Author Topic: JU-87D Conversion  (Read 1769 times)

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23872
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: JU-87D Conversion
« Reply #30 on: August 29, 2009, 09:09:44 AM »
Anyone from HTC have input as to why we don't have this?

Not high enough on the priority list?
So many things to add, so little time?

You rarely get answers on questions like this, probably because they never end.... "Why no B-29? Why no Do 217? Why no Mig-3?... Why no (insert hundreds of planes and vehicles here) ;)
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline ToeTag

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1113
Re: JU-87D Conversion
« Reply #31 on: August 29, 2009, 03:04:57 PM »
you dont have to add a new plane just the cannon.  Seems like a simple thing to do instead of modeling a whole new plane.
They call it "common sense", then why is it so uncommon?

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: JU-87D Conversion
« Reply #32 on: August 29, 2009, 03:52:44 PM »
Whats your in game name Toe?

You must be a real GV terror to fly one of the worst airplanes view-wise, IL2, without resorting to F3 like the rest of us smelly serfs.
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15640
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
Re: JU-87D Conversion
« Reply #33 on: August 29, 2009, 03:57:02 PM »
you dont have to add a new plane just the cannon.  Seems like a simple thing to do instead of modeling a whole new plane.
If they did that they would Re-do the graphics for said plane...
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline ToeTag

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1113
Re: JU-87D Conversion
« Reply #34 on: August 31, 2009, 06:59:23 AM »
Whats your in game name Toe?

You must be a real GV terror to fly one of the worst airplanes view-wise, IL2, without resorting to F3 like the rest of us smelly serfs.

Dingbat

If you adjust your head views and save them by hitting F10 it does get better.  Rear still stinks.
They call it "common sense", then why is it so uncommon?

Offline l0newolf

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 86
Re: JU-87D Conversion
« Reply #35 on: September 06, 2009, 08:18:26 PM »
but it couldent carry bombs that was the problem... :uhoh

Offline ToeTag

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1113
Re: JU-87D Conversion
« Reply #36 on: September 07, 2009, 07:56:13 AM »
That might be a new ford vs chevy argument  :aok
They call it "common sense", then why is it so uncommon?