« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Down

Author Topic: Planes I'd like to see in 1.09  (Read 3382 times)

Offline Jochen

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 188
      • http://www.jannousiainen.net
Planes I'd like to see in 1.09
« Reply #15 on: December 04, 2001, 04:03:00 AM »
K-4 is essentially same as G-10 we have now. No 15 mm MG 151's were installed and controls were identical I believe so maneuverability is about identical.
Logged
jochen Gefechtsverband Kowalewski

Units: I. and II./KG 51, II. and III./KG 76, NSGr 1, NSGr 2, NSGr 20.
Planes: Do 17Z, Ju 87D, Ju 88A, He 111H, Ar 234A, Me 410A, Me 262A, Fw 190A, Fw 190F, Fw 190G.

Sieg oder bolsevismus!

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
Planes I'd like to see in 1.09
« Reply #16 on: December 04, 2001, 04:13:00 AM »
Spitfire MkIa
 Spitfire MkXIV (perk)
 Hurricane MkI (8 x .303)
 Bf-109E7 (or E4)
 Bf-109G14 (MW50)
 F4F Wildcat
 SBD Dauntless
 P-40B
 P-40C
 D3A1
 Ki-21
 Ki-43 Hayabusa
 Ki-84 Hayate(perk)
 Ki-67
 La-3
 Yak-1B
 Yak-3
 

 ...

 This about solves the early/mid war plane sets we're missing, + addition of few late war variants to those 'deprived' countries.

 The Bf-109G-14's to be the link between G-6 and G-10... and I seem to have heard our G-10 is a tad bit more powerful than the historic G-10, almost simular performance with the K-4 even. If this is true,I woud like our G-10 toned down a bit, and add in a K-4 and make that a perk. Just personal preference... and this way AH finally has all the most representative 109 series in its collection  :)
Logged

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
Planes I'd like to see in 1.09
« Reply #17 on: December 04, 2001, 04:22:00 AM »
OOpsss.. checked my sources..

 "... as a result, the Bf-109G10 had appeared even later than the 109K4. The G-10 was to be the fastest, final evolution of the "Gustav" series, and the "Kurfurst" was designed for high altitude performance. In technical terms, those two are different planes, but in performance virtually identical."

 .. Sorry 'bout that mistake  :)

 Is G-14 still a go?
Logged

Offline fats

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 210
Planes I'd like to see in 1.09
« Reply #18 on: December 04, 2001, 05:53:00 AM »
Wells,

That's what I've read as well. I am guessing the performance difference between G-10 and K-4 would make 0 impact in the arena. Anyone interested check a speed curve or a climb curve against what we have at AH web page, there prolly ain't much of a difference ( less than %5 ).

Hadn't heard about the reason for removing the wheel doors before though.


// fats
Logged

Offline Seeker

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
Planes I'd like to see in 1.09
« Reply #19 on: December 04, 2001, 05:59:00 AM »
Shtoooooooooooooooooka!
Logged

Offline Broes

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 224
Planes I'd like to see in 1.09
« Reply #20 on: December 04, 2001, 06:14:00 AM »
HE-111
Ju 87 dive bomb/37 cannon version
Ju 84 troop carrier
He 163 for HQ def only  :)

Broes
Logged

Offline oboe

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9805
Planes I'd like to see in 1.09
« Reply #21 on: December 04, 2001, 07:03:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Soviet:
what would the Ki-84 be good at i've always wanted a good Japanese plane, A6m5 is too slow, Nik2 has too low an ENY, Ki-61 rolls like crap.... Ki-84 Looks kinda evil too   :)

The Ki.84 gives the Japanese planeset a much needed boost in speed, with a max speed anywhere from 392-422 mph depending on your sources.   It possesses outstanding acceleration and climb ability, and a decent guns package (2x20mm, 2x12.7mm).  It has butterfly flaps to improve low-speed maneueverability.

It should stack up well against the LA-7 and the Spit IX in the MA.
Logged

Offline Darkglam

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Planes I'd like to see in 1.09
« Reply #22 on: December 10, 2001, 02:58:00 AM »
My favorites add-on for next versions.

 - Me 109 G6/U4
 - Me 109 G14 (Unperked)
 - Me 109 K4 (Unperked)
 - Me 110 G series (With music box)
 - He 219
 - Ju 87  
 - Me 163(only for HQ defense)
 - He 111
 - Do 217
 - Ki 84
 - B-24
 - B-25
 - P-40
 - Yak 3
 - Pe 2
 - I-15
 - I-16
 - SM 79
 - G55
 ....
Logged

Offline Staga

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5334
      • http://www.nohomersclub.com/
Planes I'd like to see in 1.09
« Reply #23 on: December 10, 2001, 04:47:00 AM »
I guess there were a reason why Messerschmitt added Flettner-tabs in model 109K ?
Logged

Offline J_A_B

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3012
Planes I'd like to see in 1.09
« Reply #24 on: December 10, 2001, 05:34:00 AM »
"and I seem to have heard our G-10 is a tad bit more powerful than the historic G-10"

It depends on whether you believe the 428 MPH figure the real G-10 possessed, or the 458 the Germans claimed it could do.

J_A_B
Logged

Offline Citabria

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5149
Planes I'd like to see in 1.09
« Reply #25 on: December 10, 2001, 08:29:00 AM »
b24
109g6AS
b25
p38f
ki84
Logged
Fester was my in game name until September 2013

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Planes I'd like to see in 1.09
« Reply #26 on: December 10, 2001, 09:12:00 AM »
F7F Tigercat
P61
P40E
Betty Bomber
Logged

Offline Archangel114

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 25
      • http://flightsimmers.net/runway/azhaircraft
Planes I'd like to see in 1.09
« Reply #27 on: December 10, 2001, 07:37:00 PM »
Rip, I agree with you on all except for the F7F. If I'm not mistaken(and I may very well be)the Tigercat didn't enter service untill after WW2. If it did, show me some proof and I'll agree with you on all of 'em :-D

-Chris-

Don't forget the IL-10!!!
Logged

Offline ra

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3569
Planes I'd like to see in 1.09
« Reply #28 on: December 10, 2001, 07:54:00 PM »
The Me-163 for HQ defense sounds like a good idea, but only if it cost quite a few perkies.  Those Lanc and B-17 drivers spend a lot of time getting to an HQ at 25K, so the guys who get to make quick attacks on them with the 163 should have to pay for the ride.  Maybe 200 perkies.

ra
Logged

Offline M.C.202

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 244
Planes I'd like to see in 1.09
« Reply #29 on: December 11, 2001, 12:32:00 AM »
Archangel said:
Rip, I agree with you on all except for the F7F. If I'm not mistaken(and I may very well be)the Tigercat didn't enter service untill after WW2. If it did, show me some proof and I'll agree with you on all of 'em :-D
End Quote

A contract for 500 was placed after the first flight on 3 Nov 1943.Deliveries started on April '44. It was in squadron service, but did not "see combat".

That "see combat will make half the folks say skip it, but I'd love to see it. It could do everything but transport troops  :D
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Up
« previous next »