Author Topic: M18 Hellcat  (Read 819 times)

Offline Panzerace

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 68
M18 Hellcat
« on: August 17, 2009, 10:33:27 PM »
It would be nice to have a Tank Destroyer out in the field.
“No poor bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making other bastards die for their country.” GSP

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: M18 Hellcat
« Reply #1 on: August 17, 2009, 11:12:54 PM »
It was fast, and had a 75mm gun (same as the Firefly, maybe?) but it was so lightly armored that machine guns could and did penetrate its 1-inch armor. Troop commanders didn't understand it was NOT a tank, and tried to send it in first with infantry behind, and they would be lost quickly.

In AH it'd be a sitting duck to anything including an M8.

Actually, it'd kind of be like an up-gunned M8 in performance, I'd bet.

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8802
Re: M18 Hellcat
« Reply #2 on: August 18, 2009, 12:51:33 AM »
It was fast, and had a 75mm gun (same as the Firefly, maybe?) but it was so lightly armored that machine guns could and did penetrate its 1-inch armor. Troop commanders didn't understand it was NOT a tank, and tried to send it in first with infantry behind, and they would be lost quickly.

In AH it'd be a sitting duck to anything including an M8.

Actually, it'd kind of be like an up-gunned M8 in performance, I'd bet.

M18s had the best kill to loss ratio of any western Allied armored vehicle. It was armed with the M1 76mm gun shooting HVAP ammo, which could penetrate a Panther's front armor at 1,000 yards. These things were extremely lethal. They were generally used to ambush German tanks, then use their 60 mph speed to reposition. Their armor could keep out machine gun rounds and 20mm as well. The armor was well sloped and lacked the shot traps common to most tanks of the era. Its low silhouette, rapid fire gun, fast revolving power turret and blinding speed made it a very dangerous and slippery enemy. German tank crews hated the Hellcat, because if you didn't get off the first round, you weren't likely to live long enough to get off the second one. M18s were too fast to engage in a running fight. They would be behind a tank long before it could traverse its turret. M18s usually operated in pairs, which really made them tough to deal with.

At St.Vith, two M18s killed more than a dozen Panthers, MkIVs and APCs in about 10 minutes. Supported by several M10s, Shermans and 90mm anti-tank guns, they beat the living snot out of German armor for several days. The German's failure to take St.Vith without a major engagement crushed their timetable. More-so than the defense of Bastogne, the defense at St.Vith sealed the fate of the German offensive. The newly arrived M18s were a critical part of the Bulge defense.

Some historians rate the M18 as the best tank destroyer of the war. Some were still in service into the middle 1970s.


My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline TonyJoey

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1953
Re: M18 Hellcat
« Reply #3 on: August 18, 2009, 01:31:25 AM »
Definite YES! Would love to see this in-game. M8 with a 76mm, give me one please! :aok

Offline JunkyII

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8428
Re: M18 Hellcat
« Reply #4 on: August 18, 2009, 01:41:00 AM »
De Ja Vu? I think i read another M18 wish just like 2 seconds ago ;)
DFC Member
Proud Member of Pigs on the Wing
"Yikes"

Offline Unit791

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 315
Re: M18 Hellcat
« Reply #5 on: August 18, 2009, 09:13:44 AM »
It would be nice to have a Tank Destroyer out in the field.


Lol, wake up, theres already an M-18 thread thats longer than this one.
"Ideas are far more powerful than guns, we do not allow our enemies to have guns, why should be allow them to have ideas?"-
Josef Stalin


Mauser

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10196
Re: M18 Hellcat
« Reply #6 on: August 18, 2009, 09:45:34 AM »
+1
CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!

Offline Raptor

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7577
Re: M18 Hellcat
« Reply #7 on: August 18, 2009, 01:53:26 PM »
It was fast, and had a 75mm gun (same as the Firefly, maybe?) but it was so lightly armored that machine guns could and did penetrate its 1-inch armor. Troop commanders didn't understand it was NOT a tank, and tried to send it in first with infantry behind, and they would be lost quickly.

In AH it'd be a sitting duck to anything including an M8.

Actually, it'd kind of be like an up-gunned M8 in performance, I'd bet.
I get many Panzer kills in an M8 easily. I would love the M-18 because then Tigers and T34s become fair game!

In addition to Widewing's post, I don't know which country but I believe a South American country retired it's last M-18 in 1996

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: M18 Hellcat
« Reply #8 on: August 18, 2009, 02:56:13 PM »
Interesting, never knew they were serving for so long!

The bit about the tank destroyers' weak armor is true, though. They killed through front armor at 1000 yards, but in this game that doesn't equate to much, when most tanks nail you in the first round from 3k out.

I definitely think GVs need to be fleshed out (and perhaps their gameplay revisited by HTC in the future), but this particular vehicle was an ambush killer, an urban warfare killer... Outside of hiding in the buildings in tank town, where would that come into play for AH2?

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: M18 Hellcat
« Reply #9 on: August 18, 2009, 03:24:31 PM »
My reasoning for the M-18.

The standard M4 was an infantry support vehicle. 
We have no real infantry so we don't need the support vehicle.

We have NO US  tank/tank destroyer. (firefly was a brit mod so it is out)
M-18 fills that. It also opens up possibilities for other tank destroyers.
See Rule #4

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: M18 Hellcat
« Reply #10 on: August 18, 2009, 03:39:34 PM »
Yes to the M-18. :aok
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline 633DH98

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 342
Re: M18 Hellcat
« Reply #11 on: August 18, 2009, 09:12:36 PM »
M18s had the best kill to loss ratio of any western Allied armored vehicle.   SNIP

Perhaps the U.S. should have named all fighting vehicles 'Hellcat'.   ;)
DecoyDuc  2 Nov 2008 - 16 Nov 2008  RIP

Offline Skulls22

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 693
Re: M18 Hellcat
« Reply #12 on: August 19, 2009, 01:01:28 PM »
Interesting, never knew they were serving for so long!

The bit about the tank destroyers' weak armor is true, though. They killed through front armor at 1000 yards, but in this game that doesn't equate to much, when most tanks nail you in the first round from 3k out.

I definitely think GVs need to be fleshed out (and perhaps their gameplay revisited by HTC in the future), but this particular vehicle was an ambush killer, an urban warfare killer... Outside of hiding in the buildings in tank town, where would that come into play for AH2?
I Know, breaking up spawn camps. If it can get going fast enough, it can run around blasting the crap out of everything! :devil
(In game Sparty)
R.I.P. SASFRAS, may you return some day soon
<S>

Offline Enker

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1553
Re: M18 Hellcat
« Reply #13 on: August 19, 2009, 03:44:23 PM »
Perhaps the U.S. should have named all fighting vehicles 'Hellcat'.   ;)
Perhaps the U.S. still should.  ;)
InGame ID: Cairn
Quote from: BillyD topic=283300.msg3581799#msg3581799
... FOR TEH MUPPET$ TO PAD OUR SCO?E N to WIN TEH EPIC WAR OF TEH UNIVERSE We MUST VULTCHE DA RUNWAYZ N DROP UR GUYZ FIGHTERZ Bunkarz Then OUR SKWAD will Finarry Get TACTICAL NOOK for 25 KILL SCORE  STREAK>X

Offline Skulls22

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 693
Re: M18 Hellcat
« Reply #14 on: August 19, 2009, 04:05:20 PM »
I Vote Yes to M-18!!
(In game Sparty)
R.I.P. SASFRAS, may you return some day soon
<S>