Author Topic: B-29  (Read 1317 times)

Offline sandwich

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 590
B-29
« on: July 29, 2009, 12:56:16 PM »
no not really

although i would like the 262 to be able to carry a bomb

Offline opposum

  • Probation
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 467
Re: B-29
« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2009, 01:52:42 PM »
+1  :aok
/_|o[____]o
[1---L-OllllllO-
()_)()_)=°°=)_)

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: B-29
« Reply #2 on: July 29, 2009, 02:38:38 PM »
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline CrosFire

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 244
Re: B-29
« Reply #3 on: July 29, 2009, 04:05:58 PM »
+2
When he gets to heaven to St.Peter he will tell one more marine reporting sir Ive served my time in hell. -Marine on the "Canal"

Offline thedudee95

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 218
Re: B-29
« Reply #4 on: July 29, 2009, 04:52:34 PM »
Darnit :(

I was so ready to post this:


Offline Dream Child

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 256
Re: B-29
« Reply #5 on: July 29, 2009, 06:48:46 PM »
i would like the 262 to be able to carry a bomb

Well, Hitler did insist it was a bomber, so...

Offline sandwich

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 590
Re: B-29
« Reply #6 on: July 29, 2009, 06:56:12 PM »
why not

i would love to see who would use it as a dive bomber

Offline Enker

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1553
Re: B-29
« Reply #7 on: July 29, 2009, 07:22:39 PM »
No.
InGame ID: Cairn
Quote from: BillyD topic=283300.msg3581799#msg3581799
... FOR TEH MUPPET$ TO PAD OUR SCO?E N to WIN TEH EPIC WAR OF TEH UNIVERSE We MUST VULTCHE DA RUNWAYZ N DROP UR GUYZ FIGHTERZ Bunkarz Then OUR SKWAD will Finarry Get TACTICAL NOOK for 25 KILL SCORE  STREAK>X

Offline legoman

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 339
Re: B-29
« Reply #8 on: July 31, 2009, 09:41:33 PM »
I think it would be a good idea but is should cost points. A bomber with that much payload should not be free.
Would seem my only decent plane

Offline stealth

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1338
Re: B-29
« Reply #9 on: July 31, 2009, 09:48:06 PM »
no not really

although i would like the 262 to be able to carry a bomb
Ive seen this been said alot of times I just posted it once.I think we know that we are not getting one i would love it just to have the bomb load of the b24 i just wanna fly a bomber that big but it's still a good idea.
My Email is ACalex88@gmail.com if you want to contact me

"I shall fear no evil, for I am 80,000 feet and climbing"

Offline sandwich

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 590
Re: B-29
« Reply #10 on: July 31, 2009, 11:03:43 PM »
I think it would be a good idea but is should cost points. A bomber with that much payload should not be free.
it only carries 1000 pounds of ords

Offline legoman

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 339
Re: B-29
« Reply #11 on: July 31, 2009, 11:06:52 PM »
The b-29!?!
Would seem my only decent plane

Offline Enker

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1553
Re: B-29
« Reply #12 on: August 01, 2009, 01:38:48 AM »
Ive seen this been said alot of times I just posted it once.I think we know that we are not getting one i would love it just to have the bomb load of the b24 i just wanna fly a bomber that big but it's still a good idea.
No. A bomber at 33,000+ up and at 375+ top speed with the bomb loadout of a 24 would be unbalancing.

Also, if you want to fly a B-29, have I got a game for you.
InGame ID: Cairn
Quote from: BillyD topic=283300.msg3581799#msg3581799
... FOR TEH MUPPET$ TO PAD OUR SCO?E N to WIN TEH EPIC WAR OF TEH UNIVERSE We MUST VULTCHE DA RUNWAYZ N DROP UR GUYZ FIGHTERZ Bunkarz Then OUR SKWAD will Finarry Get TACTICAL NOOK for 25 KILL SCORE  STREAK>X

Offline Ruler2

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 923
Re: B-29
« Reply #13 on: August 01, 2009, 01:53:12 AM »
ya know we have an SBD right?  :P

Offline sandwich

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 590
Re: B-29
« Reply #14 on: August 01, 2009, 02:07:21 PM »