Author Topic: J2M"Raiden"  (Read 419 times)

Offline GhostCDB

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1730
J2M"Raiden"
« on: July 30, 2009, 11:20:00 AM »
The J2M would be a nice addition to the Jap Candle Collection also :)


Top Gun

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: J2M"Raiden"
« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2009, 11:31:06 AM »
J2M would be nice, but the Ki-43, Ki-44, Ki-45 and G4M are all MUCH higher-priority additions.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10196
Re: J2M"Raiden"
« Reply #2 on: July 30, 2009, 11:35:32 AM »
I like the idea.  I will let HTC decide priority of inclusion to the inventory.
CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: J2M"Raiden"
« Reply #3 on: July 30, 2009, 12:12:18 PM »
I believe he was discussing priority on a player-basis decided by its usefulness in events and the MA.
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: J2M"Raiden"
« Reply #4 on: July 30, 2009, 12:15:41 PM »
I believe he was discussing priority on a player-basis decided by its usefulness in events and the MA.

Yup. Ki-43, 44, 45 and G4M would all see far more usage in scenario events. The Ki-43 and G4M--the most important IJAAF fighter and Japanese level bomber of the war--being absent from the plane set especially is all but inexcusable.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10196
Re: J2M"Raiden"
« Reply #5 on: July 30, 2009, 12:38:12 PM »
I believe he was discussing priority on a player-basis decided by its usefulness in events and the MA.

CC that.  I always wondered what folks are basing their priorities on, and it seems that we all have different things that motivate our preferred order of inclusion into AH.  Mine are a bit less stringent than most, I just want everything world War II and love whatever new toys do come along.
CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!