Author Topic: 3D model specification?  (Read 4257 times)

Offline ToeTag

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1113
Re: 3D model specification?
« Reply #30 on: October 10, 2009, 07:32:28 AM »
Dont get me wrong.  If It means getting the JU87g introduced sooner I am all for it :devil
They call it "common sense", then why is it so uncommon?

Offline saantana

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 763
      • Dywizjon 308
Re: 3D model specification?
« Reply #31 on: October 10, 2009, 09:35:15 AM »
The Blender 3D would be also up to the task. We just need the target format and specifications for the exported data. 



Blender 3D looks like the open source tool of choice. The target format is most probably open flight (hitech, correct me if I'm wrong) and 3d blender does export into that format.

Specifications? Hitech can we talk now?   :headscratch:
Saantana
308 Polish Squadron RAF
http://dywizjon308.servegame.org

"I have fought a good fight, I have finished the course, I have kept my faith"

Offline Knite

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 805
Re: 3D model specification?
« Reply #32 on: October 10, 2009, 09:56:50 AM »
Anyone else notice hitech didn't say anything about formats, or even allowing this... his exact words were :
Quote from: hitech
You you purchase Multigen we can talk.

So, did anyone purchase Multigen?
It doesn't matter what may or may not work, Multigen is what hitech wants.
Knite

39th FS "Cobra In The Clouds"

I'm basically here to lower the 39th's score :P

Offline Strip

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Re: 3D model specification?
« Reply #33 on: October 10, 2009, 10:04:10 AM »
If I knew the rules of the game I would consider buying it depending on the cost.

I wont, however, go buy a program and be told, "Just kidding."

Ya know?

Offline saantana

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 763
      • Dywizjon 308
Re: 3D model specification?
« Reply #34 on: October 10, 2009, 10:31:57 AM »
Anyone else notice hitech didn't say anything about formats, or even allowing this... his exact words were :
So, did anyone purchase Multigen?
It doesn't matter what may or may not work, Multigen is what hitech wants.

Multigen is a tool that for most part companies dealing with 3d modeling can afford. Individuals less likely so. Most individuals use open source software, and the question is whether those two can be compatible.

From what I researched Multigen uses a format that is compatible called openflight. Now the question is would models in this format submitted by the community that meet the quality criteria be considered for a model competition.

Maybe just start with GV models for instance? See how that rolls.
Saantana
308 Polish Squadron RAF
http://dywizjon308.servegame.org

"I have fought a good fight, I have finished the course, I have kept my faith"

Offline rabbidrabbit

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3910
Re: 3D model specification?
« Reply #35 on: October 10, 2009, 10:35:22 AM »
or terrain objects...>  I'd have to imagine doing planes is much bigger project than most would realize and be willing to do.  Starting a process small and seeing if it works up sounds a bit more viable.

Offline Easyscor

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10908
Re: 3D model specification?
« Reply #36 on: October 10, 2009, 11:56:27 AM »
Here you go guys. This was from 2001, so I have a feeling it will knock the wind out of some of you. It did for me back then, but be sure to let us know who is getting on board. ;)
Easy in-game again.
Since Tour 19 - 2001

Offline Ex-jazz

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 482
Re: 3D model specification?
« Reply #37 on: October 10, 2009, 12:16:14 PM »

I know this is not a game model. Pretty impressive details this mrys named guy can make
http://blenderartists.org/forum/showthread.php?t=110320

Offline Strip

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Re: 3D model specification?
« Reply #38 on: October 10, 2009, 12:24:59 PM »
A little under one million faces......

 :O

The gunsight alone took as many faces as a complete aircraft would normally use in Aces High. Great work....I would die and go to heaven if we could ever have something like that in a game.

Strip

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: 3D model specification?
« Reply #39 on: October 10, 2009, 01:10:21 PM »






I just feel like showing off now. :D
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Strip

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Re: 3D model specification?
« Reply #40 on: October 10, 2009, 01:25:18 PM »
Okay....its not even in attack mode, whats up with that!

 :D

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: 3D model specification?
« Reply #41 on: October 10, 2009, 01:43:55 PM »
No, he clicked "Fighter" in the hangar...  :bolt:

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: 3D model specification?
« Reply #42 on: October 10, 2009, 02:53:03 PM »
I would buy Multigen only if I got hired at $240k a year... its been a few years since I have seen jobs posted but I remember Fort Rucker and NASA both use this software also.
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline Baumer

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
      • 332nd Flying Mongrels
Re: 3D model specification?
« Reply #43 on: October 10, 2009, 03:08:44 PM »
Well my guess, after reading through the site and making some comparisons to software packages I've dealt with in the past, is it's going to be between $10K and $15K per seat depending on what module's Hitech would require us to buy.

But it's fun to dream,   :eek:
HTC Please show the blue planes some love!
F4F-4, FM2, SBD-5, TBM-3

Offline rabbidrabbit

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3910
Re: 3D model specification?
« Reply #44 on: October 10, 2009, 03:18:39 PM »
You did not think he was going to recommend something viable did you?