Author Topic: Just Wondering...(Spits and 190`s)  (Read 376 times)

Offline LLv34 Jarsci

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 503
Just Wondering...(Spits and 190`s)
« on: November 19, 2000, 07:02:00 AM »
...That I have read about 190s turning with spit Vs and being a helluva opponent to Spitfeuer pilots...well here in AH I havent
seen any of 190 jockeys to kill a spit in TnB fight..and not many times in BnZ either..because if ya try to turn in a 190 with spit your stall horn gives ya warning and here we go..stalling always. And when ya try to Bnz spit lower than you you cant make your guns to bear so fast as spit V is changing direction.

And all this WASNT mentioned in the books I have read. There Spit V was quite easy prey for 190 A4. Do I smell something wrong here with FMs??

LLv 34 Jarski

Offline SageFIN

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 176
Just Wondering...(Spits and 190`s)
« Reply #1 on: November 19, 2000, 10:23:00 AM »
I do hope you are wearing your thickest asbestos underwear.

------------------
---
SageFIN

"The wolves are gathering, the stars are shifting...
come, join us in the hunt!"
---

Offline 214thCavalier

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1929
Just Wondering...(Spits and 190`s)
« Reply #2 on: November 19, 2000, 11:16:00 AM »
Jarsci the early ME109's not 190's were said to be able to turn with the spits "IF" the pilot was skilled enough and had the balls to try, most of them gave up when the slats popped out apparently.
190's mode of operation was to NOT try and turn with the spits but keep speed up and BnZ.
I think from here i will leave it to BK, Camo and Snef to educate you further  

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Just Wondering...(Spits and 190`s)
« Reply #3 on: November 19, 2000, 11:24:00 AM »
   I can't turn fight a 190,but the lurning curve is steap and I am new

         Brady

Offline Zigrat

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 792
Just Wondering...(Spits and 190`s)
« Reply #4 on: November 19, 2000, 12:41:00 PM »
nah, a 190a5 2 gun can turn with a spitIX *IF* the spit is full of gas and you are empty. And he is not a good pilot.

or a 109F4 can turn with a IX.

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Just Wondering...(Spits and 190`s)
« Reply #5 on: November 19, 2000, 01:52:00 PM »
Hi

I think tight turning ability is an overrated feature in flight sims, all the early war turn type planes essentialy became hi powerd monsters, best example spit14 or they were eaten alive by late war high power monsters, best example zero. Even if you examine the zeros sucesses, they all occured when it was about as fast or faster than its primary opponets, yes it could turn like a deamon but it was only a sucessful fighter when it was capable of genearlly keeping up with the enemy planes in speed and also outclimbing them. The zero was slaughterd in droves when hellcat came out. It could turn just as good as before, but now it was slow and climbed poorly compared to enemy planes. Turning doesnt do toejam in RL it just slows your bellybutton down so you can be shot by somebody else.  More specifically about the SpitV vs 190 question, the RAF was scared to death of the 190. Thats a plain and simple fact. SpitV pilots avoided combat with 190 if 190 had co-alt.  Spit pilots said 190s were much more agressive than 109 pilots who just tended to boom and zoom, while 190 would stay and fight spit in horizontal. Does this say anything specifically about 190 performance? No but it does clearly point out that the spitfires horizontal turning advantage over 190 didnt matter as much to spit pilots in RL as it does here. There was a famous argument between some spitV pilots and their commanders when they first faced the 190s, more or less it went like this. The commanders kept telling the pilots to use their superior flat turn against the 190. The pilots angrily replied that flat turning doesnt win air battles. Again nothing specific about airplane perfomance can be derived from that statement, but RAF fighter design policy for the rest of the war clearly reflects that pilots sentiments.
We then have spit 9 and 14 which were for most part boom and zoom type aircraft with high climbrates and speeds, reduced turning and in case of spit14 reduced handling. Do I need to mention Tempest? Plus it would be good to remember the RAF was just about to perform a suicide commando raid to capture a 190 in France, surely this plane scared the toejam out of them to a great extent if they were willing to sacrifice dozens of lives to get one. This raid never took place courtesy of Arnim Faber and his little navigation error.
Before anyone jumps on me for supposedly bashing spits or something like that, please just recognize the fact that spitV had a very very very bad time with 190, and that doesnt seem to translate well in AH. By the time spit9 came along it was a contest of pilot skill, and by the time of spit14 it was no contest at all as far as 190A is concerned. Basically turning ability is somehow overrated in computer flight sims compared to RL WW2 combat.

thanks GRUNHERZ

Offline juzz

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 193
      • http://nope.haha.com
Just Wondering...(Spits and 190`s)
« Reply #6 on: November 19, 2000, 02:15:00 PM »
Countdown to Polish Sqn counterattack beings now...  

Planes with superior performance can dictate when and where the fight occurs, if at all. With the enemy using proper wingman tactics, better turning ability won't help as it will probably put you into someone elses gunsight, for sure.

funked

  • Guest
Just Wondering...(Spits and 190`s)
« Reply #7 on: November 19, 2000, 07:15:00 PM »
Wow Grunherz I agree 100%.  I think there are three reasons why in AH, turning is valued over speed more than in WW2:

1.  Icons.  Most guys didn't see who killed them in real life, but in here we get a nice huge label on them at 3 miles range.  In an environment where it's not so easy to spot the enemy, if you have a big speed advantage over enemy planes it's very hard for them to bounce you even if you don't see them.  On the other hand you can easily catch and bounce an enemy that doesn't see you.

2.  Deflection shooting.  For whatever reason (gun modeling, icons, tons of practice) even the average AH pilot can make shots while pulling a lot of gees.  In WW2 this was something that only a few guys could do consistently.  Because of the difficulty in shooting while turning, turning was not an offensive move but a defensive one.

3.  Net lag.  A maneuvering plane is artificially hard to track in AH because of micro-warping.

That said, if the AH Main Arena had just Spit V and Fw 190A-5, I think the A-5 would come off a lot better.  Their superior climb/acceleration and 40 mph speed advantage means they can always dictate the terms of the engagement.  And don't underestimate the ability of a good A-5 driver to use his advantage in vertical maneuvering.

[This message has been edited by funked (edited 11-19-2000).]

Offline LLv34 Jarsci

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 503
Just Wondering...(Spits and 190`s)
« Reply #8 on: November 20, 2000, 09:50:00 AM »
Nice answers...and in most of cases the point of my msg was also understood. I was pointing out that, what also couple of answers pointed too ,that WITH icons on its almost impossible to use BnZ well unless theres nice furball going on which takes Spit`s pilots interest.
U go diving in and Spit reverses its heading in 2 secs...well try to make a lead shot there. In numerous cases I have dived with moderate speed at lower Spitfires. It flies max 200mph. I come down about 350 - 400 TAS.
When he sees me he just flips around. I pull up and start zooming up again and still I got tracers dancing below and around me..the guy in Spit has made full 360 and still able to give some loose shells in my direction at range about 700yrd- 1 k.. and thinking Hispanos thats way too close. So I agree that here in AH its possible without G-forces affecting the guy who flies it but in RL might be differently.. so what could be done to tone that effect down? And still there is something about A5 turning abilities..it still stalls too easily in turns. (my opinion only , but also heard some other people whining about it)

 Well that covers almost all I had to whine bout..

Nowadays I prefer YAK..it does almost all I want except attend my lectures at school so that I could play a little more.  

 LLv34 Jarsci

PS. I thougt I noticed a trend in answers to judge me as a newbie..maybe the count of my posts gave the wrong impression. But I have been here almost from the start and seen something on the way here so I didnt take all this sh*t from thin air. (wasnt that little too touchy..  
 

Offline Naudet

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 729
Just Wondering...(Spits and 190`s)
« Reply #9 on: November 26, 2000, 05:44:00 PM »
OK i am not flying AH at the moment, but i have a very good knowledge base on the FW190.

FW190 vs. Spit V: The FW was found superior in every aspect to the V execpt the turning circle. Early in the war, FW pilots turned with Spit and tried to tighten the turn with the electric tail trimmer, which resulted in a couple of near deck stalls, which were very deadly for the FW pilots. Later FW pilots were forbidden to use the tailtrimmer in this way.

FW190A4 vs Spit IX: The spit came close to the FW, but it still had slight advantages in nearly all aspects execpted turning circle. It is normally accepted that a fight between a FW and a IX was won by the better pilot. On one occasion Capt. E. Brown met a lonely FW190 at 26K, they engaged eachother, whenever the FW got behind him Brown broke away, the FW than climbed out, truned and tried a new attack, after 4 off this attacks, both pilots decided to withdraw, cause noone could get an advantage.


Offline StSanta

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2496
Just Wondering...(Spits and 190`s)
« Reply #10 on: November 27, 2000, 03:32:00 AM »
From what I've read, the 190's suffered from a relatively high stall speed and 109 pilots that converted to it had a tendency to scratch the ground during low speed scissors.

Just as I do in AH  .

Have to say; 1v1, the Spit is a match for the A5.

4v4, the A8 will eat the Spits  .

------------------
StSanta
9./JG 54 "Grünherz"
while(!bishRookQueue.isEmpty() && loggedOn()){
30mmDeathDIEDIEDIE(bishRookQueue.removeFront());
System.out.println("LW pilots are superior");
myPlane.performVictoryRoll();
}

Offline BBGunn

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Just Wondering...(Spits and 190`s)
« Reply #11 on: November 29, 2000, 05:33:00 PM »
I think that the spit 5 and the A6m5 in AH should be more responsive in the pitch axis as in rolling and pulling back on the stick to start a turn(corner turn). They should have a kind of bounciness in response. It also seems that the later FM puts more energy into the same turn radius for the 109 family so the plane gets through the turn quicker when it should go wider at higher speed.