Author Topic: A g.v carrier plane  (Read 2029 times)

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: A g.v carrier plane
« Reply #30 on: September 19, 2009, 01:51:43 AM »
Except that in online execution things seldom happen like they did in real life. The way NOE missions happen online these things could be very useful for covering a vbase while the hangars rebuild after a smash and grab NOE mission. Of course I think it should take very heavy bomber perks for the glider equipped with a tank but thats just my desire to burn up some bomber perks on things I would never fly anyway. It might be fun though.
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: A g.v carrier plane
« Reply #31 on: September 19, 2009, 11:59:45 AM »
Since when is the relative ease or difficulty of shooting something down a deciding factor in whether or not to put it in the game?  Goons are easy to shoot down but there's still a place for them.   Lots of planes are easy to shoot down but they're still in there.  It's the variety of planes with different capabilities that makes it interesting...otherwise why have more than one type of plane at all?   

Was about to say "why do you care if it's easy to kill? Isn't that a good thing for the peope who don't fly it?"



I've always thought some type of gv-hauling aircraft would be a nice addition.   It's historically realistic to add one, and more importantly it adds a tactical element that is currently lacking on some maps.   Ndisles for example is an all-island map in which you can't attack most of the fields except by air.   It would add something to gameplay to have the possibility of gv's landing on the island somewhere and rolling toward a field. 

Been asking for one, but mostly in others threads. Agreed. The only problem I can see is you would need a clear spot to land. Like on the beach, and currently its kinda hard to tell where the water starts. So this probably won't happen untill we get a realistic eniornment with fields, farms, forests, lakes, meadows, etc.



That being said, it would be difficult to add to the game because you have to transition the pilot from the cockpit of the plane to the driver's seat of the gv somehow after the plane lands.  You'd have to figure out how to count the sortie (make it two sorties, one bomber and one gv?), you'd need some reason to land a jeep-sized vehicle somewhere which might mean adding light artillery, etc, etc. 

Well I've suggested having it so you land and pick up GV's. When you open doors, and when they roll in, a button apears "attaching" them to you. They are in your cargo bay, but to keep them from getting bored, i say we have it so they can move around the plane. This meaning they get to see what is happening instead of being stuck in a dark hole but can't gun or anything (there would be another position which would be their GV's). Another possibility would be to have it so when you start on the runway, the gv's up and then can pull up inside your cargo bay; this would eliminate the need of landing after take off.

And I belive they could carry tanks. Not anything uber heavy like the tigerII, but like a panzer or the MABY the tiger I.
I've suggested we add field guns and artty that you can carry in a goon, land, and then it sets it's self up, but only after like 5-10 minutes.
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: A g.v carrier plane
« Reply #32 on: September 19, 2009, 12:03:29 PM »
Except that in online execution things seldom happen like they did in real life. The way NOE missions happen online these things could be very useful for covering a vbase while the hangars rebuild after a smash and grab NOE mission. Of course I think it should take very heavy bomber perks for the glider equipped with a tank but thats just my desire to burn up some bomber perks on things I would never fly anyway. It might be fun though.

Of course it would be perked heavily. But you are right, many things get used in ways they weren't intended, or histicaly used for. So It's still a valid argument, but you can't really cut off many planes with the argument "they weren't used like that" or "they almost never did that", because as long as it could have carried what you asked for then its a valid and realistic wish.
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline USCH

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1713
Re: A g.v carrier plane
« Reply #33 on: September 19, 2009, 01:10:19 PM »
Ive used 262's to take ord out NOE...
Ive also flown every aircraft in the game NOE and been successfully
why not i say...
big fat target? ya sure... but so is a goon or a d3a or a P40b

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: A g.v carrier plane
« Reply #34 on: September 19, 2009, 03:17:17 PM »
Hell, atleast the P-40B has guns.....
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline EskimoJoe

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4831
Re: A g.v carrier plane
« Reply #35 on: September 19, 2009, 03:40:00 PM »
P-40B is deadly in the right hands.
Put a +1 on your geekness atribute  :aok

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: A g.v carrier plane
« Reply #36 on: September 19, 2009, 04:42:02 PM »
P-40B is deadly in the right hands.

It's deadly to me in MY hands  :D
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: A g.v carrier plane
« Reply #37 on: September 19, 2009, 05:19:49 PM »
Depends on who your talking to :devil...
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15724
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
Re: A g.v carrier plane
« Reply #38 on: September 19, 2009, 05:33:36 PM »
The logical addition would be the Ju52, slower than the goon and not much armament, but it would fill gaps in the scenario planesets.
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: A g.v carrier plane
« Reply #39 on: September 19, 2009, 06:44:22 PM »
True, but it would pretty much be used for scenarios only.
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: A g.v carrier plane
« Reply #40 on: September 20, 2009, 08:29:36 AM »
     Those crazy marines landed and tookoff from the USS Forest Fire, but well after
the war  :D

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x69f02_c130-takes-off-and-lands-on-a-carri_tech

     There was also scuttlebutt that a B-29 made a practice approach on an Essex
class at the end of the war, but it was meant as a joke :rofl
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: A g.v carrier plane
« Reply #41 on: September 20, 2009, 12:47:26 PM »
Kinda like how I make "firing runs" at my squadies flying bombers and say,

"bang bang, bang, bang bang bang. Ha Ace, I shot you" over the squad channel?
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10633
Re: A g.v carrier plane
« Reply #42 on: September 24, 2009, 11:59:00 PM »
Awww come on Ack-Ack, just because most of them wound up looking like this, doesn't mean it wouldn't be fun to try!    ;)

(Image removed from quote.)
They even look better in colour.



Offline phatzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3734
      • No Crying
Re: A g.v carrier plane
« Reply #43 on: September 25, 2009, 12:29:09 AM »
True, but it would pretty much be used for scenarios only.
no If the ju 52 were available I would fly it instead of the gooney bird anytime
No thank you Turkish, I'm sweet enough.

Offline chris3

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 690
      • http://www.ludwigs-hobby-seite.de/
Re: A g.v carrier plane
« Reply #44 on: September 25, 2009, 01:34:36 AM »
moin

im for the "gigant". imagine what one squad can do with this ability. you can start a gv fight anywere you want.
ok, we need a litel gamey change, we need the ability to transport Panzer IV, t34, and sherman. than it would be realy fun and it would made the game more intestenig.

cu chris3