Author Topic: Why would the Brits....?  (Read 3948 times)

Offline Bosco123

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3604
Why would the Brits....?
« on: June 17, 2009, 12:22:13 PM »
Why would the Brits make a circle for steering? what's the gain of using that, as opposed to using a regular flight stick? what's the disadvantage?
Skifurd AKA "Bosco"
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Operator
United States Marine
"Stay ahead of the game, Stay ahead of the plane."

Offline PFactorDave

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4334
Re: Why would the Brits....?
« Reply #1 on: June 17, 2009, 12:23:18 PM »
Why would the Brits make a circle for steering? what's the gain of using that, as opposed to using a regular flight stick? what's the disadvantage?

Easier to get both hands on it when pulling out of those really fast dives.

1st Lieutenant
FSO Liaison Officer
Rolling Thunder

Offline fudgums

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4049
Re: Why would the Brits....?
« Reply #2 on: June 17, 2009, 01:19:06 PM »
Easier to get both hands on it when pulling out of those really fast dives.

Yet, a regular flight stick will feel more natural
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27

Offline BigPlay

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
Re: Why would the Brits....?
« Reply #3 on: June 17, 2009, 03:10:07 PM »
Why would the Brits make a circle for steering? what's the gain of using that, as opposed to using a regular flight stick? what's the disadvantage?

Why did they put a steering wheel on the P-38, that was typically used on bombers not fighters.

Offline Greebo

  • Skinner Team
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7075
Re: Why would the Brits....?
« Reply #4 on: June 17, 2009, 03:23:45 PM »
This reminds me of something I read about the Mosquito. The first Mossies were unarmed reconnaisance aircraft or bombers which had a rotating control yoke for roll control like all British bombers. De Havilland kept this yoke for the cannon armed fighter bomber version prototype but were told to change it to a control stick by RAF Fighter Command. It was pointed out that the pilot could use his muscles more effectively with a yoke than a stick and that using a stick would therefore reduce the roll rate of the aircraft. Not only that but the change in design would delay the introduction of the new type and cost more. Still, the RAF insisted it was changed. In their minds bombers had yokes and fighters had sticks and that was that.

In a small aircraft like a Spitfire I can see where a yoke might obscure a lot of the instrument panel's gauges and switches, but in a large cockpit like the Mosquito had this was less of an issue.
« Last Edit: June 17, 2009, 03:25:24 PM by Greebo »

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Re: Why would the Brits....?
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2009, 03:55:42 PM »
Why did they put a steering wheel on the P-38, that was typically used on bombers not fighters.

The P38 is a bomber

Offline BigPlay

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
Re: Why would the Brits....?
« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2009, 04:04:30 PM »
The P38 is a bomber

I know it carries and drops bombs but the "P" designation says it's a fighter. I have a felling your just being fascias.

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: Why would the Brits....?
« Reply #7 on: June 17, 2009, 04:51:02 PM »
better question: why did the RAF move over to regular sticks?

nothing ergonomic about the vertical stick, i mean when you're cruising in a car with one hand on the wheel, does you hand go naturally to the 1-2 oclock position, or to dead 3 oclock with your grip vertical?


afaik the usual pilot position for a kill in a spitty would have been hunched down into the sight, knees under your chin with your feet on the upper set of rudder pedals (reduces G-effects) with both hands on the stick, elbows braced hard against the side of the cockpit. bit different from lounging at a desk :)
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Why would the Brits....?
« Reply #8 on: June 17, 2009, 06:07:22 PM »
The P38 is a bomber

 :furious Friggin' Lutefisk eating Norwegians!


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: Why would the Brits....?
« Reply #9 on: June 17, 2009, 06:29:44 PM »
I presume you refer to the steering of...a Spitfire?
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: Why would the Brits....?
« Reply #10 on: June 17, 2009, 06:36:59 PM »
Dunno 'bout this one. Have an interview in which John Cunningham said he preferred the yoke to the stick.

Not sure why (if?) Fighter Command would insist on a stick, already had plenty of Beaus with "spectacles", so far as I know, unless one of the Beaufighter nerds has more info.
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline Vuokko

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: Why would the Brits....?
« Reply #11 on: June 17, 2009, 07:44:48 PM »
:furious Friggin' Lutefisk eating Norwegians!

ack-ack
And he is still right.
Lentotaitoahan minulla ei koskaan ole ollut - vaan eipä sitä taida AH'n kaltasissa airquakeissa paljoa tarvitakaan. On toi reaktionopeus ollu aina aika heikko.

Offline Bosco123

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3604
Re: Why would the Brits....?
« Reply #12 on: June 17, 2009, 07:48:30 PM »
I presume you refer to the steering of...a Spitfire?
Almost all RAF fighters. I had this thought today when I was looking at my cockpit kit for my new Seafury that we are building and they have the same concept. I was curious.
Skifurd AKA "Bosco"
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Operator
United States Marine
"Stay ahead of the game, Stay ahead of the plane."

Offline Tilt

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
      • FullTilt
Re: Why would the Brits....?
« Reply #13 on: June 18, 2009, 06:53:01 AM »
All Lavochkin aircraft upto the La 5FN also had a circular (oval) grip. (AH has an La7 stick in its La5FN)

It enabled the pilot to over come extreme stick forces using two hands.............. in the case of lavochkins the stick forces were reduced when subtle changes were made to the control surface actuaters and this enabled the single handle stick to be implemented in the La7.
Ludere Vincere

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
Re: Why would the Brits....?
« Reply #14 on: June 18, 2009, 09:56:39 AM »
Real life pilots must've been glad they didn't have the twisty stick!