Author Topic: 190a5 Flight model and Graphics problems  (Read 1182 times)

Offline Buzzbait

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1141
190a5 Flight model and Graphics problems
« on: January 18, 2001, 04:52:00 PM »
S! all

I`ve been flying the 190a5 recently for a change.  It`s actually not a bad plane if you fly without the two MGFF Cannon.  Got a decent climb, accelerates quickly, especially in a dive, handles well at medium to high speeds, zooms well and has good initial turn at high speed.  (although perhaps not as good as it should be)  Just don`t hang around and burn `E` after you make your first pass.

Several inaccuracies I noticed:  

1)  The aircraft can be run on boost for ever without overheating.  This is actually not the case historically.  The A8 had the Methanol/Water injection system added to prevent the  overheating which characterized the A4/A5 etc when using the direct injection  of fuel into the supercharger which was the A5`s system of reducing overheating when on high boost.

2)  The A5 should be as fast or faster than the A8 at sea level when using boost.  I can send documents regarding this if someone is interested.  (355mph is correct speed)

3)  Even when you don`t load the MGFF outer cannon, they still show as visible on the wings.  Hoping this doesn`t mean the aircraft is still paying the weight penalty for the empty guns and only saving on ammo load.  In any case, this is a graphics glitch.

4)  As the Luftwaffe guys have said many times, the MG34`s in the cowling could be removed.  All of the 190a4`s and a5`s used in the Jabo raids against London and SW England in the summers of 1942 and 1943 had these guns removed as well as the MGFF Cannon.  Another thing about the MG34`s:  Many guys say they never fire the MG34`s because they are useless.  Well definitely they were not very effective, historically the Luftwaffe pilots used them as and aiming guide, to sight in the cannon.  When they started to get hits with the MG`s, then they opened up with the cannon. However when I try to use them this way, I instead find they are a handicap to seeing hits on the target.  This is because the muzzle flashes from the MG`s are so bright they obscure your view of the target completely.  I think this is historically inaccurate.  The  guns would not generate that big a flash, and certainly, if flash was a problem, then they wouldn`t have been used by the German pilots as gunnery aids.  So muzzle flash needs to be brought down significantly.

5)  The Rate of Fire of the MG151/20`s in the wing roots seems very low.  I realize they were syncronized guns which were firing within the propellor`s arc, which slightly cut down on the ROF, but they seem to be really slow.  Hearing them is like:  Boom, Boom, Boom... not a continuous sound.  Perhaps a re-examination of the ROF needs to be done here.


                    Cheers Buzzbait

Offline LLv34_Snefens

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 728
      • Lentolaivue 34
190a5 Flight model and Graphics problems
« Reply #1 on: January 18, 2001, 06:29:00 PM »
1) Neither of the 190's in AH are equipped with MW50. Only the 109G-10 has this installed. The A5 can run on "WEP" for 10 min in AH before it is shut down.

5)Don't listen to the sound for how many rounds are being fired. This sound is a default 20mm sound I think. By looking at the counter I get they have a ROF of about 625/min.
Snefens, Lentolaivue 34.
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

"Luck beats skill anytime"

Offline Hooligan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 889
190a5 Flight model and Graphics problems
« Reply #2 on: January 18, 2001, 06:49:00 PM »
2) Are these documents posted on the WEB anywhere?  If not send them to me and I will post them if I have sufficient space.

5)  A few versions ago I measured the ROF of these guns with a stopwatch and got 630 rounds per minute.

Hooligan

Offline Fishu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3789
190a5 Flight model and Graphics problems
« Reply #3 on: January 18, 2001, 08:16:00 PM »
Umm, check that machinegun model again..
its not MG34 in the planes

Offline Buzzbait

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1141
190a5 Flight model and Graphics problems
« Reply #4 on: January 18, 2001, 08:24:00 PM »
S! Snefens

Hmmm.... No MW-50 with 190a8?  Doesn`t sound like the historical A8.  That aircraft had it as standard issue as well as GM-1 Nitrous.  What`s the justification for it not being included?

Offline Buzzbait

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1141
190a5 Flight model and Graphics problems
« Reply #5 on: January 18, 2001, 08:28:00 PM »
S! Fishu

If it`s not MG34, then its a 7.92mm MG anyway, which is the same for the purposes of producing a muzzle flash.  The issue is the brightness and size of the muzzle flash and the effect of it on spotting rounds hitting the target.  The German pilots were very able to use the small calibre weapon to align their aim and then squeeze off a burst from their big guns.  In AH the flashes completely obscure the target.

Offline RAM

  • Parolee
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
190a5 Flight model and Graphics problems
« Reply #6 on: January 18, 2001, 10:13:00 PM »
 Sad as it is I've found no single trustable documentation on Fw190As being fitted with MW50. They were fitted with GM1, and the boost override for very low altitudes.

AFAIK, a lot of G and F 190s were fitted with the MW50. The A-series didnt, tho, although they had provision for it.


Here is a couple of scans I posted a while ago, explaining the boost systems used by the Luftwaffe. The A8 uses the petrol injection into the air intake. The A5 doenst. That is the reason that A8 is 15mph faster on the deck, but at 3K the speed lines of the A5 and A8 crosses not to ever cross again. The boost override works only at very low altitudes.


         

       

2-As I said already, no, the A5 is slower at low altitudes. Rightly so.

3-that is art only, the Fw190A8 with 2x20mm shows 4 cannons too. BElieve me, the weight of the outboard cannons is not there when you load the 2x20mm configuration. THe difference is well noticeable.

4-MGs on the cowling are MG15, not MG34. I doubt about the "firing MGs before cannons" unless they were at very low ranges, they have very different ballistics.

I also find them useless, and I'd love to see the option to get rid of them at all. BTW the A5s used in UK for fast slashing bombings were Fw190A5/U3. Those had wing racks for wing bomgs, or DTs. those had also central rack for multiple bombs.

Leter, those planes' designation was  changed, and they were known as Fw190G3. (HINT HINT ; WHY NOT MAKE THE 190A5 BE CONFIGURED AS A G3?)


5-ROF of mausers suck. I dont know if rightly or not. But I find highly questionable that with a ROF of 650 rpm ,the bandits are able to cross my bullet streams without getting hit. This happens a lot to me (and to more 190 drivers).




[This message has been edited by RAM (edited 01-19-2001).]

Offline Buzzbait

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1141
190a5 Flight model and Graphics problems
« Reply #7 on: January 18, 2001, 10:55:00 PM »
S! Ram

I am very familiar with the pages you are showing.  They are from the engine section in the very back of "Jane's Fighting Aircraft of WWII" and are of course a secondary source.

I don't have a scanner and don't know how to post documents on this board so I may just send you the material directly.  I may also hand you over to another fellow who is more of an authority on the 190 and who has all the documents from original sources.

funked

  • Guest
190a5 Flight model and Graphics problems
« Reply #8 on: January 19, 2001, 12:19:00 AM »
If you have a primary source indicating that MW 50 was used on any Fw 190A models, I would love to see it!

The best I have is a translation of the pilot's handbook which indicates that the A-8 used a boost override system that was dry (no MW 50), and that GM-1 was an option.  Performance charts accompanying the manual indicate the 355 mph speed at sea level was obtained using the boost override.  The manual also describes the supplementary petrol injection system but indicates that it had been phased out of production.

[This message has been edited by funked (edited 01-19-2001).]

Offline RAM

  • Parolee
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
190a5 Flight model and Graphics problems
« Reply #9 on: January 19, 2001, 02:33:00 AM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by Buzzbait:
S! Ram

I am very familiar with the pages you are showing.  They are from the engine section in the very back of "Jane's Fighting Aircraft of WWII" and are of course a secondary source.
.

I agree with funked. Any documentation you have on instalation of MW50 in Fw190As will be greatly welcome here (email is on the profile)


BTW the pages I posted-yes, from Jane's- are not to proof anything, but as a description of the systems used by the germans as boosters. Its a fairly good and short enough description, short enough to post it here  

Offline MANDOBLE

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1849
      • http://www.terra.es/personal2/matias.s
190a5 Flight model and Graphics problems
« Reply #10 on: January 19, 2001, 03:51:00 AM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by RAM:
...But I find highly questionable that with a ROF of 650 rpm ,the bandits are able to cross my bullet streams without getting hit. This happens a lot to me (and to more 190 drivers).
[This message has been edited by RAM (edited 01-19-2001).]

This happens to me every day.
Lets suppose a general ROF of 650 RPM for the 4x20 in A8, lets suppose you are perpendiculary aligned with the enemy flight path, lets suppose the enemy length is 10 meters and is flying at 350 kmh. You start firing before the enemy crosses in front of you, and, of course, you'll have chance to hit that plane just while its entire lenght crosses your fire zone. A 10 meters plane will spend 0.103 seconds to advance 10 meters flying at 350 kmh. So, you'll have some part of the enemy in front of any of your guns just for 0.103 seconds. In 0.103 seconds your 4x20 will hit 4.46 times the enemy plane.
As you can see, this is an extreme example with an enemy crossing fast in front of you.

My main problem with 151/20 is the aiming. You have tracer... ...an eternity.. ..tracer.. ..an eternity.. ..tracer.. You have little chance to correct your aiming point based on the tracers. This could be a ROF related problem, or it could be just because we have 50 bullets between tracer and tracer.

Offline Jekyll

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 89
      • http://www.bigpond.net.au/phoenix
190a5 Flight model and Graphics problems
« Reply #11 on: January 19, 2001, 05:04:00 AM »
650 RPM for the Mg151/20 is certainly too low.

Name  Ammunition  Rate of Fire  Muzzle velocity Weight  
Oerlikon F  20 x 72RB (144 g) 500 rpm  550 m/s  24 kg  
Oerlikon L  20 x 101RB (144 g) 350 rpm  670-700m/s  43 kg  
Oerlikon FFL  20 x 101RB (144 g) 500 rpm  750 m/s  30 kg  
Oerlikon S  20 x 110RB (122 g) 280 rpm  830 m/s  62 kg  
Oerlikon FFS  20 x 110RB (122 g) 470 rpm  830 m/s  39 kg  
MG c/30L  20 x 138B (119 g) 350 rpm  900 m/s  64 kg  
MG FF  20 x 80RB (115 g) 520 rpm  570 m/s  28 kg  
MG FF/M  20 x 80RB ( 92 g) 520 rpm  690 m/s  28 kg  
MG 151/20  20 x 82 (115 g) 740 rpm  710 m/s  42 kg  
MG 151/20  20 x 82 ( 92 g) 740 rpm  800 m/s  42 kg  
ShVAK  20 x 99R ( 96 g) 800 rpm  800 m/s  42 kg  
B-20  20 x 99R ( 96 g) 800 rpm  800 m/s  25 kg  
Hispano Mk.II  20 x 110 (130 g) 600 rpm  880 m/s  50 kg  
Hispano Mk.V  20 x 110 (130 g) 750 rpm  840 m/s  42 kg  
Type 97 (Ho-3)  20 x 125 (164 g) 400 rpm  820 m/s  43 kg  
Type 1 (Ho-5)  20 x 94  850 rpm  750 m/s  33 kg  
Type 99 mod 1  20 x 72RB (142 g) 490 rpm  555 m/s  23 kg  
Type 99 mod 2  20 x 101RB (142 g) 490 / 750 rpm  750 m/s  36 kg  

funked

  • Guest
190a5 Flight model and Graphics problems
« Reply #12 on: January 19, 2001, 05:53:00 AM »
Jekyll those are rates for unsynchronized guns.

Offline Jekyll

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 89
      • http://www.bigpond.net.au/phoenix
190a5 Flight model and Graphics problems
« Reply #13 on: January 19, 2001, 08:03:00 AM »
OK funked, and your point is?????

I always understood the outboard cannon on the 190s WERE unsynchronised.  If you time the outboard guns on the 190A5 you will find that they only fire at about 620-630 RPM.  That's way low for the 151/20.

500 shells, 250 per gun.  Guns empty in 24.84 seconds.  Test it yourself if you like.

Interestingly, the CHog outboard hispanos (presumably Mk IIs), fire at 632 RPM compared to 600 RPM in the above table.  The inboard cannon fire at 651 RPM.

[This message has been edited by Jekyll (edited 01-19-2001).]

[This message has been edited by Jekyll (edited 01-19-2001).]

Offline Hooligan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 889
190a5 Flight model and Graphics problems
« Reply #14 on: January 19, 2001, 09:03:00 AM »
In AH:

The outboard guns fire at 700 and the inboard guns fire at 630.  These numbers match the ROF information I have seen in Rechlin test documents.

 http://home.earthlink.net/~jayboyer/b-20mmTabelle4.jpg

Hooligan