Author Topic: AUGUST FSO: TACLOBAN TANGO  (Read 5541 times)

Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: AUGUST FSO: TACLOBAN TANGO
« Reply #15 on: July 27, 2009, 08:51:51 PM »
Speaking of which, I wonder when the 4 and Charlie Hogs are gonna get some FSO love. Both variants were involved during the time setting of the Okinawa FSO a couple months back....

I'd think the only times the F4U-1C and F4U-4 will see FSO action is the Okinawa setup, or perhaps a mainland Japan setup like Nef did a couple of years ago. 
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech

Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: AUGUST FSO: TACLOBAN TANGO
« Reply #16 on: July 27, 2009, 08:55:45 PM »
I believe a little research will find that the 201st and 341st Kokutai were in the Phillipines in Late 1944 with N1K1 "George" aircraft.  

Its not really a question of "were they in theater".  The N1K1 is different from what we have, and the Ki-84's firepower, if not top speed, is a better parallel to the N1K1.
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech

Offline fudgums

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3875
Re: AUGUST FSO: TACLOBAN TANGO
« Reply #17 on: July 27, 2009, 08:59:38 PM »
Last Augusts FSO had N1KJs in it. I'll try to find the setup.
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27

Offline Shifty

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9377
      • 307th FS
Re: AUGUST FSO: TACLOBAN TANGO
« Reply #18 on: July 27, 2009, 09:37:38 PM »
Last Augusts FSO had N1KJs in it. I'll try to find the setup.

What does that have to do with this setup?
Just asking.

JG-11"Black Hearts"...nur die Stolzen, nur die Starken

"Haji may have blown my legs off but I'm still a stud"~ SPC Thomas Vandeventer Delta1/5 1st CAV

Offline fudgums

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3875
Re: AUGUST FSO: TACLOBAN TANGO
« Reply #19 on: July 27, 2009, 09:39:31 PM »
What does that have to do with this setup?
Just asking.

It was Battle of Leyte Gulf, Which was October 23-26 1944, which is 2 months before this setup.
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27

Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: AUGUST FSO: TACLOBAN TANGO
« Reply #20 on: July 27, 2009, 09:48:07 PM »
It was Battle of Leyte Gulf, Which was October 23-26 1944, which is 2 months before this setup.

Nef chose to include the N1K2 for balance purposes, not because it was historically present.
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech

Offline Shifty

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9377
      • 307th FS
Re: AUGUST FSO: TACLOBAN TANGO
« Reply #21 on: July 27, 2009, 09:51:34 PM »
Never mind Stoney gave the answer.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2009, 09:54:49 PM by Shifty »

JG-11"Black Hearts"...nur die Stolzen, nur die Starken

"Haji may have blown my legs off but I'm still a stud"~ SPC Thomas Vandeventer Delta1/5 1st CAV

Offline fudgums

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3875
Re: AUGUST FSO: TACLOBAN TANGO
« Reply #22 on: July 27, 2009, 09:55:40 PM »
Nef chose to include the N1K2 for balance purposes, not because it was historically present.
Didnt know, disregard

"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: AUGUST FSO: TACLOBAN TANGO
« Reply #23 on: July 29, 2009, 03:21:01 PM »
This is gonna look gorgeous with the new terrain. :x :x :x
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Nefarious

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15858
Re: AUGUST FSO: TACLOBAN TANGO
« Reply #24 on: July 29, 2009, 03:43:59 PM »
This is gonna look gorgeous with the new terrain. :x :x :x

Will the old Terrain be compatible with the new version (I haven't downloaded the new version yet)
There must also be a flyable computer available for Nefarious to do FSO. So he doesn't keep talking about it for eight and a half hours on Friday night!

Offline ghostdancer

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7562
Re: AUGUST FSO: TACLOBAN TANGO
« Reply #25 on: July 29, 2009, 03:47:52 PM »
We have submit a list of priority terrains to get update to BETA. Top of the list is Luzon and Coral Sea.
X.O. 29th TFT, "We Move Mountains"
CM Terrain Team

Offline Nefarious

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15858
Re: AUGUST FSO: TACLOBAN TANGO
« Reply #26 on: July 29, 2009, 05:37:15 PM »
 :aok
There must also be a flyable computer available for Nefarious to do FSO. So he doesn't keep talking about it for eight and a half hours on Friday night!

Offline Bino

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5937
Re: AUGUST FSO: TACLOBAN TANGO
« Reply #27 on: August 01, 2009, 09:51:45 AM »
:rofl

I agree that the Messerschmitt Bf-110C-4/B is not a great standin for the Kawasaki Ki-45 KAIb. 

But it's the closest we've got.  At the moment.  For the time being.  >sigh<


"The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'." - Randy Pausch

PC Specs

Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: AUGUST FSO: TACLOBAN TANGO
« Reply #28 on: August 01, 2009, 09:54:21 AM »
Well, here's the choice gentlemen:  we either accept the 110-C as a sub for the Ki-45 or we get rid of it all together.  I myself usually hate sub aircraft, but the performance difference is slight, and it adds variety to an otherwise deficient planeset.
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: AUGUST FSO: TACLOBAN TANGO
« Reply #29 on: August 01, 2009, 10:44:15 AM »
Well, here's the choice gentlemen:  we either accept the 110-C as a sub for the Ki-45 or we get rid of it all together.  I myself usually hate sub aircraft, but the performance difference is slight, and it adds variety to an otherwise deficient planeset.

Get rid of it.
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!