrong pics for the -1c. I believe the extra two 50 cals in the wing is what changes the fuel load they take up more room for guns and the ammo.

------------------
Tommy (INDIAN) Toon
  Cherokee Indian
My Homepage
Where you can find the Key Commands in  files for Word6 Wordpad and text mode.

indians Homepage

Aces High Word6 and Wordpad Doc's available on my web site.