The 10 Dimensions

[Motherland]

You're absolutely 100% sure about this? You're quoting of the theory is a little off but it's not worth correcting you at this point. I don't recall seeing any substantial empirical evidence beyond the thousand or so theories that have circulated through the scientific community over the past 200 years. What you state as fact is based on changing scientific theory...nothing concrete beyond scientific conjecture which changes with every generation.

You can question my degree all you want, when you stop "using your faith" in what others have written and come up with your own empirical evidence...as in provide the evidence that you personally witnessed the events as you describe.

I've never seen the dark side of the moon, therefore the moon must be a hemisphere.

Hmmm i just can't support billions of years do you have any proof of this.....

2# The moon is moving away from the earth....... billions of years just does not fit.

Fit's fine, that's why there hasn't been much change in estimations in the age of the earth and moon (4.5ish Billion years) since the 1950's.

[Enker]

Hmmm i just can't support billions of years do you have any proof of this.....

All scientific evidence points to a much short time.....

one example:   the earth is spinning slower...... billions of years  it would be spinning to fast.

2# The moon is moving away from the earth....... billions of years just does not fit.


<S>

While you might not support billions of years, surely you must be able to support the fact that the Earth is more than the 6013 years calculated by Ussher in the 17th Century. He calculated that the Earth began in 4004 BCE, though the fossilized remains of lifeforms on Earth point to Earth being far older than 6013 years old.

[OOZ662]

Their explanation of the folding concept would have made more sense to everyone if they'd drawn it as the two dimensions touching/interacting/intersecting, not just getting close to each other so the ant could "jump."

It all makes sense to me at the level they explained it. I'm sure if they went too much deeper, I'd be lost, though.

[Bosco123]

The only thing that I believe is a theory is the one about the Moon. The other has been proven already.

[Ghosth]

None of you were here when the world/universe was created, so lets just leave that out of the discussion. Ok?

String theory never really did sit right with me. Frankly there are some parts of the big bang that I'm not sure I agree with. But thats neither here nor there.

Ooz nailed it on the ant. Same thing works for any of the first 4 dimensions.
Try thinking of it this way.

Lay a towel across your lap with your knees spread. Makes a nice big 2 dimensional surface. Now put a ladybug or ant on one knee, headed for the other knee > ..........< far away.

Now bring your knees together, so that the bug can crawl from one side to the other.  >.<

A wrinkle in time, or space.

When we (as the bug) figure out how to create that wrinkle, we'll have the key to interstellar travel.

[Strip]

According to the theory of relativity, space and time are considered to be one entity. The path to interstellar travel is gravity and shaping the gravity field around us.

[boomerlu]

String theory never really did sit right with me.

Reposted from what I said earlier:

String theory at this point is merely speculation. In fact, I'd call it mathematical bananay. In order to provide a shred of evidence for string theory, it'd take a particle collider the size of the solar system.

P.S., didn't realize "bananay" was grounds for censorship.

[Meatwad]

MMM

Mathematical banana

[BrownBaron]

My 9th grade understanding:

I...here....i no see there...there no affect me, here.....why there matter?

EDIT: oh, and i didnt watch the video, maybe later

[OOZ662]

Because "there" could unlock the universe.

[BrownBaron]

Because "there" could unlock the universe.

Universe mostly no effect me...why i need know bout it?

If we made a time machine and stopped hitler, I would have no AH!!!

[bozon]

Hmmm i just can't support billions of years do you have any proof of this.....
All scientific evidence points to a much short time.....
one example:   the earth is spinning slower...... billions of years  it would be spinning to fast.
2# The moon is moving away from the earth....... billions of years just does not fit.

That is not scientific evidence. It is not even evidence  - these are un-quantified statements that are linearly (and wrongly) extrapolated to fit your required result.

What is the slowdown rate of the earth? There is actually a very good explanation for that - tidal forces on the earth by the Sun slow it down and try to sync the spin with the orbit rate, the same as the moon's spin and orbit time around the earth are in sync. And yes, it would take billions of years to change the earth's spin in any significant manner. Even this slowdown rate is not linear, the rate itself slows down with time. This is an asymptotic behavior.

The moon is moving away from the earth - and then moves closer. There are fluctuations in its orbit due to interactions with other solar system bodies, but the moon is in no danger of escaping the earth. Linear extrapolation is silly: I jump up - I am getting away from the earth - If I wait long enough I will reach the moon. Of course, in less than a second you will find otherwise.

[OOZ662]

Universe mostly no effect me...why i need know bout it?

If we made a time machine and stopped hitler, I would have no AH!!!

Your appendix "mostly no effect" you either, but it matters when it does.

[BrownBaron]

we all gota go sometime...

[FireDrgn]

That is not scientific evidence. It is not even evidence  - these are un-quantified statements that are linearly (and wrongly) extrapolated to fit your required result.

What is the slowdown rate of the earth? There is actually a very good explanation for that - tidal forces on the earth by the Sun slow it down and try to sync the spin with the orbit rate, the same as the moon's spin and orbit time around the earth are in sync. And yes, it would take billions of years to change the earth's spin in any significant manner. Even this slowdown rate is not linear, the rate itself slows down with time. This is an asymptotic behavior.

The moon is moving away from the earth - and then moves closer. There are fluctuations in its orbit due to interactions with other solar system bodies, but the moon is in no danger of escaping the earth. Linear extrapolation is silly: I jump up - I am getting away from the earth - If I wait long enough I will reach the moon. Of course, in less than a second you will find otherwise.

Interesting... to say the least ....