Author Topic: bf109 .. why two names for same aircraft?  (Read 1112 times)

Offline chisel1

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13
bf109 .. why two names for same aircraft?
« Reply #15 on: November 23, 2001, 01:51:00 PM »
Thanks Butch I stand corrected...Never seen one before.


PPl argue it because there is no definitive clearcut answer it seems. Think about it..... they built some 30,000 of these planes only 60 years ago and the absolute provable answer may be lost to history.

Anyone wanna talk about the double tagged G10, release date G14, K4 controversy?  ;)

Offline Raubvogel

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3882
bf109 .. why two names for same aircraft?
« Reply #16 on: November 23, 2001, 02:19:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by -lynx-:
Small correction there Raub - IL2 takes the top spot with 109 close second.


That's debatable.

Offline Vector

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 534
bf109 .. why two names for same aircraft?
« Reply #17 on: November 24, 2001, 01:14:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by chisel:

Anyone wanna talk about the double tagged G10, release date G14, K4 controversy?   ;)

Yup, all G-10's were repaired/upgraded G-2...6 series fighters that been damaged in the front lines and sent back to factory.

K- designation came from word "Königfisher" and all K-series had tailhook.
 :D

-vector

--------------------
 
    414 RCAF THE BLACK KNIGHTS
"Totis Viribus-With All Our Might"