Author Topic: Typhoon Question for Pyro  (Read 419 times)

funked

  • Guest
Typhoon Question for Pyro
« on: March 04, 2001, 07:07:00 PM »
By the bubble canopy it is clear that our Typhoon is a very late Ib.

I am wondering what engine is used in the flight model.  Sabre II, IIa, IIb, IIc, or IV?

Offline juzz

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 193
      • http://nope.haha.com
Typhoon Question for Pyro
« Reply #1 on: March 05, 2001, 08:48:00 AM »
I thought the Sabre IV was a dud engine, only used on the Tempest I prototype(HM 599)? Mmmm, that plane did 466mph though.  

Offline Nashwan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
Typhoon Question for Pyro
« Reply #2 on: March 05, 2001, 09:47:00 AM »
If I can stick a question in as well, will the armament option of 4 rockets and drop tanks be introduced for the Typhoon and/or Tempest?

Offline -duma-

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 41
Typhoon Question for Pyro
« Reply #3 on: March 06, 2001, 05:08:00 PM »
AFAIK Nashwan Tempest never actually used rockets in WWII...

Offline R4M

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 662
Typhoon Question for Pyro
« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2001, 05:14:00 PM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by -duma-:
AFAIK Nashwan Tempest never actually used rockets in WWII...

Dont recall clearly where but some time ago I read that what they didnt use was the rockets wich needed no rails (Even when they were disponible before the war's end), but that they used the ones wich needed rails (like the ones on the Typhoon).


As I said, cant recall the source, sorry  

Offline Nashwan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
Typhoon Question for Pyro
« Reply #5 on: March 06, 2001, 05:39:00 PM »
I think R4Ms right. There is a very good sight on the Tempest at http://user.tninet.se/~ytm843e/tempest.htm
and it says the Tempest was cleared to use zero launch length rockets, but they weren't used operationaly during the war. It also has an illustration of zero length and rail mounted rockets, and the caption says "zero length rocket rails post war only - wartime rocket rails"
It seems to say they were used from rails during the war.
Whether or not they were used however, I don't think they should be kept off the Tempest in AH. Afterall the Spit F IX has them, even though it's real life counterpart never did.
Back to my original question, is the option of  rockets and drop tanks going to be introduced for the Tempest and/or Typhoon?
 

Offline juzz

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 193
      • http://nope.haha.com
Typhoon Question for Pyro
« Reply #6 on: March 06, 2001, 09:53:00 PM »
I think you will have to find evidence that 4 rockets and DT's wasn't a field modification to get it included. Otherwise RAM gets to pull out his cowl guns.  

PS: I doubt any real Spitfire F.IX used a captured German 300 litre drop tank either...  

Offline Nashwan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
Typhoon Question for Pyro
« Reply #7 on: March 07, 2001, 07:31:00 AM »
The Typhoon had a pylon for bomb or drop tank under the inboard cannon. The rocket rails also began there, but moved outwards. The outer 2 rocket rails are easily clear of the bomb/tank.
Any ordinance fitted to an aircraft is a field modification. Planes do not arrive from the factory with bombs or rockets attached. The only "modification" needed would be to attach the tank and attach 2 of the rockets. It requires no more effort or adaption than attaching all rockets.
It is the same option fitted to real life US fighters. They have the option in AH, why not the Tiffie?