That is a nice sentiment in a sort of 'Kumbaya lets all get along' sort of way.
Practically speaking though, it is pie in the sky dreaming of how the 'perfect world of aces high' should exist. For example, lets for argument sake say a person does not want to interfere with others having fun, which is undoubtedly true for the majority of players.
How would one know that they are interfering with someone else? Do you ask on range for permission, on country channel? Would it be based on the 'majority' of players in the area saying yah or nay, or if one person says no, do you end your sortie? What about conflicting interest? Say a base is strategically located for the 'win the war' crowd, but that base is also where two squads are having fun going at it. Does the 'win the war' crowd sacrifice attacking a chosen base because some other group might not like it.
How about the guy that wants to drop a VH hangar, but inadvertently stops a gv battle at some other location? Should hangars just be made in-destructable so this problem could never exist? It's absurd, and there is a DA perfect to avoid this problem.
Hangars go down for 15 minutes, then they spawn right back up. IMO, it's best just to stop whining about how terrible things are.