Author Topic: This does mean we can just as easily have the 38H too right?  (Read 2245 times)

Offline StokesAk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3665
Re: This does mean we can just as easily have the 38H too right?
« Reply #30 on: October 10, 2009, 09:58:57 PM »
Guppy it dont see how it is that much different if you fly a G...its gonna end up smashed in the ground somewhere.
Strokes

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: This does mean we can just as easily have the 38H too right?
« Reply #31 on: October 10, 2009, 10:02:50 PM »
Guppy it dont see how it is that much different if you fly a G...its gonna end up smashed in the ground somewhere.

 :rofl
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23876
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: This does mean we can just as easily have the 38H too right?
« Reply #32 on: October 10, 2009, 10:43:31 PM »
after the 38H, 51c and K, P63 ect, i suggest we add the Spit 18, ive forgotten most of the specs except 4x .50's and 4x 20mm's.

No, it had either 4x20mm OR the usual 2x20 + 2x .50 cal

And it did not see service in WWII.
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: This does mean we can just as easily have the 38H too right?
« Reply #33 on: October 11, 2009, 12:26:01 AM »
well since nobody went down this road yet i will    :devil

after the 38H, 51c and K, P63 ect, i suggest we add the Spit 18, ive forgotten most of the specs except 4x .50's and 4x 20mm's.

throw in the b29, put hurricanes, mossies and b25's off the carrier, and we'll have a grand old time

 :salute

Spit 18 was a postwar bird and almost identical to the low back XIV.

But this is the 38H thread anyway! :)

The point was, the 47M was easily done as an existing model existed already so it was basically tweaking the numbers on it to get it to the 47M.  Figured it would be as easy to do with the other early model 38s, with the H being first!  :aok
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline texastc316

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1774
      • Mighty 316th
Re: This does mean we can just as easily have the 38H too right?
« Reply #34 on: October 11, 2009, 12:40:01 AM »

And you, Allen, can now replace my wife's cat
TexsTC-CO/Court Jester-Mighty 316th FS "CREEPING DEATH"  in MA/FSO

The eager pilots are not experienced. And the experienced not eager.

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: This does mean we can just as easily have the 38H too right?
« Reply #35 on: October 11, 2009, 01:28:50 AM »
P-38H.  would this be the....ummmm..... last model of the P-38 before the war ended?
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline mensa180

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4010
Re: This does mean we can just as easily have the 38H too right?
« Reply #36 on: October 11, 2009, 01:29:59 AM »
The consortium stands behind this wish. 
inactive
80th FS "Headhunters"
Public Relations Officer

Offline cactuskooler

  • Skinner Team
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2093
Re: This does mean we can just as easily have the 38H too right?
« Reply #37 on: October 11, 2009, 01:44:08 AM »
P-38H.  would this be the....ummmm..... last model of the P-38 before the war ended?

The H series P-38 had the same airframe as the earlier F and G models but had the Allison V-1710-F17 engines installed (same engine that later appeared in the J series).  According to the chart I'm looking at it produced 1425 HP at sea level compared to 1325 that the G's engines put out.  Weight went up a little bit as well but, but unless I'm missing something it would still be lighter than the P-38J with similar power output.

What prompted the change to the J was the leading edge wing intercoolers that were present on the early P-38's couldn't keep up with the increase in power from the newer engines which prompted the move to the deep chin you see under the props on the P-38J and L.  The new space in the wing was converted to fuel cells which is also why the J and L have longer endurance than the G does in AH.
cactus
80th FS "Headhunters"

Noseart

Offline Nisky

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 251
Re: This does mean we can just as easily have the 38H too right?
« Reply #38 on: October 11, 2009, 10:32:21 AM »
The H series P-38 had the same airframe as the earlier F and G models but had the Allison V-1710-F17 engines installed (same engine that later appeared in the J series).  According to the chart I'm looking at it produced 1425 HP at sea level compared to 1325 that the G's engines put out.  Weight went up a little bit as well but, but unless I'm missing something it would still be lighter than the P-38J with similar power output.

What prompted the change to the J was the leading edge wing inter coolers that were present on the early P-38's couldn't keep up with the increase in power from the newer engines which prompted the move to the deep chin you see under the props on the P-38J and L.  The new space in the wing was converted to fuel cells which is also why the J and L have longer endurance than the G does in AH.
Updated 1,425hp (1063-kW) V-1710-89/-91 engines powered the 375 P38-Hs, which also introduced automatic oil radiator flaps to solve a major engine overheating problem. In other respects the P-38H was essentially identical to the P-38G-10-LO, though it had B33 intsead of B-13 turbochargers.
just talk about random stuff but please stay on topic

Recently Touched By The Noodle! ALL HAIL THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER!
Pastafarian for life

Offline 2ADoc

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 523
Re: This does mean we can just as easily have the 38H too right?
« Reply #39 on: October 11, 2009, 04:26:28 PM »
AS for all the Parts that the 38 pilots are leaving all over the Arenas, call Red Bull they will buy any warbird parts, and restore them...... 
Takeoffs are optional, landings aren't
Vini Vedi Velcro
See Rule 4, 13, 14.

Offline stodd

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2355
Re: This does mean we can just as easily have the 38H too right?
« Reply #40 on: October 11, 2009, 05:23:59 PM »
Don't get me wrong, I want the P-63, big time, but I'm happy with the Jug, and plus, HTC would have to remodel the P-39 to make it a P-63(New wing, and tail sections, not to mention 4 bladed prop, 58 rounds of 37 instead of the standard 30, and up the performance...etc)  And I'm not saying don't add the 38H, just, how does it compare to the other 38s?
Yikes big sentence. :headscratch: :neener:
Stodd/ CandyMan
I don't get why you even typed that, you know it's stupid.


Offline CAP1

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22287
      • The Axis Vs Allies Arena
Re: This does mean we can just as easily have the 38H too right?
« Reply #41 on: October 11, 2009, 11:46:35 PM »
AS for all the Parts that the 38 pilots are leaving all over the Arenas, call Red Bull they will buy any warbird parts, and restore them...... 


i'll make em spend so much money, they;ll go broke
ingame 1LTCAP
80th FS "Headhunters"
S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning in a Bottle)

Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: This does mean we can just as easily have the 38H too right?
« Reply #42 on: October 12, 2009, 12:44:15 AM »
 :banana:
« Last Edit: October 12, 2009, 12:50:12 AM by Kazaa »



"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline Kung Fu

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 40
Re: This does mean we can just as easily have the 38H too right?
« Reply #43 on: October 12, 2009, 09:07:26 AM »
HTC needs to put out another Axis plane, the allies have plenty on the list as it is. 

Ki-43
Ki-44
Ki-100
J2M
More 190 & 109 variants

  Jagdgeschwader 11

"Many pilots of the time were the opinion that a fighter pilot in a closed cockpit was an impossible thing, because you should smell the enemy. You could smell them because of the oil they were burning."

Offline vonKrimm

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 949
Re: This does mean we can just as easily have the 38H too right?
« Reply #44 on: October 12, 2009, 09:37:10 AM »
Ki-27a with 2x 7.7mm & as a variant, the Ki-27b with 1x 7.7mm + 12.7mm & bombs

Ki-43-Ic with 2x 12.7mm & as a variant, the Ki-43-IIa

As for the OP's original question: I don't see why not.  Just gotta get pyro & a skinner to agree (I heard 25yo single-malt scotch works wonders for these requests)

« Last Edit: October 12, 2009, 09:39:00 AM by vonKrimm »


Fight Like a Girl