Author Topic: P-80A Shooting Star  (Read 2035 times)

Offline ghostdancer

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7562
Re: P-80A Shooting Star
« Reply #15 on: September 19, 2009, 08:33:53 AM »
The F-86 Sabre, which saw lots of action in Korea, had 6 x .50s. So I wouldn't say that 6 .50s suck on a jet or prove ineffective on a jet.
X.O. 29th TFT, "We Move Mountains"
CM Terrain Team

Offline Captain Virgil Hilts

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6134
Re: P-80A Shooting Star
« Reply #16 on: September 19, 2009, 09:37:28 AM »
6 50's would suck in a jet fighter.... closure rate is to fast. That's why the 262 has 30mm's
 

Actually, the higher rate of fire of the Browning M2 and M3 50BMG is an advantage over the slower cannons in high speed attacks. And as posted above, the F-86 Sabre, equipped with 6 Browning 50's did very well against cannon equipped MiG's in Korea.
"I haven't seen Berlin yet, from the ground or the air, and I plan on doing both, BEFORE the war is over."

SaVaGe


Offline Enker

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1553
Re: P-80A Shooting Star
« Reply #17 on: September 19, 2009, 02:57:20 PM »
Actually, the higher rate of fire of the Browning M2 and M3 50BMG is an advantage over the slower cannons in high speed attacks. And as posted above, the F-86 Sabre, equipped with 6 Browning 50's did very well against cannon equipped MiG's in Korea.
Agreed, although in the book Sabres Over Mig Alley: The F-86 and The Battle for Air Superiority in Korea, by Kenneth P. Warrell, it speaks of the downside to having 6 .50s on the F-86 as being that the incendiary rounds did not ignite properly above 35k-ish feet, and thus were merely lead slamming into the Migs and not doing very major damage. That is why there were attempts to see if it were possible to mount the Sabre with four twenty millimeter cannons. Unfortunately, this project was cancelled due to the excess gun exhaust clogging and killing the engine with *no way to restart it.

*The part after the asterisk might not be true, just working mostly from memory here.
InGame ID: Cairn
Quote from: BillyD topic=283300.msg3581799#msg3581799
... FOR TEH MUPPET$ TO PAD OUR SCO?E N to WIN TEH EPIC WAR OF TEH UNIVERSE We MUST VULTCHE DA RUNWAYZ N DROP UR GUYZ FIGHTERZ Bunkarz Then OUR SKWAD will Finarry Get TACTICAL NOOK for 25 KILL SCORE  STREAK>X

Offline B4Buster

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4816
Re: P-80A Shooting Star
« Reply #18 on: September 19, 2009, 03:02:09 PM »
Has the OP ever seen a P-80??
"I was a door gunner on the space shuttle Columbia" - Scott12B

Offline Dream Child

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 256
Re: P-80A Shooting Star
« Reply #19 on: September 19, 2009, 09:27:50 PM »
6 50's would suck in a jet fighter.... closure rate is to fast. That's why the 262 has 30mm's
 

The 30mm's the 262 used were really terrible guns to try to hit anything with in real life. Due to the low velocity of the round, they had something like 50 foot of drop at 800 yards, compared to approximately 16 foot of drop for the .50 BMG at the same distance. Muzzle velocity was 1600 fps compared to just under 3000 fps for the .50 BMG. The velocity, or really the lack of velocity, of those 30mm shells made it hard to lead a comparable fighter aircraft. When the USAF did upgrade, it went with 20mm cannon that had good velocity (think Hispano), not some low velocity piece of garbage.

Offline Dream Child

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 256
Re: P-80A Shooting Star
« Reply #20 on: September 19, 2009, 09:34:06 PM »
Agreed, although in the book Sabres Over Mig Alley: The F-86 and The Battle for Air Superiority in Korea, by Kenneth P. Warrell, it speaks of the downside to having 6 .50s on the F-86 as being that the incendiary rounds did not ignite properly above 35k-ish feet, and thus were merely lead slamming into the Migs and not doing very major damage. That is why there were attempts to see if it were possible to mount the Sabre with four twenty millimeter cannons. Unfortunately, this project was cancelled due to the excess gun exhaust clogging and killing the engine with *no way to restart it.

*The part after the asterisk might not be true, just working mostly from memory here.

This can't be quite right. The guns on a F-86 sit outside and way behind the jet air intake. There must be something else missing here.

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: P-80A Shooting Star
« Reply #21 on: September 20, 2009, 08:24:08 AM »
     The Canadians used F-86s with 4 20mm, and I believe a slightly
more powerful engine.



80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline Captain Virgil Hilts

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6134
Re: P-80A Shooting Star
« Reply #22 on: September 20, 2009, 08:49:04 AM »
That bird has the gun ports for the 6 50BMG gun package.
"I haven't seen Berlin yet, from the ground or the air, and I plan on doing both, BEFORE the war is over."

SaVaGe


Offline Shifty

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9377
      • 307th FS
Re: P-80A Shooting Star
« Reply #23 on: September 20, 2009, 08:56:28 AM »
6 50's would suck in a jet fighter.... closure rate is to fast. That's why the 262 has 30mm's
 

Jebus  :lol
« Last Edit: September 20, 2009, 09:06:52 AM by Shifty »

JG-11"Black Hearts"...nur die Stolzen, nur die Starken

"Haji may have blown my legs off but I'm still a stud"~ SPC Thomas Vandeventer Delta1/5 1st CAV

Offline Shifty

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9377
      • 307th FS
Re: P-80A Shooting Star
« Reply #24 on: September 20, 2009, 10:48:59 AM »
Has the OP ever seen a P-80??

Just curious what you meant by this question. Are you saying the looks of the aircraft make a difference on it's combat performance?



Just my opinion... The P-80 was a beautiful bird and would have accounted well for herself in combat against the ME-262.

JG-11"Black Hearts"...nur die Stolzen, nur die Starken

"Haji may have blown my legs off but I'm still a stud"~ SPC Thomas Vandeventer Delta1/5 1st CAV

Offline Dream Child

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 256
Re: P-80A Shooting Star
« Reply #25 on: September 20, 2009, 04:29:35 PM »
Just curious what you meant by this question. Are you saying the looks of the aircraft make a difference on it's combat performance?


I think he's asking the person who originated this thread what he meant when he said "...it was basically designed like the ME-262 but had 6 50 cals on the nose..." While the performance was similar, the design isn't.

Offline Shifty

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9377
      • 307th FS
Re: P-80A Shooting Star
« Reply #26 on: September 20, 2009, 05:41:09 PM »
I think he's asking the person who originated this thread what he meant when he said "...it was basically designed like the ME-262 but had 6 50 cals on the nose..." While the performance was similar, the design isn't.

Ahh that explains it.  After Ace's comment on 50 cals nit working in jets I kind of forgot about the OP's comments.
Thanks

JG-11"Black Hearts"...nur die Stolzen, nur die Starken

"Haji may have blown my legs off but I'm still a stud"~ SPC Thomas Vandeventer Delta1/5 1st CAV

Offline Dantoo

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 970
      • http://www.9giap.com
Re: P-80A Shooting Star
« Reply #27 on: September 21, 2009, 08:44:22 AM »
Adding to the hijack - the Australian version of the Sabre was equipped with 2 30mm Aden guns.  The gases from the cannon caused compressor stalls in the Avon engines that were fitted to this model.  The problem was overcome by redesign.

I get really really tired of selective realism disguised as a desire to make bombers easier to kill.

HiTech

Matthew 24:28 For wherever the carcass is, there is where the vultures gather together.