I was taught not to make a rule that u can't or won't enforce properly. What I see happening here is to many rules that are beginning to have no meaning or that can be interpreted differently from 1 CM to another. I personally think that there should be consistancy between all CM's on how they interpret the rules. This is where the CM trainers come into play. We need consistancy.
Same with scoring. What is wrong with having a baseline or the same scoring system for each FSO? Having 4+ different scoring systems to me is assinine and difficult sometimes for the players/squads to follow.
I agree here on all points. Unfortunately it's never been able to be hashed out.
I came to the conclusion that the FSO team is like a board of directors or city council. Everyone has different ideas on how to improve the company or city. They bring ideas up for discussion, some ideas are approved, some are shot down. Some never agree, some always agree, some agree to disagree.
In the end, I think allowing the CMs to do what they want to do inside of a set of specific rules is the only way you can effectively have one team of people making the best events Aces High will ever see. A standard scoring system could possibly be agreed upon, it just needs to be reached by agreement by the FSO team.
Will that happen? I doubt it. Too many factors at play. The main reason is without the liberty to adjust the scoring I don't think it would be fair for certain events to be scored the same way.
I would like to see it happen though
