Author Topic: FSO: Operation Husky - Frame 2 Results  (Read 3774 times)

Offline ghostdancer

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7562
Re: FSO: Operation Husky - Frame 2 Results
« Reply #45 on: June 13, 2009, 12:42:55 PM »
Well I have narrowed things down to two choices.

1) Let the GV and A56 attack scores stand. Resulting in the Axis winning the frame by 194 pts.

or

2) I don't count the GV battle and the A56 attack (both the bombing and the 11 kills that Axis had up there and 8 losses). Which results in the Axis winning by 115 pts.

Got to run but more later.

Oh, and DMbear the point is that neither side could no which was the correct target without asking me for clarification. The map was the actual correct target so by your logic you are wrong. By my logic neither side was wrong because I made a mistake in the objectives. So the point really is moot and possible outcome or what would have been correct or incorrect tactics, etc. is just conjecture.
X.O. 29th TFT, "We Move Mountains"
CM Terrain Team

Offline DH367th

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 771
Re: FSO: Operation Husky - Frame 2 Results
« Reply #46 on: June 13, 2009, 12:50:23 PM »
Stampf none takin sir didnt mean any smack towards you was just saying how I would have loked at sir im sure you did as orders said and as you saw fit I was not in your seat if I was might very well did the same thing :salute
You don't have to be crazy but it helps

Offline Flifast

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 311
      • Claim Jumpers
Re: FSO: Operation Husky - Frame 2 Results
« Reply #47 on: June 13, 2009, 12:57:49 PM »
What ever GhostDancer decides, our team had fun anywhere we go.  This is going to make frame 3 alot more high stakes!  Fli

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: FSO: Operation Husky - Frame 2 Results
« Reply #48 on: June 13, 2009, 12:58:37 PM »
:huh

Glad you usually allied.

24 P47's vrs. 14 BF109F's ?

No sir.  We needed some kind of equalization, and that was letting them blow their 25 k of alt before engaging, but you lead yours and I'll lead mine.  :aok

Frankly, I'd have wet myself for joy if I was capping a field and had only 2 to 1 odds to deal with, all of them Jabos.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline bignasdy

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 26
      • American Veteran Pool Table Service
Re: FSO: Operation Husky - Frame 2 Results
« Reply #49 on: June 13, 2009, 01:04:48 PM »
On a happier note, where are the stats? Like who shot down who? LOL
I searched but cand find em for some reason... :salute
thanx
d

Offline Stampf

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11491
Re: FSO: Operation Husky - Frame 2 Results
« Reply #50 on: June 13, 2009, 01:10:02 PM »
Stampf none takin sir didnt mean any smack towards you was just saying how I would have loked at sir im sure you did as orders said and as you saw fit I was not in your seat if I was might very well did the same thing :salute

 :salute

Cya next week.
- Der Wander Zirkus -
- La Fabrica de Exitos -

Offline Fencer51

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4679
Re: FSO: Operation Husky - Frame 2 Results
« Reply #51 on: June 13, 2009, 01:39:12 PM »

First spawn of the night was an Axis M8 by captdan at 22:03:09. First damage done to a ship of C110 was at 23:04:09. So they hit it at T+59 according to damage logs.


Would that not be T+61 ?
Fencer
The names of the irrelevant have been changed to protect their irrelevance.
The names of the innocent and the guilty have not been changed.
As for the innocent, everyone needs to know they are innocent –
As for the guilty… they can suck it.

Offline Delirium

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7276
Re: FSO: Operation Husky - Frame 2 Results
« Reply #52 on: June 13, 2009, 02:13:29 PM »
All this bickering about a score, that means nothing, is sad.
Delirium
80th "Headhunters"
Retired AH Trainer (but still teach the P38 selectively)

I found an air leak in my inflatable sheep and plugged the hole! Honest!

Offline DmdJJ

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 183
Re: FSO: Operation Husky - Frame 2 Results
« Reply #53 on: June 13, 2009, 03:31:58 PM »
In regards to C110 it was attacked before the T+60.

First spawn of the night was an Axis M8 by captdan at 22:03:09. First damage done to a ship of C110 was at 23:04:09. So they hit it at T+59 according to damage logs.
My math may be off, but wouldn't that make it 61 minutes? :huh
DmdJJ   
"The Damned"
"Damned if we do, no fun if we don't"
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
Target Rebaul-----> VMF-214   Fjord Fury RAF----> 315 Squadron

Offline bignasdy

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 26
      • American Veteran Pool Table Service
Re: FSO: Operation Husky - Frame 2 Results
« Reply #54 on: June 13, 2009, 03:39:40 PM »
oh well this brrad is just like the game...
I dont need to know the chitt anyway...screw it....thanx for nothin! :furious

Offline AKDogg

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2307
      • http://aksquad.net/
Re: FSO: Operation Husky - Frame 2 Results
« Reply #55 on: June 13, 2009, 04:33:49 PM »
oh well this brrad is just like the game...
I dont need to know the chitt anyway...screw it....thanx for nothin! :furious

http://ahevents.org/eventlogs.html
AKDogg
Arabian knights
#Dogg in AW
http://aksquad.net/

Offline CHAPPY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 855
Re: FSO: Operation Husky - Frame 2 Results
« Reply #56 on: June 13, 2009, 06:08:30 PM »


1) Let the GV and A56 attack scores stand. Resulting in the Axis winning the frame by 194 pts.



Sounds good to me. :aok

<S> Stampf Good work JG2 would have done the same sir :salute


 :salute Allied CIC great frame

 :salute AXIS  :x


Offline UncleKurt

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 927
Re: FSO: Operation Husky - Frame 2 Results
« Reply #57 on: June 13, 2009, 06:17:53 PM »
According to our orders (that I have) CLAIM JUMPERS were assigned A56, and destroyed A56. End of story in my book! Thank You!
I Like pizza!
I Hate red airplanes!
Leave my sheep alone!
What an axle!<br/Do Not Impose to Bully Around Me!

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: FSO: Operation Husky - Frame 2 Results
« Reply #58 on: June 13, 2009, 06:41:36 PM »
Sounds good to me. :aok


CHAPPY,

The difference is the GV battle was virtually unfightable for the allies. It was like they were spawning in the hangar with 20 Tigers behind them. The Allied LVTs had no choice in the matter.

In contrast Stampf's crew had every opportunity to engage the CJ's before they dropped on 56, Stampf (per his own admission) just elected not to.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline CHAPPY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 855
Re: FSO: Operation Husky - Frame 2 Results
« Reply #59 on: June 13, 2009, 08:29:33 PM »
ok no gv score and no score on 56 due to CM mix up.
CHAPPY,

The difference is the GV battle was virtually unfightable for the allies. It was like they were spawning in the hangar with 20 Tigers behind them. The Allied LVTs had no choice in the matter.

In contrast Stampf's crew had every opportunity to engage the CJ's before they dropped on 56, Stampf (per his own admission) just elected not to.

In contrast all we did as AXIS is follow orders SAXMAN. If you have a problem with that then i guess you need to talk to the CM's. :salute
« Last Edit: June 13, 2009, 08:42:26 PM by CHAPPY »