my wishlist

[EskimoJoe]

Looks like the author of your JROTC book got his/her information from Wikipedia 

[oakranger]

bomber hater

Is there a rule that skuzzy places on "bomber haters"?

Good set of AC.  some we may never see on AH.

[Larry]

I'm curious to what you were reading/viewing to even remotely approach your claims?   While I admire some of the picks you chose, I'm just trying to shed some truth on "claims".   

But, but wiki is always right!!!

[guncrasher]

Looks like the author of your JROTC book got his/her information from Wikipedia  

name one place on the net that is never wrong?  all the stuff out there is placed according to whoever wrote the stuff and his own bias and some of it is only based on a true story.  dont just disregard stuff just because its on this website or pretend its true because its on that one.  if your own contribution is just to complain that its on wikipedia or any other source, without actually proving it wrong, then why bloat the thread.  remember you can have two different books contradicting each other and yet they can both be right.  what actually is considered "combat action" is elusive,  there's lots of pilots that will tell you that they saw action over germany when not a single bullet was fired in anger at them.  are they telling the truth when they say they saw action?  some say yes, some say no.  some sources will say that a plane saw action if it upped and did a circle around the base and landed when some enemy planes were in sight, some other will look at the same and say that plane never saw action.  how is written and worded is based on whoever wrote the book.  so if he has a book that says that plane saw action and u have another that says that plane never saw action.  u could actually both be right.


semp

[wild949]

what about the other aircraft in my list? the Fulmar for instance. that saw lots of action protecting the suply convoys. plus my other idea, the folding wings on naval aircraft and making the carriers wider.

[Saxman]

Folding wings wouldn't add anything to the game. It might look neat, but we don't have friendly collisions so it's not like you need to fold your wings to fit more planes on deck, and aircraft all spawn in position for takeoff, and we don't have crewmen to spot aircraft (pilots didn't spot themselves by backing up like we do on the game, the aircraft were positioned by the carrier's flight crew).

There's other things of far, FAR more importance that are needed than that what would be purely an aesthetic detail.

[wild949]

Its still a nice cocept though, Anyways what about the other planes on the list?

[Jayhawk]

Is there a rule that skuzzy places on "bomber haters"?

joke
  noun, verb, joked, jok⋅ing.

–noun
1.    something said or done to provoke laughter or cause amusement, as a witticism, a short and amusing anecdote, or a prankish act: He tells very funny jokes. She played a joke on him.
2.    something that is amusing or ridiculous, esp. because of being ludicrously inadequate or a sham; a thing, situation, or person laughed at rather than taken seriously; farce: Their pretense of generosity is a joke. An officer with no ability to command is a joke.
3.    a matter that need not be taken very seriously; trifling matter: The loss was no joke.

[Saxman]

The highest priority would be the Ki-45, followed by the Beaufighter. The Fullmar wouldn't be a bad addition, but I don't know that there's many glaring gaps that it fills in the Mains or special events. The same with the Fw-200: it wouldn't add much to either the Mains or special events.

[wild949]

But still you know, I think the Condor should be added along with its missle,  It would be a good anti ship plane. The reason i wanted the Fulmar is becuase that there arnt that many brit naval aircraft in the game for one and two people were complain there arnt that many EW aircraft in the game.