Author Topic: Aerodynamics question - aileron rolls  (Read 2449 times)

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Aerodynamics question - aileron rolls
« Reply #30 on: July 19, 2009, 04:52:17 PM »
That makes perfect sense.  Dunno how I didn't figure it out.. I really like the second diagram. Thanks DTango :) 
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12425
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Re: Aerodynamics question - aileron rolls
« Reply #31 on: July 21, 2009, 10:07:36 AM »
But wait, we have not yet spoken of adverse yaw effects during steady state and roll onset. And the changes in roll rate based on 1g vs unloaded roll. And the effects of dihedral when rudder is pushed to create a rolling moment.

Btw first time I was attempting to do steady inverted flight in the RV, I was entering it from the top of a loop. Inverted stall speed in the RV turns out to be about 95 Knots,(unknown to me at this time) I made a very nice avalanche with out trying.

HiTech


Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: Aerodynamics question - aileron rolls
« Reply #32 on: July 21, 2009, 10:47:58 AM »
Inverted stall speed in the RV turns out to be about 95 Knots,(unknown to me at this time) I made a very nice avalanche with out trying.

That wicked 23000 airfoil on the RVs is completely unsuited to aerobatics.  As smart as Van is, I never could understand his airfoil choice for those planes.  I bet they'd all be at least 15% faster with a nicely tuned laminar airfoil...
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech

Offline CAP1

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22287
      • The Axis Vs Allies Arena
Re: Aerodynamics question - aileron rolls
« Reply #33 on: July 21, 2009, 11:42:34 AM »
That wicked 23000 airfoil on the RVs is completely unsuited to aerobatics.  As smart as Van is, I never could understand his airfoil choice for those planes.  I bet they'd all be at least 15% faster with a nicely tuned laminar airfoil...

this i never knew....i thought the rv series were supposed to be capable of mild aerobatics?
ingame 1LTCAP
80th FS "Headhunters"
S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning in a Bottle)

Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: Aerodynamics question - aileron rolls
« Reply #34 on: July 21, 2009, 11:52:01 AM »
this i never knew....i thought the rv series were supposed to be capable of mild aerobatics?

They are extremely capable--I was commenting on the wing airfoil itself and not the aircraft.  The 23000 airfoil possesses some really nasty characteristics that, I would have thought, would have disqualified it for use on the RV series of aircraft, but that's the one Van chose.  HTs comment about an inverted stall speed some 40 knots faster than Vs would be one of those characteristics I was speaking of.
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Aerodynamics question - aileron rolls
« Reply #35 on: July 21, 2009, 06:52:55 PM »
But wait, we have not yet spoken of adverse yaw effects during steady state and roll onset. And the changes in roll rate based on 1g vs unloaded roll. And the effects of dihedral when rudder is pushed to create a rolling moment.
I'm all ears if you don't mind describing what the gist of each is. :)
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you