Author Topic: We Need More Spitfires  (Read 2223 times)

Offline juzz

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 193
      • http://nope.haha.com
We Need More Spitfires
« Reply #15 on: March 05, 2001, 08:31:00 AM »
"all good stuff, except the nonsence about a 4 cannon spit VIII."

The RAAF had HF.VIII with 4 cannon, to intercept those pesky Ki-46 Dinah's. I seen the pics.  

Offline Asmodan PL

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10
We Need More Spitfires
« Reply #16 on: March 05, 2001, 11:29:00 AM »
Funked we`r with U !!
Our old Spity is one of the slowest plaes ! we wont a good spit !!!

Offline stegor

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 482
We Need More Spitfires
« Reply #17 on: March 05, 2001, 12:36:00 PM »
Uaaahhhh!!! ....mum a bad knight said me he has a 109 fastest than my spit..uahhhh mum I want a Griffon uahhhh...  

uahhh!!! dad that nasty rook told me his cousin will have a fast Dora , buy me a multi turbolaser pokemon spit!!! I want it!!

Dont worry my little son i'll make them be all perked by the good little fairy    

And they lived all  pleased and happy  

Nibbio joking  
Nibbio
4° Stormo C.T. "F. Baracca"


TheWobble

  • Guest
We Need More Spitfires
« Reply #18 on: March 05, 2001, 12:37:00 PM »
Ya got the seafire last realease, yer gettin the Tempest very soon, yet ya still cry!  

WHERS MY NEW P-38 VERSION!??

Offline Nashwan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
We Need More Spitfires
« Reply #19 on: March 05, 2001, 03:40:00 PM »
Yes bring in the P-38F and perk the P-38L.
In fact, level the playing field and perk all planes released after 1942  

funked

  • Guest
We Need More Spitfires
« Reply #20 on: March 05, 2001, 04:37:00 PM »
Lightnings are nice, but not nearly as historically significant as the Spitfire.  

Lightnings were only in combat for what, two years?  Lightnings were a third-line aircraft behind the P-51, P-47, F6F, F4U, which did most of the killing.

Spitfires were the most numerous and most effective fighter of the RAF and were on the front lines from 1940 until the very end.  In addition they served very successfully with the air forces of several allied nations, in four theaters of operation.

There is no comparison.

[This message has been edited by funked (edited 03-05-2001).]

Offline R4M

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 662
We Need More Spitfires
« Reply #21 on: March 05, 2001, 04:47:00 PM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by funked:
Lightnings are nice, but not nearly as historically significant as the Spitfire.

<cracks a cold one and sits down...thunder is hear far away, but is approaching fast>

Ohhh sad that Citabria is not here any longer  



Offline Thud

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 476
We Need More Spitfires
« Reply #22 on: March 05, 2001, 05:40:00 PM »
I know that the VVS and Japanese are the first to deserve some new planes, and then the first priority in my not so hidden agenda is the Hurricane. The Spits mentioned above all are nice rides but first things first

------------------
Thud/Bies

Bring the Hurricane (MKIIC) to AH! (together with the Invader)


funked

  • Guest
We Need More Spitfires
« Reply #23 on: March 05, 2001, 06:27:00 PM »
Hey if you guys want to ask for your silly little planes go start your own threads!  I guess it's easier to destroy than to create.  

Offline SKurj

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3630
We Need More Spitfires
« Reply #24 on: March 05, 2001, 10:01:00 PM »
I thought the E wing was the 2 20's and 2 .50's.... which we already have

SKurj

Offline Tac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4085
We Need More Spitfires
« Reply #25 on: March 05, 2001, 10:20:00 PM »
"Spitfires were the most numerous and most effective fighter of the RAF and were on the front lines from 1940 until the very end"

Really? I thought there was a boatload more of Hurricanes than spitfires throught the whole war... and Hurricanes even had higher K/D than spits I believe.

Another case of "pretty sissy" plane turned over to the media.  

funked

  • Guest
We Need More Spitfires
« Reply #26 on: March 05, 2001, 10:32:00 PM »
 
Quote
I thought there was a boatload more of Hurricanes than spitfires throught the whole war... and Hurricanes even had higher K/D than spits I believe.

No and No.
Go Away.

More Spits!!!

------------------
   
FunkedUp, Officer Commanding, 308 (Polish) Squadron "City of Cracow" RAF
Northolt Wing (1st Polish Fighter Wing)

"We had been forced to fight.  And now that we are fighting, we thought, we'll teach you rotten Huns how to fight.  We'll shoot your pissy little fighters out of the sky, we'll rip your dirty great bombers to shreds, we'll make you wish to Christ you'd never heard of the aeroplane!"

[This message has been edited by funked (edited 03-05-2001).]

TheWobble

  • Guest
We Need More Spitfires
« Reply #27 on: March 05, 2001, 11:15:00 PM »
there is 1 type of typhoon in AH
there is 1 type of P-38 in AH
there is 1 type of lanc in AH
there is 1 type of Ju-88 in AH
there is 1 type of B-17 in AH
there is NO japanese bomber in AH
there are 3 types of spitfire in AH


and AH needs more spitfires......
...yea Ok.

funked

  • Guest
We Need More Spitfires
« Reply #28 on: March 05, 2001, 11:27:00 PM »
Wobble, if you want those planes, ask for them.  This is the ask for Spitfires thread.  More Spits!!!

Offline juzz

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 193
      • http://nope.haha.com
We Need More Spitfires
« Reply #29 on: March 06, 2001, 01:44:00 AM »
There are no Japanese Army a/c - show me the Shoki!