Author Topic: we need a junkers ju 52/3m  (Read 1247 times)

Offline stealth

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1340
we need a junkers ju 52/3m
« on: July 30, 2009, 09:13:34 PM »
This planes crew was 3 and it could carry 18 troops. It could also drop a small load of bombs. This plane was a German c47 realy cruise.Speed was 165mph I think we need this plane because mostly it would be a nice plane for aceshigh what about you.:)
My Email is ACalex88@gmail.com if you want to contact me

"I shall fear no evil, for I am 80,000 feet and climbing"

Offline ACE

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5569
Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2009, 09:37:04 PM »
nope it would be a lot harder to defend bases
Sixth Tri-Annual Dueling Bracket Champion

The Few

-Spek

Offline stealth

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1340
Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
« Reply #2 on: July 30, 2009, 09:41:22 PM »
nope it would be a lot harder to defend bases
where do you get this stuff are you just typing this in my post junkers a cool plane we need more bombers
My Email is ACalex88@gmail.com if you want to contact me

"I shall fear no evil, for I am 80,000 feet and climbing"

Offline ACE

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5569
Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
« Reply #3 on: July 30, 2009, 09:44:35 PM »
Use better grammer. We don't need 18 troops falling.
Sixth Tri-Annual Dueling Bracket Champion

The Few

-Spek

Offline stealth

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1340
Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
« Reply #4 on: July 30, 2009, 09:50:00 PM »
Use better grammer. We don't need 18 troops falling.
just telling you what it could carry
My Email is ACalex88@gmail.com if you want to contact me

"I shall fear no evil, for I am 80,000 feet and climbing"

Offline ACE

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5569
Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
« Reply #5 on: July 30, 2009, 09:53:59 PM »
Still 18 troops would be waaaaaay to much
Sixth Tri-Annual Dueling Bracket Champion

The Few

-Spek

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
« Reply #6 on: July 30, 2009, 10:14:27 PM »
We just had a thread about this. The Ju-52 is about as far down the list of priorities as you can get. Even the B-29 would fill more of a role than the Ju-52.

In the Mains it would see only limited use. It has light defensive armament, but not that much better than a TBM. And in a MUCH slower aircraft. In fact, it's slower than even the C-47.

In scenario use the Ju-52 likewise has limited usefulness, as even C-47s rarely--if ever--see use. Certainly FSO hasn't used C-47s since my squadron has been flying them. Furthermore, I've RARELY seen base capture turned on in AvA when I've popped in, so once again there's not much for it to do there.

Would it be nice eventually for nostalgia? Sure. But there's other aircraft that are FAR more important and useful missing (if you want a German plane, try the He-111).
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline AKP

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1294
Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
« Reply #7 on: July 30, 2009, 11:15:53 PM »
This planes crew was 3 and it could carry 18 troops. It could also drop a small load of bombs. This plane was a German c47 realy cruise.Speed was 165mph I think we need this plane because mostly it would be a nice plane for aceshigh what about you.:)

Ok Larry... stop it.  Its not funny anymore.  :rofl

***G3-MF***

Offline stealth

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1340
Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
« Reply #8 on: July 31, 2009, 01:54:40 AM »
Ok Larry... stop it.  Its not funny anymore.  :rofl
IM NO LARRY :mad:
My Email is ACalex88@gmail.com if you want to contact me

"I shall fear no evil, for I am 80,000 feet and climbing"

Offline Larry

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6123
Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
« Reply #9 on: July 31, 2009, 03:53:23 AM »
Ok Larry... stop it.  Its not funny anymore.  :rofl

How dare you!!! I cant 'speel' like him even when I try, and come on I'm better then that. I wouldn't flood the forums with useless threads like he is doing. Id make one really good thread that would draw in so many fish that PETA and those whale wars people would be trying to break down my door.
« Last Edit: July 31, 2009, 03:59:46 AM by Larry »
Once known as ''TrueKill''.
JG 54 "Grünherz"
July '18 KOTH Winner


Offline stealth

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1340
Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
« Reply #10 on: July 31, 2009, 04:07:40 AM »
How dare you!!! I cant 'speel' like him even when I try, and come on I'm better then that. I wouldn't flood the forums with useless threads like he is doing. Id make one really good thread that would draw in so many fish that PETA and those whale wars people would be trying to break down my door.

YES THANK YOU SEE IM NO LARRY
My Email is ACalex88@gmail.com if you want to contact me

"I shall fear no evil, for I am 80,000 feet and climbing"

Offline stealth

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1340
Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
« Reply #11 on: July 31, 2009, 04:13:31 AM »
Only put out reply's on this if you are gunna put out a reply that deals with the topic please no he's 12 or use grammer.Please thank you have a nice day.
My Email is ACalex88@gmail.com if you want to contact me

"I shall fear no evil, for I am 80,000 feet and climbing"

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
« Reply #12 on: July 31, 2009, 06:12:48 AM »
How dare you!!! I cant 'speel' like him even when I try, and come on I'm better then that. I wouldn't flood the forums with useless threads like he is doing.

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,264206.0.html
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,268660.0.html

 ;)

Offline Larry

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6123
Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
« Reply #13 on: July 31, 2009, 08:42:55 AM »
Oh no, two threads that were meant to get laughs that were posted over two months apart. How dare I flood the wishlist forums like that! I should just post eleven threads over, what, four days full of gibberish. Hell I wouldn't even look at the first page I spammed to look if someone has already made a thread asking for the same damn thing.  :rolleyes:
Once known as ''TrueKill''.
JG 54 "Grünherz"
July '18 KOTH Winner


shifty95

  • Guest
Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
« Reply #14 on: July 31, 2009, 08:47:14 AM »
Still 18 troops would be waaaaaay to much

actually, in reality, the c47 could hold up to 28 armed troops. we could water it down to hold 10, like we did with the c47.