« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: no substitute for cubic inches  (Read 2286 times)

Offline sntslilhlpr6601

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 254
Re: no substitute for cubic inches
« Reply #30 on: October 01, 2009, 10:39:52 PM »
Does anyone have any good links or care to explain how a two-stroke diesel works? I can't find anything and when I think about how a diesel works and then how a two-stroke works I just can't put the two together.  :(
Logged

Offline Die Hard

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2205
Re: no substitute for cubic inches
« Reply #31 on: October 02, 2009, 03:33:51 AM »
It would work like a two-stroke gasoline engine. The heavy fuel oil is a lubricant in itself. It just uses higher compression to detonate the fuel-air mix instead of a spark plug. In the Wärtsilä-Sulzer I believe the cylinders work in pairs; one cylinder compressing the fuel-air mix of the other cylinder. Basically having cross-feed transfer ports.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBiJBw0tp7U
Logged
It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence.

-Gandhi

Offline Die Hard

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2205
Re: no substitute for cubic inches
« Reply #32 on: October 02, 2009, 03:45:58 AM »
Logged
It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence.

-Gandhi

Offline OOZ662

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7019
Re: no substitute for cubic inches
« Reply #33 on: October 02, 2009, 03:52:51 AM »
Ahhh, I remember seeing that episode.
Logged
A Rook who first flew 09/26/03 at the age of 13, has been a GL in 10+ Scenarios, and was two-time Points and First Annual 68KO Cup winner of the AH Extreme Air Racing League.

Offline pipz

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4899
Re: no substitute for cubic inches
« Reply #34 on: October 02, 2009, 04:04:37 PM »
Quote from: SIK1 on September 30, 2009, 05:41:32 PM
Being a diesel it wouldn't have any spark plugs.

I do like the turbo charger that's larger than my house.

Ehhhh it was a joke......................... ...... <G>


Pipz
Logged
Silence tells me secretly everything.
                                                                     
Montreal! Free the Pitt Bulls!!!!!

Offline sntslilhlpr6601

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 254
Re: no substitute for cubic inches
« Reply #35 on: October 02, 2009, 06:06:25 PM »
Thanks diehard. I was kinda leaning that way because I knew the fuel/air mixture had to go through the crankcase for lubrication. I just didn't really know that you could build a diesel without the fuel injection. Obviously crankcase pressures aren't high enough to cause detonation.
Logged

Offline bmwgs

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 808
Re: no substitute for cubic inches
« Reply #36 on: October 03, 2009, 12:29:32 PM »
Many, Many years ago I tagged along with a friend to our local drag strip, (car drag strip that is).  He was into drag racing, but I had little interest except for the beer that they sold.  We were in the pit area and he was talking to a couple of the owners and the question of engine size was being discussed.  I remember one of the owners making this comment, and I have no idea why I remembered it for so many years.  "The only substitute for cubic inches is cubic money". 

Fred
Logged
One of the serious problems in planning the fight against American doctrine, is that the Americans do not read their manuals, nor do they feel any obligation to follow their doctrine... - From a Soviet Junior Lt's Notebook

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: no substitute for cubic inches
« Reply #37 on: October 03, 2009, 03:49:04 PM »
Quote from: drag car owner
The only substitute for cubic inches is cubic money

 :lol
Logged
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline ridley1

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 677
Re: no substitute for cubic inches
« Reply #38 on: October 03, 2009, 06:25:06 PM »
As for two-stroke diesels...
Detroit diesel made 2 strokes for years for road use... the 6V92.

 A lot of city buses used them..a very disdinctive exhaust note.
Logged

Offline morfiend

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10470
Re: no substitute for cubic inches
« Reply #39 on: October 03, 2009, 06:37:47 PM »
Technically speaking,most RC plane engines are 2 stroke diesels,tho they dont burn diesel fuel!

 IIRC the germans use a 2 stroke diesel engine in 1 of their A/C,I think it was designed to burn a coal based fuel.

   :salute
Logged

Offline Die Hard

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2205
Re: no substitute for cubic inches
« Reply #40 on: October 04, 2009, 03:38:25 AM »
It was the Ju-86 high altitude recon plane. Most if not all German aviation fuel was coal-based Fischer-Tropsch synthetic fuel.
Logged
It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence.

-Gandhi
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »