Author Topic: dear htc  (Read 1271 times)

Offline xOLLYx

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 61
dear htc
« on: July 17, 2009, 08:28:05 AM »
here is a big wish list all the planes are in il2 1946 and where used in ww2 some are EW MW LW and can be used in FSO or scenarios

USSR

I-153 M62
I-153 T18
1-16 T24
1-185 M71
1-250
LaGG 3
LaGG 31T
LaGG 3RD
MIG 3
MIG 91  300
P63 C-5
PE 21
TB 3
YAK 15 (JET)

POLE

P.11C

RAF
HAWK 81A-2
BEAUFIGHTER MK21


JAP A6M 2N
G4M1-11
KI 27 KO
KI 43 LA
KI 61 1 HEI


GERMAN
DO 335A0
BF109Z
HE 111H2
HE 162 A2
LERCHE III A2
JU87 G1


ITALY CR 42
G 50
IAR 80

i know am not asking for much but thats my wishlist and for my next trick i will be walking on water

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: dear htc
« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2009, 09:24:17 AM »
There's not much place for the A6M2-N even in sceario play. The Float Zeke saw very little use.

There's only scattered evidence of P-63s ever seeing combat.

Do-335 and Bf-109Z never saw combat

AND NO MORE JETS!!!!!!!!  :furious :furious :furious
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Enker

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1553
Re: dear htc
« Reply #2 on: July 17, 2009, 02:11:08 PM »
The Lerche never even made it off the drawing boards.
We already have the Ki-61, unless you speak of some variant.
I have not heard of any evidence that the Yak-15 ever saw combat.

IL-2 is developed by some 100+ people (I think?) whereas Aces High is developed by 10 (I think) Considering that we get around 2 planes per update, there would be a long time before we get all of these. Plus, IL-2 sucks. Need an example? Look at their .50 cals. They are no better than BBs.
i know am not asking for much but thats my wishlist and for my next trick i will be walking on water :rofl Now THAT is an understatement!
InGame ID: Cairn
Quote from: BillyD topic=283300.msg3581799#msg3581799
... FOR TEH MUPPET$ TO PAD OUR SCO?E N to WIN TEH EPIC WAR OF TEH UNIVERSE We MUST VULTCHE DA RUNWAYZ N DROP UR GUYZ FIGHTERZ Bunkarz Then OUR SKWAD will Finarry Get TACTICAL NOOK for 25 KILL SCORE  STREAK>X

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: dear htc
« Reply #3 on: July 17, 2009, 02:13:01 PM »
whereas Aces High is developed by 10 (I think)
I'm pretty sure HiTech, Pyro, Waffle and Superfly are the only ones involved with game development.

The IAR 80 is Romanian, not Italian.

A lot of those planes never saw combat or were never even built. It's called Il2 1946 for a reason :)
« Last Edit: July 17, 2009, 02:14:39 PM by Motherland »

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: dear htc
« Reply #4 on: July 17, 2009, 02:15:30 PM »
...GERMAN...
...HE 111H2...
Now there's a wish I can get behind. :D

+1
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: dear htc
« Reply #5 on: July 17, 2009, 06:13:25 PM »
here is a big wish list all the planes are in il2 1946 and where used in ww2 some are EW MW LW and can be used in FSO or scenarios

USSR
YAK 15 (JET)

First flight was in 1946, WW2 ended in 1945.

Quote
JAP
KI 61 1 HEI

Brings nothing new to the game the version of the Tony we have doesn't already bring to the table. 


Quote
GERMAN
DO 335A0
BF109Z

Only 13 Do 335A-0s were built before the war ended and there is only one report of any Allied pilots encountering one in combat operations when a Frenchman flying for the Free French in the RAF encountered a Do 335A-0 which promptly out ran the RAF Tempest.  Doesn't meet the qualifications to be added to the game.

Bf 109Z "Zwilling" never flew.

Quote
ITALY
IAR 80

It helps when suggesting a wishlist for a plane that you actually do some research so that the very least, you'll know which countries flew which plane.  IAR 80 was a Romanian designed and built fighter not Italian.



ack-ack
« Last Edit: July 17, 2009, 06:16:49 PM by Ack-Ack »
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline texastc316

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1774
      • Mighty 316th
Re: dear htc
« Reply #6 on: July 17, 2009, 06:25:18 PM »
Bring on the IAR 80!!!
TexsTC-CO/Court Jester-Mighty 316th FS "CREEPING DEATH"  in MA/FSO

The eager pilots are not experienced. And the experienced not eager.

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

Offline xOLLYx

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 61
Re: dear htc
« Reply #7 on: July 17, 2009, 07:31:51 PM »
See Rule #6
« Last Edit: July 19, 2009, 11:42:05 AM by Skuzzy »

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: dear htc
« Reply #8 on: July 17, 2009, 08:09:09 PM »
See Rule #6

Just because a certain country's plane set needs to be filled out it doesn't necessarily mean we need to add planes that never saw any action in the war or "What If" planes.  Yes, the .303 rifle caliber round was relatively weak compared to the .50 caliber and cannons used but you have to remember that the .303 is essentially a rifle round.  It can still be very deadly but still not effective as a .50 caliber or cannon.

ack-ack
« Last Edit: July 19, 2009, 11:42:30 AM by Skuzzy »
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Bruv119

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15645
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: dear htc
« Reply #9 on: July 18, 2009, 06:06:35 AM »
the lagg 3  was a  "flying coffin"  POS    if there was ever a hangar queen this would be it .

The I-16 we have in beta and is a very fun plane.

We do need a russian bomber and the TU-2 should be first in line IMO.

and of course we need the uber Yak -3 to complete the yak series.
The Few ***
F.P.H

Offline AirFlyer

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1210
Re: dear htc
« Reply #10 on: July 18, 2009, 07:05:01 AM »
Not so sure on the A6M2-N but it would be cool to have a float plane. Given the choice though I'd rather have the A6M3 21 or 32 model(in that order).
Tours: Airflyer to 69 - 77 | Dustin57 92 - 100 | Spinnich 100 - ?
"You'll always get exactly what you deserve." Neil

Offline xOLLYx

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 61
Re: dear htc
« Reply #11 on: July 18, 2009, 07:42:47 AM »
the A6M2-N can be at the port next to the ships something to blow up has well or fly them has a scout plane for the cv in fso or scenarios

Offline Martyn

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 536
Re: dear htc
« Reply #12 on: July 19, 2009, 06:11:29 AM »
Wot about the Fairey Battle then?  :x
Here we are, living on top of a molten ball of rock, spinning around at a 1,000mph, orbiting a nuclear fireball and whizzing through space at half-a-million miles per hour. Most of us believe in super-beings which for some reason need to be praised for setting this up. This, apparently, is normal.

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: dear htc
« Reply #13 on: July 19, 2009, 11:27:09 AM »
Plus, IL-2 sucks. Need an example? Look at their .50 cals. They are no better than BBs.

I find them to be about the same lethality as AH, but gunnery in general is more difficult in Il-2, which may explain your BB perception.  The only thing I can think of for why it's more difficult in Il-2 is that you don't see large hit strikes from .30 and .50 cal bullets, and so there's a lot less feedback to learn from.
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline Enker

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1553
Re: dear htc
« Reply #14 on: July 19, 2009, 12:14:49 PM »
I find them to be about the same lethality as AH, but gunnery in general is more difficult in Il-2, which may explain your BB perception.  The only thing I can think of for why it's more difficult in Il-2 is that you don't see large hit strikes from .30 and .50 cal bullets, and so there's a lot less feedback to learn from.
The gunnery is different in IL-2, I will agree to that. However, when I am shooting at the suicidal D3A1s at 100 feet, I can get a good 1 second burst into the wing of the D3A1, and I simply get a fire, rather than the "wing being sawn off." If you try it on a He-111, you simply aerate the wing, as you would with any gun until you step it up to cannon rounds. This is why I think .50 cals in IL-2 are screwy. I mean, if you can saw off the wing of a B-17 with .50 cals here, why can you not against a He-111 or Ju-88 in IL-2?
InGame ID: Cairn
Quote from: BillyD topic=283300.msg3581799#msg3581799
... FOR TEH MUPPET$ TO PAD OUR SCO?E N to WIN TEH EPIC WAR OF TEH UNIVERSE We MUST VULTCHE DA RUNWAYZ N DROP UR GUYZ FIGHTERZ Bunkarz Then OUR SKWAD will Finarry Get TACTICAL NOOK for 25 KILL SCORE  STREAK>X